Skip to main content

Index Management Design as Knowledge Management Enhancers for the Colombian Swine Industry

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Knowledge Management in Organizations (KMO 2021)

Abstract

The Colombian Swine Industry (CSI) has a global importance in agriculture as a sustainable objective worldwide, and it is very attractive for farmers for its short productive cycle, if it is compared to other business lines. Thus, the CSI seeks to encourage profitability, to minimize production cost, to open new markets, and to supply local demand. Therefore, they need to search tools for measuring its key indicators. They have important constrains, for instance the lack of technology, economic benefits, and human resources training. With the above, the article objective is to identify pig producers’ key indicators which could carry to create and share knowledge management. Pig industry key indicators were extracted from the literature. After that, those indicators were contrasted by 19 companies using a Likert scale; then, those were analyzed and grouped according to the Balance Scorecard perspectives using the main component analysis. Finally, a measuring instrument was designed, it was validated by 15 CSI experts, who then applied it to a representative sample of 62 companies in the agricultural sector. Among the most outstanding results were the list of pig industry key indicators and its validation, its importance and measurement level; CSI sustainable indexes inclusion from literature; knowledge creation in pig farmers using indexes for measuring and making decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Trujillo-Diaz, J., Diaz-Piraquive, F.N., Herrera, M.M., Gomez, J.: Modeling the Colombian swine supply chain from a knowledge management perspective. In: Uden, L., Ting, I.H., Corchado, J. (eds.) Knowledge Management in Organizations. KMO 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 1027, pp. 25–35. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21451-7_3

  2. DANE. Encuesta de sacrificio de ganado (ESAG) (Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística (DANE) ed.), 25 August 2018. http://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/estadisticas-por-tema/pobreza-y-condiciones-de-vida/encuesta-nacional-del-uso-del-tiempo-enut?id=131&phpMyAdmin=3om27vamm65hhkhrtgc8rrn2g4

  3. Trujillo-Diaz, J., Diaz-Piraquive, F.N., Herrera, M.M., Gomez-Acero, J.: Identification of global best practices for increasing competitiveness in pig farms in the Colombian central Andean region. Ciencia y tecnología pecuaria 20(4), 507–522 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Trujillo-Diaz, J., Diaz-Piraquive, F.N., Herrera, M.M., Gomez, J., Rodriguez, J.A., Sarmiento, H.R.: Design of theoretical dimensions for a knowledge management model applied to the Colombian Swine Industry. Presented at the CONIITI, Universidad Católica de Colombia, Bogota - Colombia, 2nd October 2019 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  5. 3tres3. Economia - Precios del cerdo (3tres3 - Comunidad Profesional Porcina ed.), 15th May. https://www.3tres3.com/cotizaciones-de-porcino/

  6. Machlup, F.: The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bell, D.: The coming of the post-industrial society. In: The Educational Forum, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 574–579. Taylor & Francis (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Drucker, P.: The Age of Discontinuity: Guidelines to Our Changing Society. Routledge, Milton Park (2017)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Nonaka, I.: A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. 5(1), 14–37 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kogut, B., Zander, U.: Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. 3(3), 383–397 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Grant, R.M.: Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strateg. Manag. J. 17(S2), 109–122 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H.: The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Davenport, T.H., Prusak, L.: Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Harvard Business Press, Boston (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Castillo, H.G.C.: El modelo de la triple hélice como un medio para la vinculación entre la universidad y empresa. Revista Nacional de administración 1(1), 85–94 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H.: The knowledge-creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Long Range Plan. 4(29), 592 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McAdam, R., McCreedy, S.: A critical review of knowledge management models. Learn. Organ. 6(3), 91–101 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Boisot, M.: Information and Organizations: The Manager as Anthropologist. Fontana, London (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nickols, F.: KM overview (2000). http://home.att.net/~discon/KM/KM_Overview_Context.htm. Accessed 18 Oct 2015

  19. Wigg, K.: Knowledge management foundations (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  20. McElroy, M.W.: The New Knowledge Management: Complexity, Learning, and Sustainable (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rollett, H.: Knowledge Management: Processes and Technologies. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bukowitz, W.R., Williams, R.L.: The Knowledge Management Fieldbook. Financial Times/Prentice Hall (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zack, M.H.: Managing codified knowledge. Sloan Manag. Rev. 40(4), 45–58 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Peng Wong, W., Yew Wong, K.: Supply chain management, knowledge management capability, and their linkages towards firm performance. Bus. Process Manag. J. 17(6), 940–964 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Soto, M.M.: System dynamics in the simulation of the effect of knowledge management on the supply chain of corn agroindustry (Zea mays L.). Revista Técnica de la Facultad de Ingeniería Universidad del Zulia 36(1) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kant, R., Singh, M.: An integrative framework of knowledge management enabled supply chain management. In: 2008 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, pp. 53–57. IEEE (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hoffmann, V.E., Lopes, G.S.C., Medeiros, J.J.: Knowledge transfer among the small businesses of a Brazilian cluster. J. Bus. Res. 67(5), 856–864 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. da Silva, E.F., Mafra Pereira, F.C., Guimaraes Rodrigues, E.H.: Creation of organizational knowledge on the basis Von Krogh, Nonaka and Ichijo capacitors: a case study in the grange DF Pork Company. Int. J. Innov. 4(2), 155–172 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. AHDB and BPEX. Profitability in the Pig Supply Chain. https://pork.ahdb.org.uk/media/2338/profitability_in_the_pig_supply_chain.pdf

  30. Duflot, B., Roussillon, M., Rieu, M.: A competitiveness index for national pork chains in Europe: for the years 2010, 2011 and 2012. Cahiers de l’IFIP 1(1), 29–45 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nogueira, M., Greis, N.: An answer set programming solution for supply chain traceability. In: Fred, A., Dietz, J.L.G., Liu, K., Filipe, J. (eds.) IC3K 2012. CCIS, vol. 415, pp. 211–227. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54105-6_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Kurtz, D.J., Soriano Sierra, E.J., Varvakis, G.: Fluxo de conhecimento interorganizacional: estudo de múltiplos casos em uma cadeia produtiva. Espacios 34(4), 9 (2013). (in Portuguese)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wognum, N., Wever, M.: Quality and co-ordination in supply chains - the case of pork chains in the Netherlands. In: IEEE International Technology Management Conference, ICE 2008. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Chiran, A., Gîndu, E., Ungureanu, G., Drobotǎ, B., Jitǎreanu, A.F.: Designing an informatics’ system regarding the technical-economic and financial analysis of integrated agro alimentary units. In: 15th International Business Information Management Association Conference, IBIMA 2010, Cairo, vol. 2, pp. 1160–1165. International Business Information Management Association, IBIMA (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Paranhos da Costa, M.J.R., Huertas, S.M., Gallo, C., Dalla Costa, O.A.: Strategies to promote farm animal welfare in Latin America and their effects on carcass and meat quality traits. Meat Sci. 92(3), 221–226 (2012). (in English)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang, K., Chai, Y., Weng, D., Zhai, R.: Analysis and design of information traceability system for pork production supply chain. Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 26(4), 332–339 (2010). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Arboníes, Á.L., Azúa, S.: Cómo evitar la miopía en la gestión del conocimiento. Díaz de Santos (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Marshall, A.: Principles of Economics. Macmillan, London (1920)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Nonaka, I.: The Knowledge-Creating Company. Harvard Business Review Press, Boston (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hedlund, G.: A model of knowledge management and the N-form corporation. Strateg. Manag. J. 15(S2), 73–90 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Johnston, R., Blumentritt, R.: Knowledge moves to center stage. Sci. Commun. 20(1), 99–105 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Swan, J., Newell, S.: Linking knowledge management and innovation. In: ECIS 2000 Proceedings, p. 173 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Meyer, M., Zack, M.: The design and implementation of information products. Sloan Manag. Rev. 37(3), 43–59 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Jordan, J., Jones, P.: Assessing your company’s knowledge management style. Long Range Plan. 30(3), 392–398 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Patil, N.Y., Warkhedkar, R.M.: Knowledge management implementation in Indian automobile ancillary industries: an interpretive structural model for productivity. J. Model. Manag. 11(3), 802–810 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Patil, S.K., Kant, R.: A hybrid approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL and FMCDM to predict success of knowledge management adoption in supply chain. Appl. Soft Comput. 18, 126–135 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Cyrino, A.B., Parente, R., Dunlap, D., de Góes, B.B.: A critical assessment of Brazilian manufacturing competitiveness in foreign markets. Competitiveness Rev. Int. Bus. J. 27(3), 253–274 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Wiig, K.: Knowledge Management Foundations: thinking about-how people and organizations create, represent, and use knowledge. Schema, Arlington, Texas (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Acar, M.F., Tarim, M., Zaim, H., Zaim, S., Delen, D.: Knowledge management and ERP: complementary or contradictory? Int. J. Inf. Manag. 37(6), 703–712 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Irani, Z., Sharif, A., Kamal, M.M., Love, P.E.: Visualising a knowledge mapping of information systems investment evaluation. Expert Syst. Appl. 41(1), 105–125 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Bagheri, M.M.: Investigate the effect of information systems on supply chains with mediation of knowledge management in Iran Khodro Company. Int. Bus. Manag. 10(18), 4153–4162 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Li, Y., Liu, Y., Liu, H.: Co-opetition, distributor’s entrepreneurial orientation and manufacturer’s knowledge acquisition: evidence from China. J. Oper. Manag. 29(1–2), 128–142 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Mazzola, E., Perrone, G.: A strategic needs perspective on operations outsourcing and other inter-firm relationships. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 144(1), 256–267 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Chong, A.Y.-L., Bai, R.: Predicting open IOS adoption in SMEs: an integrated SEM-neural network approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 41(1), 221–229 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  55. Chen, Y.-H., Lin, T.-P., Yen, D.C.: How to facilitate inter-organizational knowledge sharing: the impact of trust. Inf. Manag. 51(5), 568–578 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Maçada, A.C.G., Costa, J.C., Oliveira, M., Curado, C.: Information management and knowledge sharing in supply chains operating in Brazil. Int. J. Automot. Technol. Manag. 13(1), 18–35 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Machikita, T., Ueki, Y.: Knowledge transfer channels to Vietnam for process improvement. Manag. Decis. 51(5), 954–972 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Briscoe, G., Dainty, A.R., Millett, S.: Construction supply chain partnerships: skills, knowledge and attitudinal requirements. Eur. J,. Purchasing Supply Manag. 7(4), 243–255 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Choi, T.Y., Budny, J., Wank, N.: Intellectual property management: a knowledge supply chain perspective. Bus. Horiz. 47(1), 37–44 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Weiss, D., Minshall, T.: Negative effects of relative proximity and absolute geography on open innovation practices in high-tech SMEs in the UK. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology (ICMIT), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Huang, H.-C.: Designing a knowledge-based system for strategic planning: a balanced scorecard perspective. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(1), 209–218 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Lesáková, Ľ., Dubcová, K.: Knowledge and use of the balanced scorecard method in the businesses in the Slovak Republic. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 230, 39–48 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Manville, G., Karakas, F., Polkinghorne, M., Petford, N.: Supporting open innovation with the use of a balanced scorecard approach: a study on deep smarts and effective knowledge transfer to SMEs. Prod. Plan. Control 30(10–12), 842–853 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Moraga, J.A., Quezada, L.E., Palominos, P.I., Oddershede, A.M., Silva, H.A.: A quantitative methodology to enhance a strategy map. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 219, 43–53 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Chytas, P., Glykas, M., Valiris, G.: A proactive balanced scorecard. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 31(5), 460–468 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Hoque, Z., Kaplan, R.S.: The balanced scorecard: comments on balanced scorecard commentaries. J. Account. Organ. Change 8, 539–545 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Casas, M., Perez, M., Rojas, J., Alvarez, J.: Strategic planning model to improve competitiveness for service industry SMEs using the balanced scorecard. In: Ahram, T., Taiar, R., Colson, S., Choplin, A. (eds.) IHIET 2019. AISC, vol. 1018, pp. 1001–1006. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25629-6_155

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  68. Chong, P., Ong, T., Abdullah, A., Choo, W.: Internationalisation and innovation on balanced scorecard (BSC) among Malaysian small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Manag. Sci. Lett. 9(10), 1617–1632 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Kalender, Z.T., Vayvay, Ö.: The fifth pillar of the balanced scorecard: sustainability. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 235, 76–83 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Hu, Y., Xiao, S., Wen, J., Li, J.: An ANP-multi-criteria-based methodology to construct maintenance networks for agricultural machinery cluster in a balanced scorecard context. Comput. Electron. Agric. 158, 1–10 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Myung, J.K., An, H.-T., Lee, S.-Y.: Corporate competitiveness index of climate change: a balanced scorecard approach. Sustainability 11(5), 1445 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Zeng, K., Luo, X.: The balanced scorecard in China: does it work? Bus. Horiz. 56(5), 611–620 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Harvey, H.B., Sotardi, S.T.: Key performance indicators and the balanced scorecard. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 15(7), 1000–1001 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Al-Qubaisi, S.S., Ajmal, M.: Determinants of operational efficiency in the oil and gas sector: a balanced scorecards perspective. Benchmarking Int. J. 25(9), 3357–3385 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Gibbons, R., Kaplan, R.S.: Formal measures in informal management: can a balanced scorecard change a culture? Am. Econ. Rev. 105(5), 447–451 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Oliveira, H.C., Lima-Rodrigues, L., Craig, R.: The presence of bureaucracy in the balanced scorecard. Revista de Contabilidad-Spanish Account. Rev. 22(2), 218–224 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Leksono, E.B., Suparno, S., Vanany, I.: Integration of a balanced scorecard, DEMATEL, and ANP for measuring the performance of a sustainable healthcare supply chain. Sustainability 11(13), 3626 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Teniwut, Y.K.: Decision support system for increasing sustainable productivity on fishery agroindustry supply chain. In: 2013 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems (ICACSIS), pp. 297–302. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  79. Valenzuela, L., Maturana, S.: Designing a three-dimensional performance measurement system (SMD3D) for the wine industry: a Chilean example. Agric. Syst. 142, 112–121 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Hristov, I., Chirico, A., Appolloni, A.: Sustainability value creation, survival, and growth of the company: a critical perspective in the sustainability balanced scorecard (SBSC). Sustainability 11(7), 2119 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Kuncová, M., Hedija, V., Fiala, R.: Firm size as a determinant of firm performance: the case of swine raising. Agris On-Line Pap. Econ. Inform. 8(665-2016-45098), 77–89 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  82. Muda, I., Erlina, I.Y., Nasution, A.A.: Performance audit and balanced scorecard perspective. Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol. 9(5), 1321–1333 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  83. Sampieri Hernández, R., Fernandez Collado, C., del Pilar Baptista Lucio, M.: Metodología de la Investigación, 6th edn. MrGraw-Hill, México (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  84. Kithinji, K.R., Kanui, T.I., Ndathi, A.J., Mwobobia, R.M.: Characterization of pig production systems in Embu west sub county, Embu County, Kenya (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  85. Paixão, G., Esteves, A., Payan-Carreira, R.: Characterization of a non-industrial pig production system: the case of Bísaro breed. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 47 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  86. Ieda, N., Van Bui, Q., Nguyen, N.T.D., Lapar, L., Marshall, K.: Characterization of smallholder pig breeding practices within a rural commune of North Central Vietnam. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 47(6), 1005–1016 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-015-0817-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. PorkColombia. Boletín - Ronda de precios # 34 (PorkColombia ed.), 28 August 2018. https://www.miporkcolombia.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Semana34de2018.pdf

  88. Selva, G.: Analysis of the Competitiveness of the Pork Industry in Denmark (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  89. Hoste, R.: International comparison of pig production costs 2015 (2017). https://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/wurpubs/fulltext/412970

  90. Ménard, C.: The economics of hybrid organizations. J. Inst. Theor. Econ. JITE 160(3), 345–376 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Raynaud, E., Sauvee, L., Valceschini, E.: Alignment between quality enforcement devices and governance structures in the agro-food vertical chains. J. Manag. Gov. 9(1), 47–77 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Martins, F.M., Trienekens, J., Omta, O.: Differences in quality governance: the case of the Brazilian pork chain. Br. Food J. 119(12), 2837–2850 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Fernández, M., Millán, G., Calvetty Ramos, M., Basso, M., Mouteira, M.C.: Efectos sobre el suelo de efluentes de producción porcina intensiva. In: XIX Jornadas de Divulgación Técnico-Científicas, VI Jornada Latinoamericana, IV Jornadas de Ciencia y Tecnología y III Reunión Transdisciplinaria en Ciencias Agropecuarias (Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias y Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Rosario) (Casilda y Zavalla, 16 y 17 de agosto de 2018) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pablo Cesar Gómez-Silva .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gómez-Silva, P.C., Diaz-Piraquive, F.N., Trujillo-Diaz, J. (2021). Index Management Design as Knowledge Management Enhancers for the Colombian Swine Industry. In: Uden, L., Ting, IH., Wang, K. (eds) Knowledge Management in Organizations. KMO 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1438. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81635-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81635-3_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-81634-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-81635-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics