Skip to main content

Understanding How Patient, Caregiver and Healthcare Professional Come Together During Treatment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Knowledge Management in Organizations (KMO 2021)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1438))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper aims at clarifying actors, associations and treatment flow that patient, caregiver and healthcare professional undergo; at identifying shared contexts (“ba”) and their overlap for self-transcendence; at looking at the actors and associations as activity systems to understand the activities and actions executed, and expected to be executed, by the actors (division of labor) to visualize boundaries for transformation. Qualitative data was gathered through open-ended questionnaires distributed to healthcare professionals and caregivers in Japan, Singapore and Brazil. Hermeneutic analysis and interpretation of the answers were conducted to draw findings and implications; data generated from these went through framework method of analysis in three levels: Actor-Network Theory to identify actors, associations and treatment flow; Knowledge-Creation Theory’s shared context; as activity systems to clarify the division of labor. Three actors were found: patient, healthcare professional, and caregiver. The consultation is central to treatment flow as it is when one shared context emerges among actors, assessment is conducted, and tasks are assigned. This is a preliminary study which lays the foundation for our ongoing research, so the implications are targeted at the researchers: necessity to clarify what sort of negotiations and translations usually take and the role of technology in it; identify where and how actors become attuned to focus on where and how self-transcendence happens; understand actions to visualize boundaries for transformation. This is a first attempt to analyze patient-healthcare professional-caregiver relationship combining the Actor-Network Theory, “ba” and Activity Theory’s division of labor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhao, J., Wang, T., Fan, X.: Patient value co-creation in online health communities: social identity effects on customer knowledge contributions and membership continuance intentions in online health communities. J. Serv. Manag. 26(1), 72–96 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hojat, M.: The interpersonal dynamics in clinician–patient relationships. In: Hojat, M. (ed.) Empathy in Patient Care: Antecedents, Development, Measurement, and Outcomes, pp. 117–139. Springer, New York (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-33608-7_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Sakai, E.Y., Carpenter, B.D.: Linguistic features of power dynamics in triadic dementia diagnostic conversations. Patient Educ. Couns. 85(2), 295–298 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sayes, E.: Actor-network theory and methodology: just what does it mean to say that nonhumans have agency? Soc. Stud. Sci. 44(1), 134–149 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Saito, M.: Current issues regarding family caregiving and gender equality in Japan: male caregivers and the interplay between caregiving and masculinities. Japan Labor Rev. 14(1), 92–111 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kusaba, T., et al.: Influence of family dynamics on burden among family caregivers in aging Japan. Fam. Pract. 33(5), 466–470 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Vasconcellos-Silva, P.R., Rivera, F.J.U., Siebeneichler, F.B.: Healthcare organizations, linguistic communities, and the emblematic model of palliative care. Cad. Saude Publica 23(7), 1529–1538 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mazer, B.L., Cameron, R.A., DeLuca, J.M., Mohile, S.G., Epstein, R.M.: “Speaking-for” and “speaking-as”: Pseudo-surrogacy in physician–patient–companion medical encounters about advanced cancer. Patient Educ. Couns. 96(1), 36–42 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Epstein, R.M., Street, R.L.: Shared mind: communication, decision making, and autonomy in serious illness. Ann. Family Med. 9(5), 454–461 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Laidsaar-Powell, R., et al.: The TRIO framework: conceptual insights into family caregiver involvement and influence throughout cancer treatment decision-making. Patient Educ. Couns. 100(11), 2035–2046 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mendes, V.L.F., Molini-Avejonas, D.R., Ribeiro, A., Souza, L.A.P.: The collective construction of a guide for caregivers of bedridden patients: experience report. J. Soc. Bras. Fonoaudiol. 23(3), 281–287 (2011). http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-64912011000300016&lng=en&nrm=iso

  12. Linderholm, M., Friedrichsen, M.: A desire to be seen: family caregivers’ experiences of their caring role in palliative home care. Cancer Nurs. 33(1), 28–36 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nonaka, I., Reinmoeller, P., Senoo, D.: The ‘ART’ of knowledge: systems to capitalize on market knowledge. Eur. Manag. J. 16(6), 673–684 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Weick, K.E.: Sensemaking in Organizations. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Latour, B.: On Actor-network Theory: A Few Clarifications. Soziale Welt 47(4), 369–381 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Engestrom, Y.: The new generation of expertise. Seven theses. In: Rainbird, H., Fuller, A., Munro, A. (eds.) Workplace Learning in Context, pp. 145–165. Routledge, London (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gale, N.K., Heath, G., Cameron, E., Rashid, S., Redwood, S.: Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 13, 117 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Froehle, C.M., Roth, A.V.: New measurement scales for evaluating perceptions of the technology-mediated customer service experience. J. Oper. Manag. 22(1), 1–21 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Callon, M.: Techno-economic networks and irreversibility. Sociol. Rev. 38(1_suppl), 132–161 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Callon, M.: Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. Sociol. Rev. 32(1_suppl), 196–233 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kerosuo, H.: Boundaries in health care discussions: an activity theoretical approach to the analysis of boundaries. In: Paulsen, N., Hernes, T. (eds.) Managing Boundaries in Organizations: Multiple Perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan, London (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nonaka, I., Konno, N.: The concept of “Ba”: Building a foundation for knowledge creation. Calif. Manag. Rev. 40(3), 40–54 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa Ribeiro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ribeiro, L., Senoo, D. (2021). Understanding How Patient, Caregiver and Healthcare Professional Come Together During Treatment. In: Uden, L., Ting, IH., Wang, K. (eds) Knowledge Management in Organizations. KMO 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1438. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81635-3_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81635-3_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-81634-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-81635-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics