Skip to main content

What Factors Contribute to the Perceived Usability of Virtual Reality Technology of Conservative Industrial Consumers

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Usability, User Experience, Wearable and Assistive Technology (AHFE 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 275))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Our study investigated what factors contribute to the perceived usability of Virtual Reality technology by small firms operating in a conservative industry. For this purpose, we interviewed the developers and users of a newly developed Virtual Reality-equipped heavy machinery. We conducted eleven semi-structured interviews and used thematic analysis to identify the main themes that influenced the perceived usability of the technology by the consumers. This was significant as it contributed to their decisions about purchasing and continuing to use the technology. Consequently, it impacted the developers of the technology in their competitive capability in a conservative and homogenous industrial arena. The dimension and depth of perceived usability by this specific groups are discussed, and the practical implications are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. ISO/IEC: ISO 9241-11:2018(en): Ergonomics of Human-System Interaction — Part 11: Usability: Definitions and Concepts. ISO (2018). https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9241:-11:ed-2:v1:en

  2. Brinck, T., Bunyan, J., Gergle, D., Wood, S., Blythe, D.: Designing Web Sites That Work: Usability for the Web. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Calp, M.H., Enfiyeci, O., Canal, M.R.: Usability analysis of education-‐instruction institutions websites: a application study. In: 6th International Computer and Instructional Technologies Symposium. Gaziantep University, Turkey (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. Academic Press, Cambridge (1993)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Wickens, C.D., Lee, J.D., Liu,Y., Becker, S.G.: An Introduction to Human Factors Engineering, Second Edition. Pearson Education, Inc., New Jersey (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Holzinger, A., Searle, G., Wernbacher, M.: The effect of previous exposure to technology on acceptance and its importance in usability and accessibility engineering. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 10, 245–260 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27, 425–478 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Al-Shafi, S., Weerakkody, V.: Factors Affecting E-Government Adoption in the State of Qatar. In: EMCIS2010 (2010). http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/4395

  9. AlAwadhi, S., Morris, A.: The use of the UTAUT model in the adoption of e-government services in Kuwait. In: Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, Waikoloa (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Khechine, H., Lakhal, S., Ndjambou, P.: A meta-analysis of the UTAUT model: eleven years later. Can. J. Adm. Sci. 33, 138–152 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tornatzky, L.G., Fleischer, M., Chakrabarti, A.K.: Processes of technological innovation. Lexington Books (1990). https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=US201300694725

  12. Oliveira, T., Martins, M.F.: Literature review of information technology adoption models at firm level. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Eval. 14, 110–121 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3, 77–101 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. De Leo, G., Diggs, L.A., Radici, E., Mastaglio, T.W.: Measuring sense of presence and user characteristics to predict effective training in an online simulated virtual environment. Simul. Healthc. 9, 1–6 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Weech, S., Kenny, S., Lenizky, M., Barnett-Cowan, M.: Narrative and gaming experience interact to affect presence and cybersickness in virtual reality. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 138, 102398 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sagnier, C., Loup-Escande, E., Valléry, G.: Effects of gender and prior experience in immersive user experience with virtual reality. In: Ahram, T., Falcão, C. (eds.) AHFE 2019. AISC, vol. 972, pp. 305–314. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19135-1_30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Lucas, G., Kemeny, A., Paillot, D., Colombet, F.: A simulation sickness study on a driving simulator equipped with a vibration platform. Transp. Res. F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 68, 15–22 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sawada, Y., et al.: Effects of synchronised engine sound and vibration presentation on visually induced motion sickness. Sci. Rep. 10, 7553 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. D’Amour, S., Bos, J.E., Keshavarz, B.: The efficacy of airflow and seat vibration on reducing visually induced motion sickness. Exp. Brain Res. 235, 2811–2820 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Grassini, S., Laumann, K., Topranin, V.M., Thorp, S.: Evaluating the efficacy of multi-sensory stimulations on simulator sickness and sense of presence during HMD-mediated VR experience. PsyArXiv Preprints (2020). https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/uv9sd

  21. Teixeira, J., Palmisano, S.: Effects of dynamic field-of-view restriction on cybersickness and presence in HMD-based virtual reality. Virtual Reality 25, 1–13 (2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-020-00466-2

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement 764951. We would like to thank the participant organization. Due to confidentiality agreement, the names cannot be disclosed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mina Saghafian .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Saghafian, M., Grassini, S., Laumann, K., Skogstad, M.R. (2021). What Factors Contribute to the Perceived Usability of Virtual Reality Technology of Conservative Industrial Consumers. In: Ahram, T.Z., Falcão, C.S. (eds) Advances in Usability, User Experience, Wearable and Assistive Technology. AHFE 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 275. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80091-8_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80091-8_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80090-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80091-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics