Skip to main content

Learning Path Construction Using Reinforcement Learning and Bloom’s Taxonomy

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 12677))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2098 Accesses

Abstract

Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC) often face low course retention rates due to lack of adaptability. We consider the personalized recommendation of learning content units to improve the learning experience, thus increasing retention rates. We propose a deep learning-based learning path construction model for personalized learning, based on knowledge tracing and reinforcement learning. We first trace a student’s knowledge using a deep learning-based knowledge tracing model to estimate its current knowledge state. Then, we adopt a deep reinforcement learning approach and use a student simulator to train a policy for exercise recommendation. During the recommendation process, we incorporate Bloom’s taxonomy’s cognitive level to enhance the recommendation quality. We evaluate our model through a user study and verify its usefulness as a learning tool that supports effective learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.edwith.org.

References

  1. Ai, F., et al.: Concept-aware deep knowledge tracing and exercise recommendation in an online learning system. International Educational Data Mining Society (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, L.W., Bloom, B.S., et al.: A taxonomy for learning, teaching, andassessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman(2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Assami, S., Daoudi, N., Ajhoun, R.: Personalization criteria for enhancing learner engagement in mooc platforms. In: 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), pp. 1265–1272. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. de Barba, P.G., Kennedy, G.E., Ainley, M.: The role of students’ motivation and participation in predicting performance in a mooc. J. Comput. Assisted Learn. 32(3), 218–231 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bloom, B.S.: Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals. Cognitive domain (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Corbett, A.T., Anderson, J.R.: Knowledge tracing: modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Modeling User-adapted Interaction 4(4), 253–278 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Doroudi, S., Aleven, V., Brunskill, E.: Where’s the reward? Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 29(4), 568–620 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Duan, Y., Chen, X., Houthooft, R., Schulman, J., Abbeel, P.: Benchmarking deep reinforcement learning for continuous control. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 1329–1338 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Govindarajan, K., Kumar, V.S., et al.: Dynamic learning path prediction-a learning analytics solution. In: 2016 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Technology for Education (T4E), pp. 188–193. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hone, K.S., El Said, G.R.: Exploring the factors affecting mooc retention: a survey study. Comput. Educ. 98, 157–168 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu, Q., et al.: Exploiting cognitive structure for adaptive learning. In: Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, pp. 627–635 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Onah, D.F., Sinclair, J., Boyatt, R.: Dropout rates of massive open online courses: behavioural patterns. In: EDULEARN14 Proceedings 1, pp. 5825–5834 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Piech, C., et al.: Deep knowledge tracing. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 28, 505–513 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rafferty, A.N., Brunskill, E., Griffiths, T.L., Shafto, P.: Faster teaching by POMDP planning. In: Biswas, G., Bull, S., Kay, J., Mitrovic, A. (eds.) AIED 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6738, pp. 280–287. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21869-9_37

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Reddy, S., Levine, S., Dragan, A.: Accelerating human learning with deep reinforcement learning. In: NIPS Workshop: Teaching Machines, Robots, and Humans (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schulman, J., Levine, S., Abbeel, P., Jordan, M., Moritz, P.: Trust region policy optimization. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 1889–1897 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Thomas, B., Chandra, J.: The effect of bloom’s taxonomy on random forest classifier for cognitive level identification of e-content. In: 2020 International Conference on Emerging Trends in Information Technology and Engineering (ic-ETITE) pp. 1–6. IEEE (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ullah, Z., Lajis, A., Jamjoom, M., Altalhi, A., Saleem, F.: Bloom’s taxonomy: abeneficial tool for learning and assessing students’ competency levels in computer programming using empirical analysis. Computer Applications in Engineering Education (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vitiello, M., Walk, S., Hernández, R., Helic, D., Gütl, C.: Classifying students to improve mooc dropout rates. Research Track, p. 501 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yang, F., Li, F.W., Lau, R.W.: A fine-grained outcome-based learning path model. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 44(2), 235–245 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yu, H., Miao, C., Leung, C., White, T.J.: Towards ai-powered personalization in mooc learning. npj Sci. Learn. 2(1), 1–5 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang, J., Shi, X., King, I., Yeung, D.Y.: Dynamic key-value memory networks for knowledge tracing. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 765–774 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Institute for Information & communications Technology Planning & Evaluation (IITP) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. 2020-0-00368, A Neural-Symbolic Model for Knowledge Acquisition and Inference Techniques).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyeoncheol Kim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kim, S., Kim, W., Kim, H. (2021). Learning Path Construction Using Reinforcement Learning and Bloom’s Taxonomy. In: Cristea, A.I., Troussas, C. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12677. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80421-3_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80421-3_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80420-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80421-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics