Abstract
In this position paper, we discuss the introduction of spatial verification techniques in an application scenario from smart stations, viz. analysing the user experience with respect to the lighting conditions of station areas. This is a case study in industrial projects. We discuss three challenging use cases for the application of spatial model checking in this setting. First, we envision how to use the spatial model checker VoxLogicA, which can analyse both 2D and 3D voxel-based maps, to explore the areas that users can visit in a station area and to characterise them with respect to their illumination conditions. This is aimed at monitoring a smart station. We also ideate statistical spatio-temporal model checking of the design of energy-saving protocols, exploiting the modelling of user preferences. Finally, we discuss the idea of quantifying the impact of design changes, based on the logs of smart stations, to identify and measure the incidence of undesired events (e.g. non-illuminated platforms where a train is passing by) before and after each change.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Banci Buonamici, F., Belmonte, G., Ciancia, V., Latella, D., Massink, M.: Spatial logics and model checking for medical imaging. Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf. 22(2), 195–217 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10009-019-00511-9
Banks, A., Gupta, R.: MQTT version 3.1.1. OASIS standard, October 2014. http://docs.oasis-open.org/mqtt/mqtt/v3.1.1/os/mqtt-v3.1.1-os.html
Basile, D., ter Beek, M.H., Di Giandomenico, F., Fantechi, A., Gnesi, S., Spagnolo, G.O.: 30 years of simulation-based quantitative analysis tools: A comparison experiment between Möbius and Uppaal SMC. In: ISoLA. LNCS, vol. 12476, pp. 368–384. Springer (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61362-4_21
ter Beek, M.H., Gnesi, S., Knapp, A.: Formal methods for transport systems. Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf. 20(3), 355–358 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10009-018-0487-4
Belmonte, G., Broccia, G., Vincenzo, C., Latella, D., Massink, M.: Feasibility of spatial model checking for nevus segmentation. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Formal Methods in Software Engineering (FormalieSE 2021), pp. 1–12. IEEE (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/FormaliSE52586.2021.00007
Belmonte, G., Ciancia, V., Latella, D., Massink, M.: Voxlogica: A spatial model checker for declarative image analysis. In: Vojnar, T., Zhang, L. (eds.) TACAS. LNCS, vol. 11427, pp. 281–298. Springer (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17462-0_16
Bezhanishvili, N., Ciancia, V., Gabelaia, D., Grilletti, G., Latella, D., Massink, M.: Geometric model checking of continuous space. http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.06194 [cs.LO], May 2021
Broccia, G., Milazzo, P., Ölveczky, P.C.: Formal modeling and analysis of safety-critical human multitasking. Innov. Syst. Softw. Eng. 15(3–4), 169–190 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11334-019-00333-7
Bussi, L., Ciancia, V., Gadducci, F.: Towards a spatial model checker on GPU. In: Peters, K., Willemse, T. (eds.) FORTE. LNCS, vol. 12719, pp. 188–196. Springer (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78089-0_12
Ciancia, V., Gilmore, S., Grilletti, G., Latella, D., Loreti, M., Massink, M.: Spatio-temporal model checking of vehicular movement in public transport systems. Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf. 20(3) (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10009-018-0483-8
Ciancia, V., Grilletti, G., Latella, D., Loreti, M., Massink, M.: An experimental spatio-temporal model checker. In: Bianculli, D., Calinescu, R., Rumpe, B. (eds.) SEFM. LNCS, vol. 9509, pp. 297–311. Springer (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49224-6_24
Ciancia, V., Latella, D., Loreti, M., Massink, M.: Model checking spatial logics for closure spaces. Log. Methods Comput. Sci. 12(4) (2016). https://doi.org/10.2168/LMCS-12(4:2)2016
Ciancia, V., Latella, D., Loreti, M., Massink, M.: Specifying and verifying properties of space. In: Diaz, J., Lanese, I., Sangiorgi, D. (eds.) TCS. LNCS, vol. 8705, pp. 222–235. Springer (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44602-7_18
Ciancia, V., Latella, D., Massink, M., Paškauskas, R.: Exploring spatio-temporal properties of bike-sharing systems. In: Workshops Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems (SASO 2015), pp. 74–79. IEEE (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/SASOW.2015.17
Ciancia, V., Latella, D., Massink, M., Paškauskas, R., Vandin, A.: A tool-chain for statistical spatio-temporal model checking of bike sharing systems. In: Margaria, T., Steffen, B. (eds.) ISoLA. LNCS, vol. 9952, pp. 657–673. Springer (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47166-2_46
Di Giandomenico, F., Gnesi, S., Spagnolo, G.O., Fantechi, A.: Smart services for railways. ERCIM News 117, 34–35 (2019)
Fielding, R.T.: Architectural styles and the design of network-based software architectures. Ph.D. thesis, University of California (2000). https://www.ics.uci.edu/~fielding/pubs/dissertation/top.htm
Gilmore, S., Reijsbergen, D., Vandin, A.: Transient and steady-state statistical analysis for discrete event simulators. In: Polikarpova, N., Schneider, S.A. (eds.) IFM. LNCS, vol. 10510, pp. 145–160. Springer (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66845-1_10
Hänseler, F.S., van den Heuvel, J.P., Cats, O., Daamen, W., Hoogendoorn, S.P.: A passenger-pedestrian model to assess platform and train usage from automated data. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 132, 948–968 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.12.032
Lai, X., Dai, M., Rameezdeen, R.: Energy saving based lighting system optimization and smart control solutions for rail transportation: evidence from China. Results Eng. 5, 100096 (2020)
Massink, M., Paškauskas, R.: Model-based assessment of aspects of user-satisfaction in bicycle sharing systems. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2015), pp. 1363–1370. IEEE (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2015.224
Sebastio, S., Vandin, A.: MultiVeStA: statistical model checking for discrete event simulators. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Performance Evaluation Methodologies and Tools (ValueTools 2013), pp. 310–315. ACM (2013). https://doi.org/10.4108/icst.valuetools.2013.254377
STINGRAY report: Algoritmi Innovativi. Deliverable D2.3.1, December 2020
Vandin, A., Giachini, D., Lamperti, F., Chiaromonte, F.: Automated and distributed statistical analysis of economic agent-based models. http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.05405 [econ.GN], February 2021
Acknowledgments
Supported by the POR FESR 2014–2020 projects STINGRAY (SmarT station INtelliGent RAilwaY) and SmaRIERS (Smart Railway Infrastructures: Efficiency, Reliability and Safety), and by the MIUR PRIN 2017FTXR7S project IT MaTTerS (Methods and Tools for Trustworthy Smart Systems).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
ter Beek, M.H., Ciancia, V., Latella, D., Massink, M., Spagnolo, G.O. (2021). Spatial Model Checking for Smart Stations. In: Lluch Lafuente, A., Mavridou, A. (eds) Formal Methods for Industrial Critical Systems. FMICS 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12863. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85248-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85248-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-85247-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-85248-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)