Skip to main content

An Organic Computing System for Automated Testing

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Architecture of Computing Systems (ARCS 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 12800))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 642 Accesses

Abstract

Testing is a vital part of the development of a new software product. With the rise of test automation, companies more and more rely on large sets of test cases. This leads to situations in which it is unfeasible to run all tests due to a limited time budget which eventually results in the need for selecting an optimal subset of tests to execute. Recently, this test selection problem has been approached using machine learning methods. In this work, we design an Organic Computing (OC) system which makes use of these methods. While OC design techniques have originally been targeted at creating embedded systems, we show that these methodologies can be employed to software verification as well. We are able to demonstrate that the implemented system is a robust and highly autonomous solution which fits modern development practices such as continuous integration well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the original MLOC variant the monitoring focuses on one isolated agent.

  2. 2.

    For example Bosch and Siemens home appliances are from the same producer and a Bosch home appliance often shares many things with a Siemens one.

  3. 3.

    We decided to use a Friedman test over a more widespread ANOVA test as it does not require equality of variance. The latter is not given here which renders an ANOVA analysis unfeasible.

References

  1. Angara, J., Gutta, S., Prasad, S.: DevOps with continuous testing architecture and its metrics model. In: Sa, P.K., Bakshi, S., Hatzilygeroudis, I.K., Sahoo, M.N. (eds.) Recent Findings in Intelligent Computing Techniques. AISC, vol. 709, pp. 271–281. Springer, Singapore (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8633-5_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Dingsyr, T., Dyb, T., Moe, N.B.: Agile Software Development: Current Research and Future Directions, 1st edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12575-1

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Dustin, E., Rashka, J., Paul, J.: Automated Software Testing: Introduction, Management, and Performance. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co. Inc., Boston (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ferguson, J.: Jenkins: The Definitive Guide. O’Reilly, Beijing (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Herzig, K., Greiler, M., Czerwonka, J., Murphy, B.: The art of testing less without sacrificing quality. In: 2015 IEEE/ACM 37th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering, vol. 1, pp. 483–493 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jfrog: Jfrog Artifactory (2020). https://jfrog.com/artifactory/. Accessed 26 Jan 2021

  7. Larman, C., Vodde, B.: Scaling Lean and Agile Development: Thinking and Organizational Tools for Large-Scale Scrum, 1st edn. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lazic, L., Mastorakis, N.: Cost effective software test metrics, vol. 7 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Müller-Schloer, C., Schmeck, H., Ungerer, T.: Organic Computing - A Paradigm Shift for Complex Systems, 1st edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-0130-0

  10. Prothmann, H., et al.: Decentralised route guidance in organic traffic control (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Qu, X., Cohen, M.B., Woolf, K.M.: Combinatorial interaction regression testing: a study of test case generation and prioritization. In: 2007 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance, pp. 255–264 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rosenbauer, L., Pätzel, D., Stein, A., Hähner, J.: Transfer learning for automated test case prioritization using XCSF. In: Castillo, P.A., Jiménez Laredo, J.L. (eds.) EvoApplications 2021. LNCS, vol. 12694, pp. 681–696. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72699-7_43

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Rosenbauer, L., Stein, A., Pätzel, D., Hähner, J.: XCSF with experience replay for automatic test case prioritization. In: 2020 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rudolph, S.: Mutual Influences in Self adaptive and Autonomously Learning Systems. Ph.D. thesis (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schmeck, H., Müller-Schloer, C., Çakar, E., Mnif, M., Richter, U.: Adaptivity and self-organisation in organic computing systems. In: Müller-Schloer, C., Schmeck, H., Ungerer, T. (eds.) Organic Computing—A Paradigm Shift for Complex Systems. ASYS, vol. 1, pp. 5–37. Springer, Basel (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-0130-0_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Spieker, H., Gotlieb, A., Marijan, D., Mossige, M.: Reinforcement Learning for Automatic Test Case Prioritization and Selection in Continuous Integration. In: Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis. p. 12–22. ISSTA 2017, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stein, A., Maier, R., Rosenbauer, L., Hähner, J.: XCS classifier system with experience replay. In: Proceedings of the 2020 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference. GECCO 2020, pp. 404–413. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ståhl, D., Bosch, J.: Modeling continuous integration practice differences in industry software development. J. Syst. Softw. 87, 48–59 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ståhl, D., Bosch, J.: Cinders: the continuous integration and delivery architecture framework. Inf. Softw. Technol. 83, 76–93 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tomforde, S., et al.: Decentralised progressive signal systems for organic traffic control. In: 2008 Second IEEE International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems, pp. 413–422 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Urbanowicz, R.J., Browne, W.N.: Introduction to Learning Classifier Systems, 1st edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55007-6

  22. Wilson, S.W.: Classifier fitness based on accuracy. Evol. Comput. 3(2), 149–175 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yoo, S., Harman, M.: Regression testing minimization, selection and prioritization: a survey. Softw. Test. Verif. Reliab. 22(2), 67–120 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lukas Rosenbauer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rosenbauer, L., Pätzel, D., Stein, A., Hähner, J. (2021). An Organic Computing System for Automated Testing. In: Hochberger, C., Bauer, L., Pionteck, T. (eds) Architecture of Computing Systems. ARCS 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12800. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81682-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81682-7_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-81681-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-81682-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics