Skip to main content

DiKT: Dichotomous Knowledge Tracing

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 12677))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Knowledge tracing models the cognitive process of skill acquisition of a student to predict the current knowledge state. Based on cognitive processing theory, we regard student knowledge state in dichotomous view in alignment with Performance Factor Analysis (PFA). Assuming that a student’s correct and incorrect responses are fundamentally different for modeling a student’s knowledge state, we propose a Dichotomous Knowledge Tracing (DiKT), a novel knowledge tracing network with a dichotomous perspective on a student’s knowledge state. We modify the network’s value memory by dividing it into two memories, each encoding recallable and unrecallable knowledge to precisely capture the student knowledge state. With the proposed architecture, our model generates a knowledge trajectory that instantly and accurately portrays a student’s knowledge level based on learning history. Empirical evaluations demonstrate that our proposed model achieves comparable performance on benchmark educational datasets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://sites.google.com/site/assistmentsdata.

  2. 2.

    https://pslcdatashop.web.cmu.edu/DatasetInfo?datasetId=507.

  3. 3.

    https://github.com/chrispiech/DeepKnowledgeTracing.

References

  1. Corbett, A.T., Anderson, J.R.: Knowledge tracing: modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Model. User-Adap. Interact. 4(4), 253–278 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Craik, F.I., Lockhart, R.S.: Levels of processing: a framework for memory research. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 11(6), 671–684 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Flavell, J.: Cognitive Development. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Huang, Z., Yin, Y., Chen, E., Xiong, H., Su, Y., Hu, G., et al.: EKT: exercise-aware knowledge tracing for student performance prediction. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 33, 100–115 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jensen, J.C.: Skill acquisition and second language teaching. Kinki Univ. Dept. Lang. Educ. J. (3), 119–135 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kingma, D.P., Ba, J.: Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 (2014)

  7. Lovelace, E.A.: Metamemory: monitoring future recallability during study. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 10(4), 756 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., Jones, K.: Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: a meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. US Department of Education (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Miller, A., Fisch, A., Dodge, J., Karimi, A.H., Bordes, A., Weston, J.: Key-value memory networks for directly reading documents. In: Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 1400–1409 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Moeser, S.D.: Levels of processing: qualitative differences or task-demand differences? Mem. Cogn. 11(3), 316–323 (1983). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Morris, C.D., Bransford, J.D., Franks, J.J.: Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 16(5), 519–533 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pavlik, P.I., Jr., Cen, H., Koedinger, K.R.: Performance factors analysis- a new alternative to knowledge tracing. Artif. Intell. Educ. Front. Artif. Intell. Appl. 200, 531–538 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pavlik, P.I., Jr. Eglington, L.G., Harrell-Williams, L.M.: Generalized knowledge tracing: a constrained framework for learner modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.00869 (2020)

  14. Piech, C., et al.: Deep knowledge tracing. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 505–513 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rasch, G.: Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. ERIC (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Self, J.A.: Student models in computer-aided instruction. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 6(2), 261–276 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Thompson, C.P., Wenger, S.K., Bartling, C.A.: How recall facilitates subsequent recall: a reappraisal. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Learn. Mem. 4(3), 210 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tong, H., Zhou, Y., Wang, Z.: HGKT: introducing problem schema with hierarchical exercise graph for knowledge tracing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.16915 (2020)

  19. Vaswani, A., et al.: Attention is all you need. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 5998–6008 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yang, F.M., et al.: Item response theory for measurement validity. Shanghai Arch. Psychiatry 26(3), 171 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yeung, C.K.: Deep-IRT: make deep learning based knowledge tracing explainable using item response theory. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang, J., Shi, X., King, I., Yeung, D.Y.: Dynamic key-value memory networks for knowledge tracing. In: Proceedings of the 26th international conference on World Wide Web, pp. 765–774 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Institute for Information & communications Technology Planning & Evaluation (IITP) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. 2020-0-00368, A Neural-Symbolic Model for Knowledge Acquisition and Inference Techniques).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyeoncheol Kim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kim, S., Kim, W., Jung, H., Kim, H. (2021). DiKT: Dichotomous Knowledge Tracing. In: Cristea, A.I., Troussas, C. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12677. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80421-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80421-3_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80420-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80421-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics