Skip to main content

Diagrammatic Representations of Uncertainty in Meteorological Forecasting

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Diagrammatic Representation and Inference (Diagrams 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 12909))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1133 Accesses

Abstract

Meteorological prediction is complex, but an important scientific practice to help keep people safe. In the past few decades, forecasts have become much more accurate. However, this accuracy has not removed uncertainty from forecasts. Indeed, it is widely acknowledged that weather forecasting is an inherently uncertain practice. Given that the aims of weather prediction are practical (to help keep people and property safe), it is important that weather forecasts be effectively communicated to the broader public. But, there is an interesting question here about how the uncertainty (itself an interesting epistemological concept) of the forecasts is communicated. One of the ways this is done by the National Weather Service in the United States is to use various forms of graphical and diagrammatic representations to identify and communicate the uncertainty that remains as part of a forecast. In this essay, I will explore some of these diagrammatic and graphical representations to identify the ways in which uncertainty is expressed. I argue that there is an interesting and important way in which the aims of meteorological practice constrain the representations—such that they do not aim at perfect (or true) representations, but rather at products which will help change behavior to save lives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    All tweets come from the social media account of the NWS in Omaha (@NWSOmaha).

References

  1. “About the NWS”: 2021. 2021. https://www.weather.gov/about/

  2. Alley, R.B., Emanuel, K.A., Zhang, F.: Advances in weather prediction. Science 363(6425), 342–344 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav7274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brennan, M.: Tropical cyclone track: overview, challenges, and forecast philosophy. In: In: Presented at the national hurricane conference, national hurricane center, April 20 (2017). https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/outreach/presentations/NHC2017_TrackForecasting.pdf

  4. Herman, G.R., Nielsen, E.R., Schumacher, R.S.: Probabilistic verification of storm prediction center convective outlooks. Weather Forecast. 33(1), 161–184 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-17-0104.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hitchens, N.M., Brooks, H.E.: Evaluation of the storm prediction center’s day 1 convective outlooks. Weather and Forecasting 27(6), 1580–1585 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hitchens, N.M., Brooks, H.E.: Evaluation of the storm prediction center’s convective outlooks from day 3 through day 1. Weather and Forecasting 29(5), 1134–1142 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lazo, J.K., Lawson, M., Larsen, P.H., Waldman, D.M.: US economic sensitivity to weather variability. Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc. 92(6), 709–720 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lorenz, E.N.: A study of the predictability of a 28-variable atmospheric model. Tellus 17(3), 321–333 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lorenz, E.N.: The predictability of a flow which possesses many scales of motion. Tellus 21(3), 289–307 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1969.tb00444.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. National Safety Council: n.d. Weather-Related Deaths and Injuries. Injury Facts (blog). https://injuryfacts.nsc.org/home-and-community/safety-topics/weather-related-deaths-and-injuries/. Accessed 26 June 2020

  11. Parker, W.S.: Predicting weather and climate: uncertainty, ensembles and probability. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 41(3), 263–272 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Parker, W.S.: Whose probabilities? Predicting climate change with ensembles of models. Philosophy of Science 77(5), 985–997 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Parker, W.S.: Ensemble modeling, uncertainty and robust predictions. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 4(3), 213–223 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Parker, W.S.: Simulation and understanding in the study of weather and climate. Perspect. Sci. 22(3), 336–356 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Uccellini, L.W., Ten Hoeve, J.E.: Evolving the national weather service to build a weather-ready nation: connecting observations, forecasts, and warnings to decision-makers through impact-based decision support services. Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc. 100(10), 1923–1942 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0159.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. US Department of Commerce, NOAA. n.d. “We Are the National Weather Service.” Accessed July 2, 2020. https://www.weather.gov/about/nws.

  17. Weisberg, M.: Three Kinds of Idealization. J. Philos. 104(12), 639–659 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang, F., et al.: What is the predictability limit of midlatitude weather? J. Atmospheric Sci. 76(4), 1077–1091 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang, F., Weng, Y.: Predicting hurricane intensity and associated hazards: a five-year real-time forecast experiment with assimilation of airborne doppler radar observations. Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc. 96(1), 25–33 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00231.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brandon Boesch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Boesch, B. (2021). Diagrammatic Representations of Uncertainty in Meteorological Forecasting. In: Basu, A., Stapleton, G., Linker, S., Legg, C., Manalo, E., Viana, P. (eds) Diagrammatic Representation and Inference. Diagrams 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12909. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86062-2_48

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86062-2_48

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86061-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86062-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics