Skip to main content

Reducing Industry Complexity with International Standards: Current Efforts for Services, E-commerce, Artificial Intelligence

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in the Human Side of Service Engineering (AHFE 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 266))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The global business environment has grown increasing complex due to economic, cultural, demographic, legal, trade, and political (to name a few) changes, differences, and disparity among nations and geographical regions. This complexity is exacerbated by rapid advances in technology which could be employed appropriately as accelerators or inappropriately as barriers to beneficial change to society. One of the ways industries seek to reduce complexity is through the development and use of standards that cover many areas of manufacturing, hardware, software, telecommunication, consumer products, business processes, construction, etc. In the last few decades, the advent of service innovation, e-commerce, and now digital platforms powered by AI have all given rise to international standardization efforts. In this paper we discuss some of these standardization efforts that are service-related and representative which are of interest to the Service Science community with the aim of informing and encouraging stakeholders to participate, contribute, and produce synergy among academic and industry partners.

The contents of this paper represent the opinions of the authors only.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Author 1 participated in the revision of Guide 76 as a member of the ISO/COPOLCO/WG 18 – Consumer Issues in Services.

  2. 2.

    ISO Committee on Consumer Policy (COPOLCO), American National Standards Institute (ANSI), German Institute for Standardization (DIN), European Committee for Standardization (CEN).

  3. 3.

    See [14] for a Service Science perspective of the transformation of retail business by E-Commerce.

  4. 4.

    Author 1 was an observer of this Technical Committee.

  5. 5.

    For example, cross border commerce or doing business as a subsidiary of the parent company in a foreign country such as AliExpress and Rakuten in the US.

  6. 6.

    For example, Gongdao.com is a partnership between Alibaba Group and the municipal government of the City of Hangzhou tasked with processing disputes arising from E-Commerce and other transactions that are within their purview.

  7. 7.

    Both authors are participants of SC 42 by way of their organization’s membership in INCITS.

  8. 8.

    Some of these challenges were cited as leading barriers to AI adoption in a recent survey of the media and consulting company reports by the authors.

  9. 9.

    Both authors are members of IEEE P2840.

References

  1. Spohrer, J., Kwan, S.K.: Service science, management, engineering, and design (SSMED): an emerging discipline – outline and references. Int. J. Inf. Syst. Serv. Sect. 3(1), 1–31 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schiff, D., Ayesh, A., Musikanski, L., Havens, J.C.: IEEE 7010: a new standard for assessing the well-being implications of artificial intelligence. In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), pp. 2746–2753. IEEE (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Su, H.C., Dhanorkar, S., Linderman, K.: A competitive advantage from the implementation timing of ISO management standards. J. Oper. Manag. 1(37), 31–44 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Levinson, M.: The Box: How the Shipping Container Made the World Smaller and the World Economy Bigger. Princeton University Press (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Spohrer, J., Kwan, S.K., Fisk, R.P.: Marketing: a service science and arts perspective. In: Handbook of Service Marketing Research. Edward Elgar Publishing (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Heineke, J., Davis, M.M.: The emergence of service operations management as an academic discipline. J. Oper. Manag. 25(2), 364–374 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kauffman, S.: At home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-organization and Complexity. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Arthur, W.B.: Foundations of Complexity Economics. Nat. Rev. Phys. (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  9. ISO/IEC Guide 76:2020 Development of service standards – Recommendations for addressing consumer issues. https://www.iso.org/standard/73717.html

  10. https://isotc.iso.org/livelink/livelink/Open/8389141 (2020)

  11. ISO 9000:2015(en) Quality management systems—Fundamentals and vocabulary; 3.9.1 modified (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kwan, S.K., Hottum, P.: Maintaining consistent customer experience in service system networks. Serv. Sci. 6(2), 136–147 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kwan, S.K., Müller-Gorchs, M.: Constructing effective value propositions for stakeholders in service system networks. In: Proceedings of SIGSVC Workshop (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Winkler, M., Dosoudil, V.: On formalization of the concept of value proposition. Serv. Sci. 3(3), 194–205 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1287/serv.3.3.194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Weissinger, R., Kwan, S.K.: Service science research and service standards development. In: Satzger, G., Patrício, L., Zaki, M., Kühl, N., Hottum, P. (eds.) IESS 2018. LNBIP, vol. 331, pp. 330–343. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00713-3_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Teboul, J.: Service is Front Stage – Positioning services for value advantage. INSEAD Business Press, Palgrave McMillian (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hänninen, M., Kwan, S.K., Mitronen, L.: From the Store to Omnichannel Retail: Looking Back over Three Decades of Research. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, November 2020

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hänninen, M., Mitronen, L., Kwan, S.K.: Multi-sided marketplaces and the transformation of retail: a service systems perspective. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 49, 380–388 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tan, B., Lin, C., Hung, H.: An ISO 9001:2000 quality information system in e-commerce environment. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 103(9), 666–676 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570310506089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. ISO 8000 Data Quality (many parts) (2020). https://eccma.org/iso-8000/

  21. Probert, S.: What standards for eCommerce? Hangzhou Forum, United Nations Centre for Trade Facilitation and Electronic Business (UN/CEFACT), 16 October 2018

    Google Scholar 

  22. World Trade Organization (WTO). Technical Barrier to Trade (TBT) Agreement

    Google Scholar 

  23. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/tbt_e/tbt_e.htm (1995)

  24. Consumer Federation of America: 2019 Consumer Complaint Survey Report, 27 July 2020

    Google Scholar 

  25. ISO/TC 321 Transaction assurance in E-commerce (2020). https://www.iso.org/committee/7145156.html

  26. Nunez, A.: Amazon, Target, and Walmart forgo return processing and let consumers keep unwanted products in cost-saving push. Business Insiders, 13 January 2021

    Google Scholar 

  27. ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 42 Artificial Intelligence (2020). https://www.iso.org/committee/6794475.html

  28. IEEE P2840 Responsible AI Licensing Working Group. IEEE Computer Society Standards Activity Board Standards Committee (C/SAB SC) (2020). https://standards.ieee.org/project/2840.html

  29. Kwan, S.K., Pietronudo, M.C.: Artificial intelligence – extending the automation spectrum. To be presented at 2020 INFORMS Conference on Service Science, 19–20 December (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rouse, W.B., Spohrer, J.C.: Automating versus augmenting intelligence. J. Enterpr. Transf. 1–21 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Huang, M., Rust, R.T.: Artificial intelligence in service. J. Serv. Res. 21(2), 155–172 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ing, D.: Open Innovation Learning: Theory Building on Open Sourcing While Private Sourcing. Coevolving Press (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Cellary, W., Freund, L.E., Kwan, S.K., Leitner, C., Spohrer, J.: The human-side of service engineering: advancing technologies impact on service innovation. Presented at the Naples Forum on Service, Ischia, Italy, 4–7 June (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Pop, V., Hua, S., Michaels, D.: From lightbulbs to 5G, China battles west for control of vital technology standards. Wall Street J. 7 February 2021

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen K. Kwan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kwan, S.K., Spohrer, J. (2021). Reducing Industry Complexity with International Standards: Current Efforts for Services, E-commerce, Artificial Intelligence. In: Leitner, C., Ganz, W., Satterfield, D., Bassano, C. (eds) Advances in the Human Side of Service Engineering. AHFE 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 266. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80840-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80840-2_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80839-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80840-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics