Skip to main content

Implementation and Evaluation of a Visual Programming Language in the Context of Blockchain

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Blockchain and Applications (BLOCKCHAIN 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 320))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1800 Accesses

Abstract

Programming is not a simple task. Besides, the learning of syntax, the obstacles often seem insurmountable for the beginner. Syntax errors frustrate and distract attention from the actual algorithms and logic that need to be understood. With the help of visual programming, syntax errors can be avoided as much as possible by using predefined graphical boxes, which, due to their shape, can only be connected correctly to form a program. Moreover, Smart Contracts are mainly designed to exclude the need to trust a third party. Here using Visual programming makes perfect sense by making the creation of Smart Contracts much simpler without the help of a developer. Another advantage of Visual Programming Language (VPL) in Smart Contract creation is that the terms and conditions in Contracts can be read and understood from non-developers. In this research we aim to implement a Visual Smart Contract Creator and to conduct an empirical evaluation, which on the one hand, measures the semantic understandability of a visual representation of a Smart Contract created with our tool and compares it to its textual representation in Ride programming language. On the other hand, we evaluate the user acceptance of the tool.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://docs.Wavesprotocol.org.

  2. 2.

    https://developers.google.com/blockly.

References

  1. Nakamoto, S.: Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system (2008). https://Bitcoin.org/Bitcoin.pdf

  2. Wright, A., De Filippi, P.: Decentralized Blockchain technology and the rise of lex cryptographia (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Swan, M.: Blockchain: Blueprint for a New Economy. O’Reilly Media, Inc. (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Luu, L., Teutsch, J., Kulkarni, R., Saxena, P.: Demystifying incentives in the consensus computer. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 706–719. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Morrison, J.P.: Flow-Based Programming: A New Approach to Application Development. CreateSpace (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ivanov, S.: Waves platform—Whitepaper (2016). https://Wavesplatform.com/files/images/whitepaper_v0.pdf

  7. Jansen, M., Hdhili, F., Gouiaa, R., Qasem, Z.: Do smart contract languages need to be turing complete? In: Prieto, J., Das, A.K., Ferretti, S., Pinto, A., Corchado, J.M. (eds.) BLOCKCHAIN 2019. AISC, vol. 1010, pp. 19–26. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23813-1_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Mason, D., Dave, K.: Block-based versus flow-based programming for naive programmers. In: 2017 IEEE Blocks and Beyond Workshop (BB), pp. 25–28 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/BLOCKS.2017.8120405

  9. Money, W., Turner, A.: Application of the technology acceptance model to a knowledge management system. In: Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2004) - Track 8 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fisher, R.A.: Theory of statistical estimation. In: Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, vol. 22. no. 5. Cambridge University Press (1925)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gliem, J., Gliem, R.: Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s Alpha reliability coefficient for likert-type scales. In: 2003 Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc Jansen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hdhili, F., Gouiaa, R., Jansen, M. (2022). Implementation and Evaluation of a Visual Programming Language in the Context of Blockchain. In: Prieto, J., Partida, A., Leitão, P., Pinto, A. (eds) Blockchain and Applications. BLOCKCHAIN 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 320. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86162-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics