Skip to main content

Qualitative Indexes of Air Traffic Controllers Attitude Toward Mistakes Hazard

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation (AHFE 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 270))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Human factor influence on the flight safety is proven to be permanent and negative. This makes proactive studies of air traffic controllers’ (ATCO) attitude toward hazardous conditions or actions important and urgent. Such attitude is defined with indicators of human factor influence decision-making which includes ATCO preference system. Those in their turn explain both individual perception of potential hazards and generalized ranks generated by a group of ATCOs.

Preference system uses an arranged set of typical ATCOs mistakes. It shows how one mistake prevails over another. Quantitatively it is designated with mistakes ranks and provides no answer on the value of such prevailing. In order to resolve this problem differentiating method was applied with outlets removal. Further non-parametric optimization of received sound groups was performed with help of Kemeny median and priority arrangement method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sytnik, A.H., Skripets, A.V., Chouja, O.O., Demyanchuk, V.B.: Human factor and its influence on psychological safety of personnel of extreme professions in aviation. Prob. Extreme Crit. Psychol. 14, 322–330 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Safety Management Manual (SMM): Doc ICAO 9859 – AN/460. Fourth Edition (advance unedited). Montreal, Canada. (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Occupational health and safety management systems – Requirement. International standard OHSAS 18001:2007. http://iso-management.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/OHSAS-18001-2007-.pdf

  4. Human Factors Module - A Business Case for Human Factors Investment. EUROCONTROL - HUM.ET1.ST13.4000-REP-02 / 13.12.1999. https://rauterberg.employee.id.tue.nl/lecturenotes/HF99cost-report.pdf

  5. Reva, O.M., Kamyshin, V.V., Shulgin, V.A., Nevynitsyn, A.M.: System analysis: Kemeny median as optimization model of air traffic controllers group preferences system at typical mistakes hazards. Sci. Technol. Innov. 3, 55–64 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Reva, O.M., Nevinitsin, A.M., Shulgin, V.A., Kamyshin, V.V.: Flight safety management by human factor: air traffic controllers’ mistakes weights indexes. Technical regulation, metrology, information and transport technologies. In print (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Reva, O.M., Kamyshin, V.V., Nevinitsin, A.M., Shulgin, V.A.: Differential method of air traffic controllers mistakes relative hazard determination. Sci. Technol. Innov. 3(11), 70–82 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Reva, O.M, Kamyshin, V.V., Nevinitsin, A.M., Radetska, S.V.: Multistep procedure of making decisions about air traffic controllers group preference systems consistency. Technical regulation, metrology, information and transport technologies, pp. 147–152 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Reva, O.M., Kamyshin, V.V., Shulgin, V.A., Nevinitsin, A.M.: System analysis: Kemeny median as optimization model of air traffic controllers group preferences system in regard to hazards of typical mistakes. Science Technologies Innovation, pp. 55–64 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Belyayevskit, L.S., Bindas, O.B.: Priorities arrangement method in quantitative estimate of hazard factors in air traffic controller’s activity. Proc. Natl. Aviat. Univ. 2, 278–284 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Reva, O.M., Suvorova, I.M.: Modeling of priority arrangement while identifying importance coefficients from teachers’ labor activities motivation. Urgent Prob. Econ. 9, 243–249 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nasirov, S.S.: Importance coefficients determination for air traffic controllers’ typical mistakes importance during air traffic control. Erospace Eng. Technol. 9, 195–201 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Berj, К.: Graph theory and its application (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Blumberg, V.A., Glucshenko, V.F.: Which decision is better? Priorities arrangement method (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Batishev, D.I.: Optimal design methods (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bronshteyn, I.N., Semendyayev, K.A.: Mathematic manual (for engineers and students) (1981)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Serhii Borsuk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Reva, O., Kamyshin, V., Borsuk, S., Shulgin, V., Nevynitsyn, A. (2021). Qualitative Indexes of Air Traffic Controllers Attitude Toward Mistakes Hazard. In: Stanton, N. (eds) Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation. AHFE 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 270. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80012-3_72

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80012-3_72

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80011-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80012-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics