Abstract
Human Factors and Ergonomics (HFE) academic and professional communities emphasize an interdisciplinary approach to help solve complex problems, particularly for New Product Development (NPD). Data visualization is an effective way of understanding complex data and information. The HFE research community has traditionally used static explanatory graphics to communicate with other disciplines and to support publications and conference presentations. These graphics are typically designed for collaborators and audiences that are familiar with the underlying data or graphical form. While there have been multiple attempts at visually communicating HFE concepts and data to other disciplines, not many attempts have been made to utilize spatio-temporal visualizations to understand the dynamic HFE data. The utilization of the visualized HFE data that are easily consumable in an interdisciplinary team will stimulate the effective application of HFE in NPD. This can also help interdisciplinary teams as well as university students studying tangential subjects like Industrial Design understand this data in order to facilitate NPD. The purpose of this study is to explore data visualization approaches that will help HFE professionals to effectively communicate HFE data to collaborators outside their disciplinary expertise. We conducted a literature review of existing static and dynamic anthropometric data visualizations that have been used by HFE professionals to communicate the results of ergonomic studies. Additionally, we used datasets from a previous intervention design study to develop spatio-temporal visualization examples. Our examples use three-dimensional space as well as the temporal nature of the digital medium in order to communicate a complete picture of the data in a cohesive manner. We developed these examples using the Processing programming language. The developed examples will be utilized to examine the effectiveness of data consumption from non HFE professionals, such as industrial designers, in future studies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Badics, J.: Interdisciplinarity: Essays from the Literature (Brief Article). American Library Association CHOICE (2020)
Edmondson, A.C., Nembhard, I.M.: Product development and learning in project teams: the challenges are the benefits. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 26, 123–138 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00341.x
Re A.: Interdisciplinary research and practice in ergonomics. J. Biol. Res. 85, 53–56 (2012). https://doi.org/10.4081/jbr.2012.4064
McClelland, I.: Marketing ergonomics to industrial designers. Ergonomics 33, 391–398 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139008927142
Fisher, W.: Increasing human factors effectiveness in product design. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting, pp. 471–475 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1518/107118191786754932
Stanton, N.A., Young, M.S.: Giving ergonomics away? The application of ergonomics methods by novices. Appl. Ergon. 34, 479–490 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(03)00067-X
Nickpour, F., Dong, H.: Designing anthropometrics! requirements capture for physical ergonomic data for designers. Des. J. 14, 92–111 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2752/175630610X12877385838849
Tory, M., Möller, T.: Human factors in visualization research. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph 10, 72–84 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2004.1260759
Bishop, I.D., Pettit, C.J., Sheth, F., Sharma, S.: Evaluation of data visualisation options for land-use policy and decision making in response to climate change. Environ. Plan B Plan. Des. 40, 213–233 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1068/b38159
Keim, D., Andrienko, G., Fekete, J.-D., Görg, C., Kohlhammer, J., Melançon, G.: Visual analytics: definition, process, and challenges. In: Kerren, A., Stasko, J.T., Fekete, J.-D., North, C. (eds.) Information Visualization. LNCS, vol. 4950, pp. 154–175. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70956-5_7
Theis, S., et al.: Ergonomic considerations for the design and the evaluation of uncertain data visualizations. In: Yamamoto, S. (ed.) HIMI 2016. LNCS, vol. 9734, pp. 191–202. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40349-6_19
Garneau, C.J., Parkinson, M.B.: A survey of anthropometry and physical accommodation in ergonomics curricula. Ergonomics 59, 143–154 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2015.1052853
Castellucci, H.I., Viviani, C.A., Molenbroek, J.F.M., et al.: Anthropometric characteristics of Chilean workers for ergonomic and design purposes. Ergonomics 62, 459–474 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2018.1540725
Spyropoulos, P., Papathanasiou, G., Georgoudis, G., et al.: Prevalence of low back pain in Greek public office workers. Pain Physician 10, 651–660 (2007)
Castellucci, H.I., Arezes, P.M., Molenbroek, J.F.M., et al.: The influence of school furniture on students’ performance and physical responses: results of a systematic review. Ergonomics 60, 93–110 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2016.1170889
Eldar, R., Fisher-Gewirtzman, D.: Ergonomic design visualization mapping - developing an assistive model for design activities. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 74, 102859 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2019.102859
Harih, G., Čretnik, A.: Interdisciplinary approach to tool-handle design based on medical imaging. BioMed Res. Int. 2013, 1–8 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/159159
Kim, B., Liu, H., Joines, S.: A wearable intervention for laptop users. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. 63, 1188–1193 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181319631165
Sommerich, C.M., Joines, S.M.B., Psihogios, J.P.: Effects of computer monitor viewing angle and related factors on strain, performance, and preference outcomes. Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 43, 39–55 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1518/001872001775992480
Gormley, J.T., Luttringhaus, H.K.: Bridging the Cleavage: a problem of ergonomics education for design students. In: Ergonomics in the Community, Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Ergonomics Society of Australia and New Zealand, pp. 46–61 (1986)
Virizi, R.A.: Refining the test phase of usability evaluation: how many subjects is enough? Hum. Factors 34, 457–468 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1177/001872089203400407
Gonzalez-Franco, M., Ofek, E., Pan, Y., et al.: The Rocketbox library and the utility of freely available rigged avatars. Front. Virtual. Real 1, 1–23 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2020.561558
Gonzalez-Franco, M., Egan, Z., Peachey, M., et al.: MoveBox: democratizing MoCap for the microsoft Rocketbox Avatar Library. In: IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Reality (AIVR), pp. 91–98 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/AIVR50618.2020.00026
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kim, B., Panda, P. (2021). Data Visualizations for Interdisciplinary Communication in HFE. In: Shin, C.S., Di Bucchianico, G., Fukuda, S., Ghim , YG., Montagna, G., Carvalho, C. (eds) Advances in Industrial Design. AHFE 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 260. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80829-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80829-7_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80828-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80829-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)