Skip to main content

Design and Evaluation of Deep Learning Models for Real-Time Credibility Assessment in Twitter

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning – ICANN 2021 (ICANN 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 12895))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Social media have an enormous impact on modern life but are prone to the dissemination of false information. In several domains, such as crisis management or political communication, it is of utmost importance to detect false and to promote credible information. Although educational measures might help individuals to detect false information, the sheer volume of social big data, which sometimes need to be analysed under time-critical constraints, calls for automated and (near) real-time assessment methods. Hence, this paper reviews existing approaches before designing and evaluating three deep learning models (MLP, RNN, BERT) for real-time credibility assessment using the example of Twitter posts. While our BERT implementation achieved best results with an accuracy of up to 87.07% and an F1 score of 0.8764 when using metadata, text, and user features, MLP and RNN showed lower classification quality but better performance for real-time application. Furthermore, the paper contributes with a novel dataset for credibility assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Allcott, H., Gentzkow, M.: Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. J. Econ. Perspect. 31(2), 211–236 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Buntain, C., Golbeck, J.: Automatically identifying fake news in popular twitter threads. In: IEEE Proceedings of (SmartCloud), pp. 208–215 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Castillo, C., Mendoza, M., Poblete, B.: Information credibility on twitter. In: Proceedings of WWW, p. 675 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Castillo, C., Mendoza, M., Poblete, B.: Predicting information credibility in time-sensitive social media. Internet Res. 23(5), 560–588 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Conroy, N.K., Rubin, V.L., Chen, Y.: Automatic deception detection: methods for finding fake news. Proc. ASIS&T 52(1), 1–4 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Devlin, J., Chang, M.W., Lee, K., Toutanova, K.: BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In: Proceedings of NAACL-HLT, pp. 4171–4186 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Duan, X., Naghizade, E., Spina, D., Zhang, X.: RMIT at PAN-CLEF 2020: proling fake news spreaders on twitter. In: CLEF 2020 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Flanagin, A.J., Metzger, M.J.: Digital media and youth: unparalled opportunity and unprecedented responsibility. In: Flanagin, A.J., Metzger, M.J. (eds.) Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility, pp. 5–28 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Floria, S.A., Leon, F., Logofătu, D.: A credibility-based analysis of information diffusion in social networks. In: Kůrková, V., Manolopoulos, Y., Hammer, B., Iliadis, L., Maglogiannis, I. (eds.) Proceedings of ICANN, pp. 828–838 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fogg, B.J., Tseng, H.: The elements of computer credibility. In: Proceedings of CHI, pp. 80–87 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gupta, A., Kumaraguru, P., Castillo, C., Meier, P.: TweetCred: real-time credibility assessment of content on twitter. In: Aiello, L.M., McFarland, D. (eds.) Social Informatics, vol. 8851, pp. 228–243 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hassan, D.: A text mining approach for evaluating event credibility on twitter. In: Proceedings of WETICE, pp. 171–174 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Helmstetter, S., Paulheim, H.: Weakly supervised learning for fake news detection on twitter. In: Proceedings of ASONAM, pp. 274–277. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hutto, C., Gilbert, E.: VADER: a parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text. In: Proceedings of ICWSM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Iftene, A., Gifu, D., Miron, A.R., Dudu, M.S.: A real-time system for credibility on twitter. In: Proceedings of LREC, pp. 6166–6173 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kaufhold, M.A., Bayer, M., Hartung, D., Reuter, C.: Paper Appendix (2021). https://github.com/mkx89-sci/KaufholdBayerHartungReuter2021_ICANN

  17. Kaufhold, M.A., Reuter, C.: Cultural violence and peace in social media. In: Reuter, C. (ed.) Information Technology for Peace and Security - IT-Applications and Infrastructures in Conflicts, Crises, War, and Peace, pp. 361–381 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kaufhold, M.A.: Information Refinement Technologies for Crisis Informatics: User Expectations and Design Principles for Social Media and Mobile Apps (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kaufhold, M.A., Bayer, M., Reuter, C.: Rapid relevance classification of social media posts in disasters and emergencies: a system and evaluation featuring active, incremental and online learning. IP&M 57(1), 102132 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kingma, D.P., Ba, J.: Adam: a method for stochastic optimization (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lazer, D.M.J., et al.: The science of fake news. Science 359(6380), 1094–1096 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu, X., Nourbakhsh, A., Li, Q., Fang, R., Shah, S.: Real-time rumor debunking on twitter. In: Proceedings of CIKM, pp. 1867–1870 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Liu, Y., Wu, Y.F.B.: Early detection of fake news on social media through propagation path classification with recurrent and convolutional networks. In: Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ma, J., et al.: Detecting rumors from microblogs with recurrent neural networks. In: IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 3818–3824 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mitra, T., Gilbert, E.: CREDBANK: a large-scale social media corpus with associated credibility annotations. In: Proceedings of ICWSM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pennington, J., Socher, R., Manning, C.: Glove: global vectors for word representation. In: Proceedings of EMNLP, pp. 1532–1543 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pierri, F., Ceri, S.: False news on social media: a data-driven Survey. ACM SIGMOD Record 48(2), 18–27 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Qazvinian, V., Rosengren, E., Radev, D.R., Mei, Q.: Rumor has it: identifying misinformation in microblogs. In: Proceedings of EMNLP, pp. 1589–1599 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rangel, F., Giachanou, A., Ghanem, B., Rosso, P.: Overview of the 8th Author Proling Task at PAN 2020: Proling Fake News Spreaders on Twitter (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ratkiewicz, J., et al.: Truthy: mapping the spread of astroturf in microblog streams. In: Proceedings of WWW, p. 249 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ruchansky, N., Seo, S., Liu, Y.: CSI: a hybrid deep model for fake news detection. In: Proceedings of CIKM, pp. 797–806 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sanh, V., Debut, L., Chaumond, J., Wolf, T.: DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Shu, K., Mahudeswaran, D., Wang, S., Lee, D., Liu, H.: FakeNewsNet: a data repository with news content, social context and dynamic information for studying fake news on social media. Big Data 8(3) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Shu, K., Sliva, A., Wang, S., Tang, J., Liu, H.: Fake news detection on social media: a data mining perspective. ACM SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 19(1), 22–36 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tandoc, E.C., Lim, Z.W., Ling, R.: Defining “fake news’’: a typology of scholarly definitions. Digit. Journal. 6(2), 137–153 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Tian, L., Zhang, X., Peng, M.: FakeFinder: twitter fake news detection on mobile. In: Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference, vol. 2020, pp. 79–80 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tian, L., Zhang, X., Wang, Y., Liu, H.: Early detection of rumours on twitter via stance transfer learning. In: Jose, J.M., et al. (eds.) Advances in Information Retrieval, vol. 12035, pp. 575–588 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Viviani, M., Pasi, G.: Credibility in social media: opinions, news, and health information-a survey: credibility in social media. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 7(5), e1209 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wu, L., Rao, Y., Yu, H., Wang, Y., Nazir, A.: False information detection on social media via a hybrid deep model. In: Staab, S., Koltsova, O., Ignatov, D.I. (eds.) SocInfo 2018. LNCS, vol. 11186, pp. 323–333. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01159-8_31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. Xia, X., Yang, X., Wu, C., Li, S., Bao, L.: Information credibility on twitter in emergency situation. In: Chau, M., Wang, G.A., Yue, W.T., Chen, H. (eds.) PAISI 2012. LNCS, vol. 7299, pp. 45–59. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30428-6_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. Zubiaga, A., Liakata, M., Procter, R., Wong Sak Hoi, G., Tolmie, P.: Analysing how people orient to and spread rumours in social media by looking at conversational threads. PLoS ONE 11(3), e0150989 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been co-funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) in the project CYWARN (No. 13N15407) and by the BMBF and the Hessen State Ministry for Higher Education, Research and Arts (HMKW) within the SecUrban mission of the National Research Center for Applied Cybersecurity ATHENE.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc-André Kaufhold .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kaufhold, MA., Bayer, M., Hartung, D., Reuter, C. (2021). Design and Evaluation of Deep Learning Models for Real-Time Credibility Assessment in Twitter. In: Farkaš, I., Masulli, P., Otte, S., Wermter, S. (eds) Artificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning – ICANN 2021. ICANN 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12895. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86383-8_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86383-8_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86382-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86383-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics