Skip to main content

Ontologies Cooperation to Model the Needs of Disabled Persons

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence for Knowledge Management (AI4KM 2021)

Abstract

In French society, many aids are proposed for each kind of population. In the particular case of disabled persons, it is quite difficult to deal with all the different information coming from heterogeneous contexts. Such different knowledge cannot be directly integrated, so we propose to build ontologies for each aspect. Then, we manage the cooperation of these distributed ontologies through a relational structure. Finally, to ensure the representation of the guidance interactive process, we model a workflow to follow through the successive steps of an individual file. This file will go with the disabled person, first with its own information, then with some administrative information and lastly with service propositions. The process is recursive allowing a better long-term assistance monitoring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Studer, R., Benjamins, D., Fensel, D.: Knowledge engineering: principles and methods. IEEE Trans. Data Knowl. Eng. 25(1–2), 161–197 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gruber, T.R.: A translation approach to portable ontologies. Knowl. Acquis. 5(2), 199–220 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Doat, D.: Vers une ontologie humaine intégratrice du handicap et de la fragilité en contexte évolutionniste. René-Michel Roberge 69(3), 549–583 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Prise en charge du handicap en France. https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prise_en_charge_du_handicap_en_France. Accessed 24 Feb 2021

  5. Cardoso, S., Aime, X., Meininger, V., Grabli, D., Cohen, K., et al.: De l’intérêt des ontologies modulaires. Application à la modélisation de la prise en charge de la SLA. 29es Journées Francophones d’Ingénierie des Connaissances, IC 2018, AFIA, Nancy, France, pp. 121–128. hal-01839571 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Smith, B., Ceusters, W.: Ontological realism: a methodology for coordinated evolution of scientific ontologies. J. App. Ontol. 5(3–4), 139–188 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. El-Diraby, T.E., Kashif, K.F.: Distributed ontology architecture for knowledge management in highway construction. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 131(5), 591–603 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. ICF: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. World Health Organization Geneva (2001). http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/42407/7/9241545429_tha%2Beng.pdf

  9. French Thesaurus (2012). http://mssh.ehesp.fr/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/THESAURUS-HANDICAP_FINAL_V_3.pdf

  10. Ruggieri, A.P., Elkin, P.L., Solbrig, H., Chute, C.G.: Expression of a domain ontology model in unified modeling language for the World Health Organization International classification of impairment, disability, and handicap, version 2. In: Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium. American Medical Informatics Association (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cuenot, M.: Améliorer les cadres de référence pour le suivi de l’application de la Convention des Nations Unies relative aux droits des personnes handicapées: une illustration à travers le processus de mise à jour de l’International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). ALTER-Eur. J. Disability Res./Revue Européenne de Recherche sur le Handicap 9(1), 64–74 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Arp, R., Smith, B., Spear, A.D.: Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology. MIT Press, Cambridge (2015)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Grenon, P., Smith, B.: SNAP and SPAN: towards dynamic spatial ontology. Spat. Cogn. Comput. 4(1), 69–103 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ferrario, R., Guarino, N.: Towards an ontological foundation for services science. In: Domingue, J., Fensel, D., Traverso, P. (eds.) FIS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5468, pp. 152–169. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00985-3_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Masolo, C., Oltramari, A., Schneider, L.: Sweetening ontologies with DOLCE. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Benjamins, V.R. (eds.) EKAW 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2473, pp. 166–181. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45810-7_18

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Edwards, G., et al.: Disability, rehabilitation research and post-Cartesian embodied ontologies–has the research paradigm changed? In: Environmental Contexts and Disability, pp. 73–102. Emerald Group Publishing Limited (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Smith, B., et al.: IAO-Intel: an ontology of information artifacts in the intelligence domain. In: Laskey, K.B., Costa, P.C.G. (eds.) Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Semantic Technologies for Intelligence, Defense, and Security, Fairfax, VA, (STIDS 2013), vol. 1097, pp. 33–40. CEUR (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pathak, J., Solbrig, H.R., Johnson, T.M., Buntrock, J.D., Chute, C.G.: Survey of modular ontology techniques and their applications in the biomedical domain. Integr. Comput.-Aided Eng. 16(3), 225–242 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. PROV 2013. https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/. Accessed 24 Feb 2021

  20. SERAFIN-PH 2016 NOMENCLATURES BESOINS ET PRESTATIONS DETAILLEES Services et établissements: réforme pour une adéquation des financements aux parcours des personnes handicapées. http://solidarites-sante.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/nomenclatures_serafinphdetaillees_mars_16.pdf

  21. Oborel. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/oborel/obo-relations/master/ro.obo. Accessed 02 Feb 2017

  22. Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I.: The Unified Modeling Language Reference Manual, 550 p. Prentice Hall (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kolodner, J.L.: An introduction to case-based reasoning. Artif. Intell. Rev. 6(1), 3–34 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Aamodt, A., Plaza, E.: Case-based reasoning: foundational issues, methodological variations, and system approaches. AICOM 7(1), 39–59 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bergmann, R., Schaaf, M.: Structural case-based reasoning and ontology-based knowledge management: a perfect match? J. UCS 9(7), 608–626 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Guilaine Talens or Caroline Wintergerst .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Talens, G., Wintergerst, C. (2021). Ontologies Cooperation to Model the Needs of Disabled Persons. In: Mercier-Laurent, E., Kayalica, M.Ö., Owoc, M.L. (eds) Artificial Intelligence for Knowledge Management. AI4KM 2021. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 614. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80847-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80847-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80846-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80847-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics