Skip to main content

Management of Enterprise-Wide Information Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Engineering the Transformation of the Enterprise

Abstract

This article offers a short retrospective on the research streams about enterprise-wide IS management at the chair of Robert Winter. Both research project streams on analytical integration (data warehousing, information integration etc.) and transactional integration (application integration, enterprise architecture, transformation management) reside in the same understanding of the extended application landscape developed by Robert Winter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Winter, R.: Modelle, Techniken und Werkzeuge im Business Engineering. In: Österle, H., Winter, R. (eds.) Business Engineering – Auf dem Weg zum Unternehmen des Informationszeitalters, pp. 87–118. Springer, Berlin (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Winter, R.: Ein Modell zur Visualisierung der Anwendungslandschaft als Grundlage der Informationssystem-Architekturplanung. In: Schelp, J., Winter, R. (eds.) Integrationsmanagement, pp. 1–29. Springer, Berlin (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Winter, R. (ed.): Management von Integrationsprojekten, mit Grundlagenbeiträgen von Stephan Aier, Christian Fischer, Bettina Gleichauf, Christian Riege, Jan Saat, Joachim Schelp und Robert Winter. Business Engineering. Springer, Berlin (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gericke, A., Winter, R.: Geschäftslösungen – Gegenstand der Analyse und Gestaltung mit BEN. In: Winter, R. (ed.) Business Engineering Navigator: Gestaltung und Analyse von Geschäftslösungen “Business-to-IT”, pp. 15–54. Springer, Berlin (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schilling, R.D., et al.: Revisiting the impact of information systems architecture complexity: a complex adaptive systems perspective. In: 38th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2017), Seoul, South Korea (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Beese, J., et al.: Drivers and effects of information systems architecture complexity: a mixed-methods study. In: 24th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Istanbul, Turkey (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Österle, H., Otto, B.: Consortium research. a method for researcher-practitioner collaboration in design-oriented IS research. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 2(2), 273–285 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Luhn, H.P.: A business intelligence system. IBM J. Res. Dev. 2(4), 314–319 (1958)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Dinter, B., Lahrmann, G., Winter, R.: Information logistics as a conceptual foundation for enterprise-wide decision support. J. Decis. Syst. 19(2), 175–200 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Marjanovic, O., Dinter, B.: Learning from the history of business intelligence and analytics research at HICSS: a semantic text-mining approach. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 43 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jung, R., Winter, R. (eds.): Data Warehousing Strategie - Erfahrungen, Methoden, Visionen. Springer, Berlin (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Meyer, M., Winter, R.: Organisation des unternehmensweiten Data Warehousing. In: Jung, R., Winter, R. (eds.) Data Warehousing 2000 – Methoden, Anwendungen, Strategien, pp. 309–331. Physica, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Winter, R., Meyer, M.: Organization of data warehousing in large service companies – a matrix approach based on data ownership and competence centers. J. Data Warehousing. 6(4), 23–29 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Strauch, B.: Entwicklung einer Methode für die Informationsbedarfsanalyse im Data Warehousing. Universität St, Gallen, Bamberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Winter, R.: The Current and Future Role of Data Warehousing in Corporate Application Architecture. IEEE Computer Society (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Helfert, M.: Planung und Messung der Datenqualität in Data-Warehouse-Systemen. Difo-Druck GmbH, Bamberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. von Maur, E., Winter, R. (eds.): Data Warehouse Management. Business Engineering. Springer, Berlin (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Melchert, F., et al.: Using Reference Models for Data Warehouse Metadata Management. In: AMCIS2005, Omaha, NE (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Winter, R., Klesse, M.: Organizing data warehouse service providers. Bus. Intell. J. 14(3), 31–39 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Klesse, M.: Leistungsverrechnung im Data Warehousing – Entwicklung einer Methode. Universität St. Gallen, St. Gallen (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Melchert, F., Winter, R., Klesse, M.: Aligning process automation and business intelligence to support corporate performance management. In: AMCIS 2004. Association for Information Systems, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dinter, B., Winter, R. (eds.): Integrierte Informationslogistik. Business Engineering. Springer, Berlin (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dinter, B., et al.: Governance in der Informationslogistik am Beispiel eines Energieversorgers. In: DW2008: Synergien durch Integration und Informationslogistik. St.Gallen, Köllen (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Bucher, T., Dinter, B.: Situational method engineering to support process-oriented information logistics: identification of development situations. J. Database Manag. 23(1), 31–48 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bucher, T., Dinter, B.: Process orientation of information logistics – an empirical analysis to assess benefits, design factors, and realization approaches. In: The Forty-First Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-41). IEEE Computer Society, Waikoloa, Big Island, Hawaii (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dinter, B., Winter, R.: Information logistics strategy – analysis of current practices and proposal of a framework. In: 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-42). IEEE Computer Society, Big Island, Hawaii (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dinter, B.: Success factors for information logistics strategy — an empirical investigation. Decis. Support. Syst. 54(3), 1207–1218 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Raber, D., Wortmann, F., Winter, R.: Towards the measurement of business intelligence maturity. In: European Conference on Information Systems 2013, Utrecht (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lahrmann, G., et al.: Business intelligence maturity: development and evaluation of a theoretical model. In: Forty-Fourth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-44). IEEE Computer Society, Koloa, Kaua’i, Hawaii (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bischoff, S., et al.: Understanding continuous use of business intelligence systems: a mixed methods investigation. J. Inf. Technol. Theory Application. 16(2), 5–38, Article 2 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Epple, J., Bischoff, S., Aier, S.: Management objectives and design principles for the cost allocation of business intelligence. In: Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS 2015). Association for Information Systems, Singapore (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Epple, J., et al.: Business intelligence is no ‘free lunch’: what we already know about cost allocation – and what we should find out. Int. J. Bus. Intell. Res. 9(1), 1–15, Article 1 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Schilling, R.D., et al.: Design dimensions for enterprise-wide data management: a Chief Data Officer’s journey. In: Proc. 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 53), Grand Weilea, Maui, Hawaii (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Schelp, J., Winter, R.: Language communities in enterprise architecture research. In: Diversity in Design Science – 4th Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technologies (DESRIST2009). ACM, Philadelphia, PA (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Inmon, W.H.: Building the Operational Data Store, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Luftman, J.N., Lewis, P.R., Oldach, S.H.: Transforming the enterprise: the alignment of business and information technology strategies. IBM Syst. J. 32(1), 198–221 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Schwinn, A., Schelp, J.: Data integration patterns. In: 6th International Conference on Business Information Systems BIS 2003. Department of Management Information Systems at The Poznan University of Economics, Colorado Springs (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Schwinn, A.: Entwicklung einer Methode zur Gestaltung von Integrationsarchitekturen für Informationssysteme. Difo-Druck, Bamberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Winter, R.: Architektur braucht Management. Wirtschaftsinformatik. 46(4), 317–319 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hafner, M.: Entwicklung einer Methode für das Management der Informationssystemarchitektur im Unternehmen. Universität St. Gallen Institut für Wirtschaftsinformatik Difo-Druck, Bamberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hagen, C., Schwinn, A.: Measured Integration - Metriken für die Integrationsarchitektur. In: Schelp, J., Winter, R. (eds.) Integrationsmanagement. Planung, Bewertung und Steuerung von Applikationslandschaften, pp. 268–292. Springer, Berlin (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Schwinn, A., Winter, R.: Success factors and performance indicators for enterprise application integration. In: AMCIS2005. Association for Information Systems, Omaha, NE (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Braun, C.: Modellierung der Unternehmensarchitektur: Weiterentwicklung einer bestehenden Methode und deren Abbildung in einem Meta-Modellierungswerkzeug. Universität St. Gallen, St. Gallen (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Aier, S., et al.: Business engineering navigator – a “Business to IT” approach to enterprise architecture management. In: Bernard, S., et al. (eds.) Coherency Management – Architecting the Enterprise for Alignment, Agility, and Assurance, pp. 77–98. Author House, Bloomington (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Aier, S., et al.: Empirische Validierung von Integrationstypen am Beispiel unternehmensübergreifender Integration. In: 9. Internationale Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik. Wien, Österreichische Computer Gesellschaft (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Klesse, M., Wortmann, F., Schelp, J.: Erfolgsfaktoren der Applikationsintegration. Wirtschaftsinformatik. 47(4), 259–267 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Schelp, J., Winter, R. (eds.): Auf dem Weg zur Integration Factory. Physica, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Aier, S., Saat, J.: Wertbeitrag serviceorientierter Architekturen – Ein Framework für Business Cases als Ergebnis einer empirischen Studie. HMD – Praxis Der Wirtschaftsinformatik. 45(273), 107–115 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Aier, S., et al.: Economic Justification of Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) – Research Study: Experiences and Guidelines on Building SOA Business Cases (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Schelp, J., Stutz, M., Winter, R.: SOA-Risiken und SOA-Governance. In: Starke, G., Tilkov, S. (eds.) SOA-Expertenwissen - Methoden, Konzepte und Praxis serviceorientierter Architekturen, pp. 661–668. dpunkt, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Schelp, J., Winter, R.: Agilität und SOA. In: Starke, G., Tilkov, S. (eds.) SOA-Expertenwissen - Methoden, Konzepte und Praxis serviceorientierter Architekturen, pp. 41–47. dpunkt, Heidelberg (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Schelp, J., Winter, R.: Business application design and enterprise service design: a comparison. Int. J. Service Sci. 1(3/4), 206–224 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Aier, S., Gleichauf, B.: Towards a sophisticated understanding of service design for enterprise architecture. In: 3rd Workshop on Trends in Enterprise Architecture Research (TEAR 2008) at the 6th International Conference on Service Oriented Computing (ICSOC 2008). Springer, Sydney (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Aier, S., Winter, R.: Virtual decoupling for IT/business alignment – conceptual foundations, architecture design and implementation example. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 1(2), 150–163 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Schelp, J., Winter, R.: Integration management for heterogeneous information systems. In: Desouza, K.C. (ed.) Agile Information Systems – Conceptualizations, Construction, and Management, pp. 134–149. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Winter, R., Fischer, R.: Essential layers, artifacts, and dependencies of enterprise architecture. In: EDOC Workshop on Trends in Enterprise Architecture Research (TEAR 2006) within The Tenth IEEE International EDOC Conference (EDOC 2006). IEEE Computer Society, Hong Kong (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Schelp, J., Stutz, M.: SOA Governance. HMD - Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik. 42(253), 66–73 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Winter, R., Schelp, J.: Dienst-Orientierung im Business Engineering. Hmd - Praxis Der Wirtschaftsinformatik. 42(241), 45–54 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Winter, R., Schelp, J.: Dienstorientierte Architekturgestaltung auf unterschiedlichen Abstraktionsebenen. In: Reussner, R., Hasselbring, W. (eds.) Handbuch der Software-Architektur, pp. 229–242. dpunkt, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Winter, R., Schelp, J.: Enterprise architecture governance: the need for a business-to-IT approach. In: The 23rd Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC2008), Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil, Mar 16–20, 2008. ACM Press, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Aier, S., Fischer, C., Winter, R.: Construction and evaluation of a meta-model for enterprise architecture design principles. In: The 10th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik WI 2011, Zurich, Switzerland (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Winter, R., Aier, S.: How are enterprise architecture design principles used? In: The Fifteenth IEEE International EDOC Conference Workshops, Trends in Enterprise Architecture Research (TEAR). IEEE, Helsinki (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  63. Aier, S., et al.: Towards a more integrated EA planning: linking transformation planning with evolutionary change. In: The 4th International Workshop on Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures (EMISA 2011). Gesellschaft für Informatik Köllen, Hamburg (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Gericke, A., Winter, R.: BEN-Gestaltungsmethodik für Geschäftslösungen. In: Winter, R. (ed.) Business Engineering Navigator: Gestaltung und Analyse von Geschäftslösungen “Business-to-IT”, pp. 55–84. Springer, Berlin (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  65. Aier, S., Gleichauf, B.: Towards a sophisticated understanding of service design for enterprise architecture. In: 3rd Workshop on Trends in Enterprise Architecture Research (TEAR 2008), Sydney (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  66. Schelp, J., Winter, R.: (Re-) Design for Agility – Components of an Incremental Method for Integration Architecture Evolution in Large Companies (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  67. Schelp, J., Winter, R.: Management der Unternehmensarchitektur. In: Reussner, R., Hasselbring, W. (eds.) Handbuch der Software-Architektur, pp. 249–266. dpunkt, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  68. Stutz, M., Aier, S.: SOA-Migration und Integration auf Basis von Services-Repositories. Hmd - Praxis Der Wirtschaftsinformatik. 42(257), 20–27 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Aier, S., Gleichauf, B., Winter, R.: Understanding enterprise architecture management design – an empirical analysis. In: The 10th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik (WI 2011), Zurich, Switzerland (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  70. Aier, S., Riege, C., Winter, R.: Classification of enterprise architecture scenarios – an exploratory analysis. Enterprise Modell. Inf. Syst. Architect. 3(1), 14–23 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  71. Riege, C., Aier, S.: A contingency approach to enterprise architecture method engineering (extended version). J. Enterprise Architect. 5(1), 36–48 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  72. Aier, S.: The role of organizational culture for grounding, management, guidance and effectiveness of enterprise architecture principles. Inf. Syst. E-Bus. Manag. 12(1), 43–70 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Weiss, S., Aier, S., Winter, R.: Institutionalization and the effectiveness of enterprise architecture management. In: 34th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2013), Milano, Italy (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  74. Haki, K., et al.: The evolution of information systems architecture: an agent-based simulation model. MIS Q. 44(1), 155–184 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Brosius, M., et al.: Enterprise architecture assimilation: an institutional perspective. In: Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2018), San Francisco, USA (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  76. Ross, J.W., Quaadgras, A.: Enterprise Architecture Is Not Just for Architects. Center for Information Systems Research Sloan School of Management Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  77. Winter, R.: Architectural thinking. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 6(6), 361–364 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Aier, S., Labusch, N., Pähler, P.: Implementing architectural thinking: a case study at Commerzbank AG. In: Proceedings of the CAiSE 2015 Workshops, Stockholm, Sweden (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  79. Burmester, F., Drews, P., Schirmer, I.: Leveraging architectural thinking for large-scale E-government projects. In: Fortieth International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2019), Munich (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  80. Horlach, B., et al.: Everyone’s going to be an architect: design principles for architectural thinking in agile organizations. In: Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Wailea (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  81. Schilling, R.D., Aier, S., Winter, R.: Designing an artifact for informal control in enterprise architecture management. In: Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2019), Munich, Germany (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  82. Blaschke, M., et al.: Capabilities for digital platform survival: insights from a business-to-business digital platform. In: 39th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS2018). Association for Information Systems, San Francisco, CA (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  83. Schmid, M., et al.: Developing design principles for digital platforms: an agent-based modeling approach. In: 15th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (DESRIST 2020). Springer Nature Switzerland AG, Kristiansand, Norway (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  84. Haki, M.K., Aier, S., Winter, R.: A stakeholder perspective to study enterprisewide IS initiatives. In: 24th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Istanbul, Turkey (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  85. Beese, J., et al.: Simulation-based research in information systems: epistemic implications and a review of the status quo. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 61(4), 503–521 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Spagnoletti, P., et al.: Exploring foundations for using simulations in IS research. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 42(1), 268–300 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  87. Beese, J., et al.: Enterprise architecture as a public goods dilemma: an experimental approach. In: Aveiro, D., Guizzardi, G., Borbinha, J. (eds.) Advances in Enterprise Engineering XIII, pp. 102–114. Springer, Cham (2020)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  88. Winter, R., Schelp, J.: Reference modeling and method construction – a design science perspective. In: 21st Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC2006), Dijon, France, April 23–27, 2006. ACM Press, Dijon, France (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  89. Aier, S., Fischer, C.: Scientific progress of design research artefacts. In: Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2009), Verona (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  90. Gericke, A., Winter, R.: Notwendigkeit und Priosisierung einer betriebswirtschaftlichen Konstruktionslehre. In: Winter, R. (ed.) Business Engineering Navigator: Gestaltung und Analyse von Geschäftslösungen “Business-to-IT”, pp. 1–13. Springer, Berlin (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  91. Schilling, R.D., et al.: Extending CCM4DSR for collaborative diagnosis of socio-technical problems. In: 12th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (DESRIST 2017). Springer, Karlsruhe, Germany (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  92. Schelp, J., Winter, R.: On the interplay of design research and behavioral research—a language community perspective. In: Third International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (DESRIST2008), Georgia State University (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  93. Aier, S., Johnson, P., Schelp, J.: TEAR 2008. Pre-Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Trends in Enterprise Architecture Research. In: The 3rd Workshop on Trends in Enterprise Architecture Research (TEAR 2008) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  94. Abraham, R., et al.: Understanding coordination support of enterprise architecture management – empirical analysis and implications for practice. In: Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), Chicago, IL (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  95. Labusch, N., et al.: Architectural support of enterprise transformations: insights from corporate practice. In: Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik 2014. Universität Paderborn, Paderborn (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  96. Labusch, N., et al.: The architects’ perspective on enterprise transformation: an explorative study. In: 6th Working Conference, PRET 2013. Springer, Utrecht (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  97. Proper, H.A., et al. (eds.): Architectural Coordination of Enterprise Transformation. The Enterprise Engineering Series. Springer, Cham (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  98. Abraham, R., et al.: Transformation intelligence capability catalogue. In: Proper, H.A., et al. (eds.) Architectural Coordination of Enterprise Transformation, pp. 175–181. Springer, Cham (2017)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  99. Lahrmann, G., et al.: Management of large-scale transformation programs: state of the practice and future potential. In: 7th Workshop, TEAR 2012, and 5th Working Conference, PRET 2012 at The Open Group Conference 2012. Springer, Barcelona (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  100. Labusch, N., Winter, R.: Method support of large-scale transformation in the insurance sector: exploring foundations. In: 7th Workshop, TEAR 2012, and 5th Working Conference, PRET 2012 at The Open Group Conference 2012. Springer, Barcelona (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  101. Abraham, R., Aier, S., Winter, R.: Crossing the line: overcoming knowledge boundaries in enterprise transformation. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 57(1), 3–13 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Abraham, R., et al.: Can boundary objects mitigate communication defects in enterprise transformation? Findings from expert interviews. In: 5th International Workshop on Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures (EMISA 2013). Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI), St. Gallen (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  103. Abraham, R., Tribolet, J., Winter, R.: Transformation of multi-level systems – theoretical grounding and consequences for enterprise architecture management. In: Advances in Enterprise Engineering VII, pp. 73–87 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  104. Labusch, N., Aier, S., Winter, R.: Beyond enterprise architecture modeling – what are the essentials to support enterprise transformations? In: 5th International Workshop on Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures (EMISA 2013). Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI), St. Gallen (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  105. Labusch, N.: The ACET information requirements reference model. In: Proper, H.A., et al. (eds.) Architectural Coordination of Enterprise Transformation, pp. 211–220. Springer, Cham (2017)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  106. Labusch, N.: Information requirements for enterprise transformation. In: Proper, H.A., et al. (eds.) Architectural Coordination of Enterprise Transformation, pp. 111–121. Springer, Cham (2017)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephan Aier .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Aier, S., Dinter, B., Schelp, J. (2021). Management of Enterprise-Wide Information Systems. In: Aier, S., Rohner, P., Schelp, J. (eds) Engineering the Transformation of the Enterprise. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84655-8_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84655-8_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-84654-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-84655-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics