Skip to main content

UX Heuristic Evaluation of Maxillo-Facial Surgery

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Usability, User Experience, Wearable and Assistive Technology (AHFE 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 275))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 4062 Accesses

Abstract

User eXperience (UX) gains more and more importance due to technological complexity, task specialization, widening of users range, etc. All of this become particularly true in medical contexts, where affordance, empathy with devices, natural interaction, dialogue reliability, real time response, etc., can make the difference for completely successful surgical activities. The PIRG - Product Innovation Research Group and the Clinic of Maxillo-facial Surgery of the University of Udine worked together for investigating about the UX during maxillo-facial surgery planning and implementation. The goal was double-faced: analyze the UX in order to highlight possible needs for improvements and test the evaluation process in terms of tools and activities performed. The outcome consists of suggestions to improve the UX and of a review of the evaluation process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bitkina, O.V., Kim, H.K., Park, J.: Usability and user experience of medical devices: an overview of the current state, analysis methodologies, and future challenges. Int. J. Ind Ergon. 76, 102932 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2020.102932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zarour, M.: A rigorous user needs experience evaluation method based on software quality standards. TELKOMNIKA 18, 2787–2799 (2020). https://doi.org/10.12928/telkomnika.v18i5.16061

  3. Saidi, T., Mutswangwa, C.T., Douglas, T.S.: Design thinking as a complement to human factors engineering for enhancing medical device usability. Eng. Stud. 11, 34–50 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/19378629.2019.1567521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tsang, J.Y., Brown, B., Peek, N., Campbell, S., Blakeman, T.: Mixed methods evaluation of a computerised audit and feedback dashboard to improve patient safety through targeting acute kidney injury (AKI) in primary care. Int. J. Med. Inform. 145, 104299 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Quiñones, D., Rusu, C., Arancibia, D., González, S., Saavedra, M.J.: SNUXH: a set of social network user experience heuristics. Appl. Sci. 10, 6547 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/app10186547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang, J., Johnson, T.R., Patel, V.L., Paige, D.L., Kubose, T.: Using usability heuristics to evaluate patient safety of medical devices. J. Biomed. Inform. 36, 23–30 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1532-0464(03)00060-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schmettow, M., Schnittker, R., Schraagen, J.M.: An extended protocol for usability validation of medical devices: research design and reference model. J. Biomed. Inform. 69, 99–114 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2017.03.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pugh, C.M., Santacaterina, S., DaRosa, D.A., Clark, R.E.: Intra-operative decision making: more than meets the eye. J. Biomed. Inform. 44, 486–496 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2010.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schiro, J., Pelayo, S., Weinhold, T., Del Zotto, M., Marcilly, R.: Usability validation of medical devices: issues in identifying potential use errors. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 234, 298–302 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-742-9-298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schramm, A., Gellrich, N.-C., Schmelzeisen, R.: Navigational Surgery of the Facial Skeleton. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68627-9

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Batista, P.D., et al.: Position and orientation errors in a neuronavigation procedure: a stepwise protocol using a cranial phantom. World Neurosurg. 126, e342–e350 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.052

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Filippi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Filippi, S., Robiony, M., Tel, A., Paludet, G. (2021). UX Heuristic Evaluation of Maxillo-Facial Surgery. In: Ahram, T.Z., Falcão, C.S. (eds) Advances in Usability, User Experience, Wearable and Assistive Technology. AHFE 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 275. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80091-8_133

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80091-8_133

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80090-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80091-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics