Skip to main content

Girls and Technology – Insights from a Girls-Only Team at a Reengineered Educational Robotics Summer Camp

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Robotics in Education (RiE 2021)

Abstract

In this paper, we present the results from a case study on an annual extra-curricular summer camp, in which participants (n = 126) engaged in STEM and Computational Thinking activities, facilitated through the usage of the micro:bit microcontroller platform. The camp was a reengineered version of an annual summer camp held by Teknologiskolen; a Danish non-profit organisation offering weekly classes in technology. The focus of the reengineering was to increase the number of girls participating in the camp. This was attempted by creating a girls-only team, which employed highly contextualised projects and had an emphasis on using everyday materials, like cardboard, paint and glue. The result was a significant increase in the number of participating girls and on their attitude towards technology, which at the end of the camp, matched that of the boys. Based on the results, we argue that the girls-only team was the main reason for the higher number of participating girls, while the change in attitude was due to the highly contextualised projects and selection of materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Teknologiskolen. Teknologiskolen (2020). [cited January the 22nd, 2021]; https://www.teknologiskolen.dk/

  2. Future, E.T.: Prognose for STEM-mangel 2025 (2018). Engineer the Future: engineerthefuture.dk

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schoolnet, E.: European Schoolnet’s 2017 Annual Report. 2018: eun.org - Brussels, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wing, J.M.: Computational thinking. Commun. ACM 49(3), 33–35 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Atmatzidou, S., Demetriadis, S.: Advancing students’ computational thinking skills through educational robotics: a study on age and gender relevant differences. Robot. Auton. Syst. 75, 661–670 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Blanchard, S., Freiman, V., Lirrete-Pitre, N.: Strategies used by elementary schoolchildren solving robotics-based complex tasks: Innovative potential of technology. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2(2), 2851–2857 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sáez-López, J.-M., Sevillano-García, M.-L., Vazquez-Cano, E.: The effect of programming on primary school students’ mathematical and scientific understanding: educational use of mBot. Educ. Tech. Res. Dev. 67(6), 1405–1425 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09648-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Papert, S., Harel, I.: Constructionism: research reports and essays, 1985–1990. 1991: Ablex publishing corporation (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wilson, B.G.: Constructivist learning environments: case studies in instructional design. 1996: Educational Technology (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Corbett, C., Hill, C.: Solving the Equation: The Variables for Women's Success in Engineering and Computing. 2015: ERIC (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. García-Holgado, A., et al.: European proposals to work in the gender gap in STEM: a systematic analysis. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje 15(3), 215–224 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. García-Holgado, A., et al.: Trends in studies developed in Europe focused on the gender gap in STEM. In: Proceedings of the XX International Conference on Human Computer Interaction (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Peixoto, A., et al.: Diversity and inclusion in engineering education: looking through the gender question. In: 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON). IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Master, A., et al.: Programming experience promotes higher STEM motivation among first-grade girls 160, 92–106 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Craig, M., Horton, D.: Gr8 designs for Gr8 girls: a middle-school program and its evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 40th ACM technical symposium on Computer Science Education (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mason, R., Cooper, G., Comber, T.J.A.I.: Girls get it 2(3), 71–77 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Weinberg, J.B., et al.: The impact of robot projects on girls’ attitudes toward science and engineering. In: Workshop on Research in Robots for Education. Citeseer (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sullivan, A.A.J.T.U.: Breaking the STEM Stereotype: Investigating the Use of Robotics to Change Young Childrens Gender Stereotypes About Technology and Engineering (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Terry, B.S., Briggs, B.N., Rivale, S.: Work in progress: gender impacts of relevant robotics curricula on high school students' engineering attitudes and interest. In: 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sklar, E., Eguchi, A.: RoboCupJunior — four years later. In: Nardi, D., Riedmiller, M., Sammut, C., Santos-Victor, J. (eds.) RoboCup. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3276, pp. 172–183. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32256-6_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Pedersen, B.K.M.K., Marchetti, E., Valente, A., Nielsen, J.: Fabric robotics - lessons learned introducing soft robotics in a computational thinking course for children. In: Zaphiris, P., Ioannou, A. (eds.) HCII 2020. LNCS, vol. 12206, pp. 499–519. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50506-6_34

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Borum, N., Kristensen, K., Peterssonbrooks, E., Brooks, A.L.: Medium for children’s creativity: a case study of artifact’s influence. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M. (eds.) UAHCI 2014. LNCS, vol. 8514, pp. 233–244. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07440-5_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Carmichael, G.J.A.S.B.: Girls, computer science, and games 40(4), 107–110 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Papert, S.A.: Mindstorms: children, computers, and powerful ideas. 2020: Basic books (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  25. MakeCode, M.: MakeCode. https://makecode.microbit.org/. Accessed 14 Dec 2020

  26. Holst, K.: Ny bevilling giver ultra:bit vokseværk (2020). https://www.dr.dk/om-dr/ultrabit/ny-bevilling-giver-ultrabit-voksevaerk. Accessed 14 Dec 2020

  27. Teknologihuset. FireFly (2021). https://teknologihuset.dk/vare/firefly/. Accessed 20 Jan 2021

  28. Conde, M.Á., et al.: RoboSTEAM-A Challenge Based Learning Approach for integrating STEAM and develop Computational Thinking. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Johnson, L.F., et al.: Challenge-based learning: An approach for our time. The new Media consortium (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  30. IBM. SPSS (2021). https://www.ibm.com/analytics/spss-statistics-software. Accessed 4 Jan 2021

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bjarke Kristian Maigaard Kjær Pedersen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pedersen, B.K.M.K., Larsen, J.C., Nielsen, J. (2022). Girls and Technology – Insights from a Girls-Only Team at a Reengineered Educational Robotics Summer Camp. In: Merdan, M., Lepuschitz, W., Koppensteiner, G., Balogh, R., Obdržálek, D. (eds) Robotics in Education. RiE 2021. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1359. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82544-7_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics