Abstract
Programming is not a simple task. Besides, the learning of syntax, the obstacles often seem insurmountable for the beginner. Syntax errors frustrate and distract attention from the actual algorithms and logic that need to be understood. With the help of visual programming, syntax errors can be avoided as much as possible by using predefined graphical boxes, which, due to their shape, can only be connected correctly to form a program. Moreover, Smart Contracts are mainly designed to exclude the need to trust a third party. Here using Visual programming makes perfect sense by making the creation of Smart Contracts much simpler without the help of a developer. Another advantage of Visual Programming Language (VPL) in Smart Contract creation is that the terms and conditions in Contracts can be read and understood from non-developers. In this research we aim to implement a Visual Smart Contract Creator and to conduct an empirical evaluation, which on the one hand, measures the semantic understandability of a visual representation of a Smart Contract created with our tool and compares it to its textual representation in Ride programming language. On the other hand, we evaluate the user acceptance of the tool.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nakamoto, S.: Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system (2008). https://Bitcoin.org/Bitcoin.pdf
Wright, A., De Filippi, P.: Decentralized Blockchain technology and the rise of lex cryptographia (2015)
Swan, M.: Blockchain: Blueprint for a New Economy. O’Reilly Media, Inc. (2015)
Luu, L., Teutsch, J., Kulkarni, R., Saxena, P.: Demystifying incentives in the consensus computer. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 706–719. ACM (2015)
Morrison, J.P.: Flow-Based Programming: A New Approach to Application Development. CreateSpace (2010)
Ivanov, S.: Waves platform—Whitepaper (2016). https://Wavesplatform.com/files/images/whitepaper_v0.pdf
Jansen, M., Hdhili, F., Gouiaa, R., Qasem, Z.: Do smart contract languages need to be turing complete? In: Prieto, J., Das, A.K., Ferretti, S., Pinto, A., Corchado, J.M. (eds.) BLOCKCHAIN 2019. AISC, vol. 1010, pp. 19–26. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23813-1_3
Mason, D., Dave, K.: Block-based versus flow-based programming for naive programmers. In: 2017 IEEE Blocks and Beyond Workshop (BB), pp. 25–28 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/BLOCKS.2017.8120405
Money, W., Turner, A.: Application of the technology acceptance model to a knowledge management system. In: Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2004) - Track 8 (2004)
Fisher, R.A.: Theory of statistical estimation. In: Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, vol. 22. no. 5. Cambridge University Press (1925)
Gliem, J., Gliem, R.: Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s Alpha reliability coefficient for likert-type scales. In: 2003 Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing (2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hdhili, F., Gouiaa, R., Jansen, M. (2022). Implementation and Evaluation of a Visual Programming Language in the Context of Blockchain. In: Prieto, J., Partida, A., Leitão, P., Pinto, A. (eds) Blockchain and Applications. BLOCKCHAIN 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 320. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86162-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86162-9_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86161-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86162-9
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)