Skip to main content

The Fall and Rise of Resemblance Diagrams

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Diagrammatic Representation and Inference (Diagrams 2021)

Abstract

A recent investigation of the changes in the use of diagrams in published mathematics papers shows that diagrams were frequently used at the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th. They then largely disappeared in the period 1910–1950, whereafter they reappear [1]. Although this story is unsurprising considering the dominance of formalist ideology in the first half of the 20th century, the detailed investigation of the development points out several interesting open questions. Especially, we do not know if the diagrams that disappeared with the advent of formalism are the same as those that are used today.

In this paper, we will focus on so-called “resemblance” diagrams, which are one of three general categories of diagrams covered in the investigation in [1]. We will analyze and compare resemblance diagrams used in the late 19th century with those used in the early 20th century to determine if there have been substantial changes. The comparison shows that even though the diagrams can be said to belong to the same general category and share certain general features, the resemblance diagrams used today are very different from those used before the advent of formalism. The criticism raised by the formalist movement of the diagrams used in the late 19th century can be seen as a possible explanation of this change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Johansen, M.W., Pallavicini, J.L.: Entering the valley of formalism. Trends and changes in mathematicians’ publication practice 1885 to 2015 [In review]

    Google Scholar 

  2. Johansen, M.W., Misfeldt, M., Pallavicini, J.L.: A typology of mathematical diagrams. In: Chapman, P., Stapleton, G., Moktefi, A., Perez-Kriz, S., Bellucci, F. (eds.) Diagrams 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10871, pp. 105–119. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91376-6_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Michael, H., Ulrich, M. (eds.) David Hilbert’s Lectures on the Foundations of Geometry 1891–1902. Springer, Berlin (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pasch, M., Dehn, M.: Vorlesungen über neuere Geometrie. Die Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol. 23. Springer, Berlin (1882/1926)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Russell, B.: Mathematics and the metaphysicians. bertrand russel: mysticism and logic and other essays, London: George Allen and Unwin 1917, pp. 74–96. (First published as “Recent Work on the Principles of Mathematics”). In: International Monthly, vol. 4, pp. 83–101 (1917/[1901])

    Google Scholar 

  6. Candy, A.L.: A general theorem relating to transversals, and its consequences. Ann. Math. 11(1/6), 175–190 (1895)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Sylvester, J.: On a funicular solution of Buffon’s “problem of the needle” in its most general form. Acta Mathematica 14, 185–205 (1890)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Emch, A.: On the fundamental property of the linear group of transformation in the plane. Ann. Math. 10(1/6), 3–4 (1895)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Colding, T.H., Minicozzi II, W.P., Pedersen, E.K.: Mean curvature flow. Bull. (new Series) Am. Math. Soc. 52(2), 297–333 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Morgan, J.W.: Recent progress on the Poincaré conjecture and the classification of 3-manifolds. Bull. (new Series) Am. Math. Soc. 42(1), 57–78 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. De Toffoli, S.: Chasing the diagram–the use of visualizations in algebraic reasoning. Rev. Symb. Logic 10(1), 158–186 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lackenby, M.: A polynomial upper bound on Reidemeister moves. Ann. Math. 182(2), 491–564 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Buch, A.S.: Mutations of puzzles and equivariant cohomology of two-step flag varieties. Ann. Math. 182(1), 173–220 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Giaquinto, M.: The epistemology of visual thinking in mathematics. In: Edward, N.Z. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2020 Edition) (2020). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/epistemology-visual-thinking/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mikkel Willum Johansen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Johansen, M.W., Pallavicini, J.L. (2021). The Fall and Rise of Resemblance Diagrams. In: Basu, A., Stapleton, G., Linker, S., Legg, C., Manalo, E., Viana, P. (eds) Diagrammatic Representation and Inference. Diagrams 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12909. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86062-2_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86062-2_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86061-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86062-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics