Skip to main content

Exercise Perceptions: Experience Report from a Secure Software Development Course

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Quality of Information and Communications Technology (QUATIC 2021)

Abstract

The ubiquitous use of software in critical systems necessitates integrating cybersecurity concepts into the software engineering curriculum so that students studying software engineering have adequate knowledge to securely develop software projects, which could potentially secure critical systems. An experience report of developing and conducting a course can help educators to gain an understanding of student preferences on topics related to secure software development. We provide an experience report related to the ‘Secure Software Development’ course conducted at Tennessee Technological University. We discuss student motivations, as well as positive and negative perceptions of students towards exercises. Based on our findings, we recommend educators to integrate real-world exercises into a secure software development course with careful consideration of tool documentation, balance in exercise diversity, and student background.

Partially funded by the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) award # 2026869. Special thanks to the PASER group at TnTU for their feedback.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://jia.sipa.columbia.edu/fourth-industrial-revolution-shaping-new-era.

  2. 2.

    https://threatpost.com/food-supply-americold-cyberattack/161402/.

  3. 3.

    https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Customizing-Git-Git-Hooks.

  4. 4.

    http://cppcheck.sourceforge.net/.

  5. 5.

    https://www.saltstack.com/.

  6. 6.

    https://bandit.readthedocs.io/en/latest/.

  7. 7.

    https://modelzoo.co/.

  8. 8.

    https://docs.python.org/3/library/ast.html.

References

  1. Ammann, P., Offutt, J.: Introduction to Software Testing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2016)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Anonymous: Materials for the Secure Software Development Course, December 2020. https://figshare.com/s/f40c6df28ab2a2b55165

  3. Beach, S.K.: Usable cybersecurity: human factors in cybersecurity education curricula. Nat. Cybersecur. Inst. J. 1(1), 5–15 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bures, T., et al.: Software engineering for smart cyber-physical systems: challenges and promising solutions. ACM SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 42(2), 19–24 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chuvakin, A., Peterson, G.: How to do application logging right. IEEE Secur. Priv. 8(4), 82–85 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2010.127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen, J.: A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ. Psychol. Measur. 20(1), 37–46 (1960). https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Firesmith, D., et al.: Engineering security requirements. J. Object Technol. 2(1), 53–68 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gupta, M.K., Govil, M.C., Singh, G.: Static analysis approaches to detect SQL injection and cross site scripting vulnerabilities in web applications: a survey. In: International Conference on Recent Advances and Innovations in Engineering (ICRAIE-2014), pp. 1–5 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRAIE.2014.6909173

  9. King, J., Pandita, R., Williams, L.: Enabling forensics by proposing heuristics to identify mandatory log events. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Symposium and Bootcamp on the Science of Security, HotSoS 2015, Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2746194.2746200

  10. Kumar, R.S.S., et al.: Adversarial machine learning-industry perspectives. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.05646 (2020)

  11. Lukowiak, M., Radziszowski, S., Vallino, J., Wood, C.: Cybersecurity education: bridging the gap between hardware and software domains. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 14(1), 1–20 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2538029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mountrouidou, X., Li, X., Burke, Q.: Cybersecurity in liberal arts general education curriculum. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE 2018, pp. 182–187. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3197091.3197110

  13. NIETP: NIETP About CAE Program (2020). https://www.iad.gov/nietp/CAERequirements.cfm. Accessed 18 Dec 2020

  14. Olano, M., et al.: SecurityEmpire: development and evaluation of a digital game to promote cybersecurity education. In: 2014 USENIX Summit on Gaming, Games, and Gamification in Security Education (3GSE 14). USENIX Association, San Diego, August 2014. https://www.usenix.org/conference/3gse14/summit-program/presentation/olano

  15. Onik, M.M.H., Kim, C.S., Lee, N.Y., Yang, J.: Personal information classification on aggregated android application’s permissions. Appl. Sci. 9(19), 3997 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rahman, A., Rahman, M.R., Parnin, C., Williams, L.: Security smells in ansible and chef scripts: a replication study. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 30(1), 1–31 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3408897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Saldana, J.: The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Sage (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Theisen, C., Williams, L., Oliver, K., Murphy-Hill, E.: Software security education at scale. In: Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Software Engineering Companion, pp. 346–355 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Veneruso, S.V., Ferro, L.S., Marrella, A., Mecella, M., Catarci, T.: CyberVR: an interactive learning experience in virtual reality for cybersecurity related issues. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, AVI 2020, Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3399715.3399860

  20. Wood, C., Raj, R.: Keyloggers in cybersecurity education. In: Security and Management, pp. 293–299. Citeseer (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akond Rahman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rahman, A., Hossain, S., Bose, D.B. (2021). Exercise Perceptions: Experience Report from a Secure Software Development Course. In: Paiva, A.C.R., Cavalli, A.R., Ventura Martins, P., Pérez-Castillo, R. (eds) Quality of Information and Communications Technology. QUATIC 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1439. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85347-1_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85347-1_37

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-85346-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-85347-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics