Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Digital Resilience to Normal Accidents in High-Reliability Organizations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Engineering the Transformation of the Enterprise

  • 1326 Accesses

Abstract

Digital technologies play a dual role on organizational resilience. On one side, digital systems introduce new technological risks. On the other side, digital systems increase the performances in response to hazardous accidents. Normal Accident Theory (NAT) and High-Reliability Organization (HRO) provide useful ground to explain the dynamics of digital resilience. However, the two theories have been either used as alternatives or with one theory dominating the other. We posit that to fully understand digital resilience we need to integrate NAT and HRO concepts instead of using them in isolation. We conduct a bibliometric analysis to identify major themes and application domains characterizing HRO and NAT research. We look at similarities and differences between the two streams and we build an integrated framework for the analysis of digital resilience. With our systematic analysis of the NAT and HRO discourses we advance the current understanding on resilience in digitally enabled operations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Muzio, D., Doh, J.: COVID-19 and the future of management studies. Insights from leading scholars. J. Manag. Stud. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12689

  2. Burton-Jones, A.: What have we learned from the Smart Machine? Inf. Organ. 24(2), 71–105 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2014.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Surendra, N.C., Nazir, S.: Creating “informating” systems using Agile development practices: an action research study. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 28(5), 549–565 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2019.1620649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hanseth, O., Ciborra, C.: Risk, Complexity and ICT. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Rai, A.: Editor’s Comments: The COVID-19 pandemic: building resilience with IS research. MIS Q. 44(2), iii–vii (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Williams, T.A., Gruber, D.A., Sutcliffe, K.M., Shepherd, D.A., Zhao, E.Y.: Organizational response to adversity: fusing crisis management and resilience research streams. Acad. Manag. Ann. 11(2), 733–769 (2017). https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Weick, K.E., Roberts, K.H.: Collective mind in organizations: heedful interrelating on flight decks. Adm. Sci. Q. 38(3), 357–381 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rijpma, J.A.: From deadlock to dead end: the normal accidents-high reliability debate revisited. J. Conting. Crisis Manag. 11(1), 37–45 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.1101007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Leveson, N., Dulac, N., Marais, K., Carroll, J.: Moving beyond normal accidents and high reliability organizations: a systems approach to safety in complex systems. Organ. Stud. 30(2–3), 227–249 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840608101478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Salovaara, A., Lyytinen, K., Penttinen, E.: High reliability in digital organizing: Mindlessness, the frame problem, and digital operations. MIS Q. Manag. Inf. Syst. 43(2), 555–578 (2019). https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2019/14577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Linnenluecke, M.K.: Resilience in business and management research: a review of influential publications and a research agenda. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 19(1), 4–30 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Za, S., Spagnoletti, P., Winter, R., Mettler, T.: Exploring foundations for using simulations in IS research. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 42(1), 268–300 (2018). https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Noori, N.S., Wolbers, J., Boersma, K., Cardona, X.V.: A dynamic perspective of emerging coordination clusters in crisis response networks. In: Proceedings of the International ISCRAM Conference (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wolbers, J., Boersma, K., Groenewegen, P.: Introducing a fragmentation perspective on coordination in crisis management. Organ. Stud. 39(11), 1521–1546 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840617717095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Spagnoletti, P., Resca, A., Lee, G.: A design theory for digital platforms supporting online communities: a multiple case study. J. Inf. Technol. (Palgrave Macmillan). 30(4), 364–380 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2014.37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rubbio, I., Bruccoleri, M., Pietrosi, A., Ragonese, B.: Digital health technology enhances resilient behaviour: evidence from the ward. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 39(2), 260–293 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-02-2018-0057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Roth, E.M., Multer, J., Raslear, T.: Shared situation awareness as a contributor to high reliability performance in railroad operations. Organ. Stud. 27(7), 967–987 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606065705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. O’Dwyer, E., Pan, I., Charlesworth, R., Butler, S., Shah, N.: Integration of an energy management tool and digital twin for coordination and control of multi-vector smart energy systems. Sustain. Cities Soc. 62(July), 102412 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Scholz, R.W., Czichos, R., Parycek, P., Lampoltshammer, T.J.: Organizational vulnerability of digital threats: a first validation of an assessment method. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 282(2), 627–643 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.09.020

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Zamora, D., Barahona, J.C., Palaco, I.: Case: Digital Governance Office. J. Bus. Res. 69(10), 4484–4488 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gajek, S., Lees, M., Jansen, C.: IIoT and cyber-resilience: could blockchain have thwarted the Stuxnet attack? AI Society. (0123456789) (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01023-w

  22. Parri, J., Patara, F., Sampietro, S., Vicario, E.: A framework for Model-Driven Engineering of resilient software-controlled systems. Computing. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-020-00841-6

  23. Baskerville, R., Spagnoletti, P., Kim, J.: Incident-centered information security: managing a strategic balance between prevention and response. Inf. Manag. 51(1) (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2013.11.004

  24. Castriotta, M., Loi, M., Marku, E., Naitana, L.: What’s in a name? Exploring the conceptual structure of emerging organizations. Scientometrics. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2977-2

  25. Scornavacca, E., Paolone, F., Za, S., Martiniello, L.: Investigating the entrepreneurial perspective in smart city studies. Int. Entrepreneur. Manag. J. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-019-00630-4

  26. Cram, W.A., Templier, M., Paré, G.: (Re)considering the concept of literature review reproducibility. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 21(5), 1103–1114 (2020). https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zupic, I., Čater, T.: Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organ. Res. Methods. 18(3), 429–472 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cobo, M.J., López-Herrera, A.G., Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F.: An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: a practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field. J. Inform. 5(1), 146–166 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Za, S., Pallud, J., Agrifoglio, R., Metallo, C.: Value co-creation in online communities: a preliminary literature analysis. In: Exploring Digital Ecosystems, LNISO, vol. 33, pp. 33–46. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23665-6_4

  30. Callon, M., Courtial, J.-P., Turner, W.A., Bauin, S.: From translations to problematic networks: an introduction to co-word analysis. Soc. Sci. Inf. 22(2), 191–235 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1177/053901883022002003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cambrosio, A., Limoges, C., Courtial, J.P., Laville, F.: Historical scientometrics? Mapping over 70 years of biological safety research with coword analysis. Scientometrics. 27(2), 119–143 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lamboglia, R., Lavorato, D., Scornavacca, E., Za, S.: Exploring the relationship between audit and technology. A bibliometric analysis. Meditari Account. Res. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-03-2020-0836

  33. Za, S., Braccini, A.M.: Tracing the roots of the organizational benefits of IT services. In: Za, S., Drăgoicea, M., Cavallari M. (eds.) LNBIP – Exploring Services Science, pp. 3–11. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56925-3_1

  34. Aria, M., Cuccurullo, C.: Bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J. Inform. 11(4), 959–975 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Cuccurullo, C., Aria, M., Sarto, F.: Foundations and trends in performance management. A twenty-five years bibliometric analysis in business and public administration domains. Scientometrics. 108(2), 595–611 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1948-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Beese, J., Haki, M.K., Aier, S., Winter, R.: Simulation-based research in information systems: epistemic implications and a review of the status quo. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 61(4), 503–521 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-018-0529-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Heeks, R., Ospina, A.V.: Conceptualising the link between information systems and resilience: a developing country field study. Inf. Syst. J. 29(1), 70–96 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Constantinides, P.: The failure of foresight in crisis management: a secondary analysis of the mari disaster. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 80(9), 1657–1673 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.10.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Fraher, A.L., Branicki, L.J., Grint, K.: Mindfulness in action: discovering how U.S. Navy seals build capacity for mindfulness in high-reliability organizations (HROs). Acad. Manag. Discov. 3(3), 239–261 (2017). https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2014.0146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Spagnoletti, P., Salvi, A.: Digital systems in High-Reliability Organizations: balancing mindfulness and mindlessness. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Socio-Technical Perspective in IS Development (STPIS 2020), June 8–9, 2020. CEUR Workshop Proceedings (CEUR-WS.org) (2020)

  41. Spagnoletti, P., Salvi, A.: Digitalization in mission command and control: fragmenting coordination in military operations. In: Lucarelli, S., Marrone, A., Moro, F.N. (eds.) NATO Decision-Making in the Age of Big Data and Artificial Intelligence, pp. 28–37. (2021)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Luiss University, Rome, Italy

    Paolo Spagnoletti

  2. University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway

    Paolo Spagnoletti

  3. G. D’Annunzio University, Pescara, Italy

    Stefano Za

Authors
  1. Paolo Spagnoletti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stefano Za
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paolo Spagnoletti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universität St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland

    Stephan Aier

  2. Universität St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland

    Peter Rohner

  3. Universität St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland

    Joachim Schelp

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Spagnoletti, P., Za, S. (2021). Digital Resilience to Normal Accidents in High-Reliability Organizations. In: Aier, S., Rohner, P., Schelp, J. (eds) Engineering the Transformation of the Enterprise. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84655-8_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84655-8_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-84654-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-84655-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation