Skip to main content

Implication on Perceived Usefulness of Open Educational Resources After a Rapid Switch to Online Learning Mode

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Blended Learning: Re-thinking and Re-defining the Learning Process. (ICBL 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 12830))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Evolved as open courseware, open online courses and tutorials, open access e-books and open source learning tools, open educational resources or OER are generally perceived as useful resources by university students. Over the last year, many higher education institutions have rapidly switched their usual classroom-based learning to online learning in order to accommodate the social distancing requirements arising from the outbreak of COVID-19. This paper investigates the implication on the students’ perceived usefulness of OER after the switch to online learning. Based on two identical surveys conducted in a university in Hong Kong before and after the change, it is revealed that the students’ perceived usefulness was generally increased, where the increase in perceived usefulness was more significant on open online complete courses, online tutorials, and open access e-books than other types of OER. It is also revealed that the students have become more aware of the shortcomings of OER, especially on accuracy and comprehensiveness. OER, especially open online courses, tutorials, and open access textbooks, are perceived to be useful for students to accommodate a rapid shift to online learning mode.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Tuomi, I.: Open educational resources and the transformation of education. Eur. J. Educ. 48(1), 58–78 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Miao, F., Mishra, S., McGreal, R., (eds.) Open Educational Resources: Policy, Costs and Transformation. UNESCO and Commonwealth of Learning (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hewlett Foundation, The Rich Global Landscape: An Overview of the Development of Open Educational Resources from 2002 to 2019, William and Flora Hewlett Foundation (2021). https://hewlett.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/The-rich-global-landscape-of-OER.pdf

  4. OECD, Giving Knowledge for Free: The Emergence of Open Education Resources, Centre for Educational Research and Innovation, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Website of UNESCO Open Educational Resources, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://en.unesco.org/themes/ict-education/oer

  6. Blomgren, C.: OER awareness and use: the affinity between higher education and K-12. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 19(2), 55–70 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ostashewski, N., Henderson, S.: Creating OER materials: perspectives of global instructors. In: Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, pp. 644–648 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cheung, Simon K.S., Li, K.C., Yuen, K.S.: An overview of open education resources for higher education. In: Lam, J., Li, K.C., Cheung, Simon K.S., Wang, F.L. (eds.) ICT 2013. CCIS, vol. 407, pp. 26–34. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45272-7_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Website of OpenCourseWare, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2021). http://ocw.mit.edu

  10. Website of OpenLearn, The Open University (2021). http://www.open.edu/openlearn

  11. Website of EdX, EdX Inc. (2021). http://www.edx.org

  12. Website of Coursera, Coursera Inc. (2021). http://www.coursera.org

  13. Website of OpenStar CNX, OpenStar, Rice University (2021). http://www.cnx.org

  14. Website of Open Textbook Library, Open Education Network, University of Minnesota (2021). https://open.umn.edu/opentextbooks

  15. Website of Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation (2021). http://www.wikipedia.org

  16. Website of Google for Education, Google Inc. (2021). https://edu.google.com

  17. Cheung, S.K.S.: Distance-learning students’ perception on the usefulness of open educational resources. In: Cheung, S.K.S., Kwok, L.-F., Ma, W.W.K., Lee, L.-K., Yang, H. (eds.) ICBL 2017. LNCS, vol. 10309, pp. 389–399. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59360-9_34

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Cheung, S.K.S.: Perceived usefulness of open educational resources between full-time and distance-learning students. In: Cheung, S.K.S., Kwok, L.-F., Kubota, K., Lee, L.-K., Tokito, J. (eds.) ICBL 2018. LNCS, vol. 10949, pp. 357–367. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94505-7_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Cheung, S.K.S.: A study on the university students’ use of open educational resources for learning purposes. In: Cheung, S.K.S., Jiao, J., Lee, L.-K., Zhang, X., Li, K.C., Zhan, Z. (eds.) ICTE 2019. CCIS, vol. 1048, pp. 146–155. Springer, Singapore (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9895-7_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Website of the Open University of Hong Kong, The Open University of Hong Kong (2021). http://www.ouhk.edu.hk

  21. Tang, H.: A qualitative inquiry of K-12 teachers’ experience with open educational practices: perceived benefits and barriers of implementing open educational resources. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 21(3), 212–229 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Murphy, J.: Open Educational Resources: Question of Quality, Library Guide, Victoria University (2021). https://libraryguides.vu.edu.au/OpenEducationResources

  23. Cheung, K.S., et al.: Open textbooks: engaging education stakeholders to share learning resources. Int. J. Serv. Stand. 10(4), 225–239 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cheung, S.K.S.: A review of open access textbook platforms. In: Cheung, S.K.S., Li, R., Phusavat, K., Paoprasert, N., Kwok, L. (eds.) ICBL 2020. LNCS, vol. 12218, pp. 114–125. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51968-1_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Belikov, O., McLure, M.: A qualitative analysis of open textbook reviews authored by postsecondary educators. Int. J. Open Educ. Resour. 3(2), 77–114 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon K. S. Cheung .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cheung, S.K.S. (2021). Implication on Perceived Usefulness of Open Educational Resources After a Rapid Switch to Online Learning Mode. In: Li, R., Cheung, S.K.S., Iwasaki, C., Kwok, LF., Kageto, M. (eds) Blended Learning: Re-thinking and Re-defining the Learning Process.. ICBL 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12830. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80504-3_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80504-3_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80503-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80504-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics