Skip to main content

Topic Modeling Based on ICD Codes for Clinical Documents

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Systems and Applications (IntelliSys 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 295))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 967 Accesses

Abstract

We proposed two ICD-based topic modeling methods, named ICD-1 and ICD-2, which can generate topics based on the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes assigned to the documents. We applied the two methods to the Pittsburgh EHR dataset. For comparison, we also ran LDA on the same dataset to generate topics. Then we experimented with the three topic models on both document retrieval and sentence retrieval. As a baseline, we performed both retrievals using a keyword-matching method named TF-IDF. We evaluated the results using three methods: precision at ten (P@10), document ranking correlation, and sentence relevance determination (in terms of precision, recall, and F-score), which were based on the review and annotation made on the retrieved documents by two medical experts. In the P@10 evaluation, ICD-2 method achieved the highest average P@10 value of 0.61. In document ranking correlation, ICD-1 method achieved the highest Pearson’s correlation coefficient of 0.709. In sentence relevance determination, ICD-1 method achieved the highest F-score of 0.655. Overall, the ICD-based methods outperformed LDA and TF-IDF in the experiment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jha, A.K., DesRoches, C.M., Kralovec, P.D., Joshi, M.S.: A progress report on electronic health records in U.S. hospitals. Health Aff. 29(10), 1951–1957 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Schuemie, M.J., Sen, E., t Jong, G.W., van Soest, E.M., Sturkenboom, M.C., Kors, J.A.: Automating classification of free-text electronic health records for epidemiological studies. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 21(6), 651–658 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yli-Hietanen, J., Niiranen, S., Aswell, M., Nathanson, L.: Domain-specific analytical language modeling–the chief complaint as a case study. Int. J. Med. Inf. 78(12), e27-30 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hripcsak, G., Friedman, C., Alderson, P.O., DuMouchel, W., Johnson, S.B., Clayton, P.D.: Unlocking clinical data from narrative reports: a study of natural language processing. Ann. Intern. Med. 122(9), 681–688 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Steyvers, M., Griffiths, T.: Probabilistic topic models. In: Latent Semantic Analysis: A Road to Meaning. Laurence Erlbaum (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., Jordan, M.I.: Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 993–1022 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Blei, D.M., McAuliffe, J.D.: Supervised topic models. In: Neural Information Processing Systems 2007 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ramage, D., Hall, D., Nallapati, R., Manning, C.D.: Labeled LDA: a supervised topic model for credit attribution in multi-labeled corpora. In: Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 248–256 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cohen, R., Aviram, I., Elhadad, M., Elhadad, N.: Redundancy-aware topic modeling for patient record notes. PLoS ONE 9(2), e87555 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wei, X., Croft, W.B.: LDA-based document models for ad-hoc retrieval. SIGIR Forum 39, 178–185 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bisgin, H., Liu, Z., Fang, H., Xu, X., Tong, W.: Mining FDA drug labels using an unsupervised learning technique–topic modeling. BMC Bioinform. 12(Suppl 10), S11 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen, Y., Yin, X., Li, Z., Hu, X., Huang, J.X.: A LDA-based approach to promoting ranking diversity for genomics information retrieval. BMC Genomics 13(Suppl 3), S2 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Arnold, C.W., El-Saden, S.M., Bui, A.A., Taira, R.: Clinical case-based retrieval using latent topic analysis. IN: AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings/AMIA Symposium AMIA Symposium 2010, pp. 26–30 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zeng, Q.T., Redd, D., Rindflesch, T., Nebeker, J.: Synonym, topic model and predicate-based query expansion for retrieving clinical documents. In: AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings/AMIA Symposium AMIA Symposium 2012, pp. 1050–1059 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shea, A.M., Curtis, L.H., Szczech, L.A., Schulman, K.A.: Sensitivity of international classification of diseases codes for hyponatremia among commercially insured outpatients in the United States. BMC Nephrol. 9, 5 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Guidelines for the 2012 TREC Medical Records Track. http://www-nlpir.nist.gov/projects/trecmed/2012

  17. Edinger, T., Cohen, A.M., Bedrick, S., Ambert, K., Hersh, W.: Barriers to retrieving patient information from electronic health record data: failure analysis from the TREC Medical Records Track. In: AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings/AMIA Symposium AMIA Symposium 2012, pp. 180–188 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zeng, Q.T., Redd, D., Divita, G., Jarad, S., Brandt, C., Nebeker, J.R.: Characterizing clinical text and sublanguage: a case study of the VA clinical notes. J. Health Med. Informat. S3, 001 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. MALLET: A machine learning for language toolkit. http://mallet.cs.umass.edu

  20. Wallach, H., Murray, I., Salakhutdinov, R., Mimno, D.: Evaluation methods for topic models. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Machine Learning (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Newman, D., Lau, J.H., Grieser, K., Baldwin, T.: Automatic evaluation of topic coherence. In: Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the ACL, pp. 100–108 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chang, J., Boyd-Graber, J., Wang, C., Gerrish, S., Blei, D.M.: Reading tea leaves: how humans interpret topic models. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 22, pp. 288–296 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bui, D., Redd, D., Rindflesch, T., Zeng-Treitler, Q.: An ensemble approach for expanding queries. In: Proceedings of The Twenty-First Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 2012) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by VA grants CHIR HIR 08-374 and VINCI HIR-08-204.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yijun Shao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Shao, Y., Morris, R.S., Bray, B.E., Zeng-Treitler, Q. (2022). Topic Modeling Based on ICD Codes for Clinical Documents. In: Arai, K. (eds) Intelligent Systems and Applications. IntelliSys 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 295. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82196-8_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics