Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Through the Lens of Different Stakeholders: Development and Application of a Change Management Guideline for Flipped Classroom Implementations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computer Supported Education (CSEDU 2020)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1473))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 827 Accesses

Abstract

Teaching is becoming increasingly digital: At higher education institutions, more and more face-to-face courses are being replaced by digital teaching formats. At least since the outbreak of the corona pandemic, the introduction of digital teaching methods has been pushed forward under high pressure. This change has an effect on numerous stakeholders. However, there are still only a few recommendations or strategic approaches that show the stakeholders what tasks they and others should take. There is a lack of a general guideline on which all parties involved can orient themselves in order to introduce digital teaching jointly and efficiently. Based on a literature review, this paper presents such a Change Management Guideline identifying stakeholders, tasks and responsibilities. For such a digital change, cooperation between different stakeholders is indispensable. However, the distribution of tasks and cooperation in practice could deviate from theory and, furthermore, be experienced differently by those involved. The aim of this work is to use the guideline in order to identify the tasks and responsibilities through the lens of different stakeholders at a German university. In addition, the cooperation should be investigated through the different perspectives. For this purpose, stakeholders were surveyed in order to identify their point of view. Finally, recommendations for optimizing cooperation and thus a successful transition to digital teaching formats will be presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Durak, G., Ataizi, M.: The ABC’s of online course design according to Addie model. Univ. J. Educ. Res. 4(9), 2084–2091 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bouhnik, D., Marcus, T.: Interaction in distance-learning courses. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 57(3), 299–305 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ward, J., LaBranche, G.A.: Blended learning: the convergence of e-learning and meetings. Franchising World 35(4), 22–24 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Moiseienko, N.V., Ozarko, I.I.: Types of blended learning. Science and education a new dimension. Pedagogy Psychol. 76(187), 47–50 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tayebinik, M., Puteh, M.: Blended learning or e-learning? Int. Mag. Adv. Comput. Sci. Telecommun. (IMACST) 3(1), 103–110 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bergmann, J., Sams, A.: Flip your Classroom. Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. International Society for Technology in Education (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bishop, J.L., Verleger, M.A.: The flipped classroom: a survey of the research. In: 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, pp. 1–18 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Berglund, A., et al.: The pedagogical developers initiative – systematic shifts, serendipities, and setbacks. In: 13th International CDIO Conference in Calgary, Canada (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Blömer, L., Droit, A., Hoppe, U.: Enabling stakeholders to change: development of a change management guideline for flipped classroom implementations. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, Prague, pp. 227–237. SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Webster, J., Watson, R.T.: Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review. MIS Q. 26(2), xiii–xxiii (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schryen, G.: Writing qualitative is literature reviews-guidelines for synthesis, interpretation, and guidance of research. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 37(1), 286–325 (2015)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Bondarev, M., Opryshko, A., Trach, A.: University students’ readiness for e-learning: replacing or supplementing face-to-face classroom learning. In: The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences (EpSBS), pp. 1151–1160 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Adekola, J., Dale, V.H.M., Gardiner, K.: Development of an institutional framework to guide transitions into enhanced blended learning in higher education. Res. Learn. Technol. 25, 1–16 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Charbonneau-Gowdy, P., Chavez, J.: Endpoint: insights for theory development in a blended learning program in Chile. In: Andreatos, A., Sgouropoulou, C., Ntalianis, K. (eds.) ECEL 2018, 17th European Conference on e-Learning, Athens, vol. 17, pp. 81–89. Academic Conferences Limited (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Daniel, M., Hüther, J., Ohngemach, C.: Smile–Studierende als Multiplikatoren für innovative und digitale Lehre. In: Krömker, D., Schroeder, U. (eds.) DeLFI 2018, Die 16. E-Learning Fachtagung Informatik, vol. 16, pp. 57–68. Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V., Bonn (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Collyer, S., Campbell, C.: Enabling pervasive change: a higher education case study. In: Carliner, S., Fulford, C., Ostashewski, N. (eds.) EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2015, World Conference on Educational Media and Technology, Montreal, Quebec, pp. 249–255. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dann, C.E.: Blended learning 3.0: getting students on board. In: Uskov, V.L., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C., Vlacic, L. (eds.) KES SEEL-18 2018. SIST, vol. 99, pp. 214–223. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92363-5_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Dion, G., et al.: Change management: blended learning adoption in a large network of European universities. In: Ivala, E. (eds.) 13th International Conference on e-Learning, ICEL 2018, Cape Town, vol. 13, pp. 77–83. ACPI (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Harris, B.F., Harris, J., Reed, L., Zelihic, M.M.: Flipped classroom: another tool for your pedagogy tool box. Dev. Bus. Simul. Exp. Learn. 43, 325–333 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hurtubise, L., Hall, E., Sheridan, L., Han, H.: The flipped classroom in medical education: engaging students to build competency. J. Med. Educ. Curric. Dev. 2, 35–43 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hutchings, M., Quinney, A.: The flipped classroom, disruptive pedagogies, enabling technologies and wicked problems: responding to ‘the bomb in the basement.’ Electron. J. e-Learn. 13(2), 106–119 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Iqbal, S., Ahmad, S., Willis, I.: Influencing factors for adopting technology enhanced learning in the medical schools of Punjab, Pakistan. Int. J. Inf. Commun. Technol. Educ. (IJICTE) 13(3), 27–39 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schoop, E., Köhler, T., Börner, C., Schulz, J.: Consolidating eLearning in a higher education institution: an organisational issue integrating didactics, technology, and people by the means of an eLearning strategy. In: Köhler, T., Schoop, E., Kahnwald, N. (eds.) GeNeMe 2016 as part of IFKAD 2016, Knowledge Communities in Online Education and (Visual) Knowledge Management, vol. 19, pp. 39–50. Verlag der Wissenschaft, Dresden (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Liebscher, J., Petschenka, A., Gollan, H., Heinrich, S., van Ackeren, I., Ganseuer, C.: E-Learning-Strategie an der Universität Duisburg-Essen - mehr als ein Artefakt? Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung (ZFHE) 10(2), 93–109 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Morisse, K.: Inverted classroom in der Hochschullehre–Chancen, Hemmnisse und Erfolgsfaktoren. In: Haag, J., Freisleben-Teutscher, F. (eds.) Inverted Classroom and Beyond, Das Inverted Classroom Modell, vol. 5, pp. 17–28. Fachhochschule St. Pölten, Wien (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nordquist, J., Sundberg, K., Laing, A.: Aligning physical learning spaces with the curriculum: AMEE Guide No. 107. Med. Teach. 38(8), 755–768 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Owen, H., Dunham, N.: Reflections on the Use of iterative, agile and collaborative approaches for blended flipped learning development. Educ. Sci. 5(2), 85–103 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pisoni, G., Marchese, M., Renouard, F.: Benefits and challenges of distributed student activities in online education settings: cross-university collaborations on a pan-European level. In: Ashmawy, A.K., Schreiter, S. (eds.) 2019 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON 2019, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, vol. 10, pp. 1017–1021. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Van Twembeke, E., Goeman, K.: Motivation gets you going and habit gets you there. Educ. Res. 60(1), 62–79 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. White, P.J., et al.: Adopting an active learning approach to teaching in a research-intensive higher education context transformed staff teaching attitudes and behaviours. High. Educ. Res. Dev. 35(3), 619–633 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Collyer, S., Campbell, C.: Enabling pervasive change: a higher education case study. In: Carliner, S., Fulford, C., Ostashewski, N. (eds.) EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2015, World Conference on Educational Media and Technology, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, pp. 468–474. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Niedersächsisches Ministerium für Wissenschaft und Kultur. https://www.mwk.niedersachsen.de/startseite/aktuelles/presseinformationen/qualitaet-plus-48-projekte-zur-verbesserung-der-studienqualitaet-ausgewaehlt-170631.html. Accessed 19 Aug 2020

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Osnabrueck University, Katharienenstr. 3, 49074, Osnabrueck, Germany

    Jonas Kötter, Linda Blömer, Christin Voigt, Alena Droit & Uwe Hoppe

Authors
  1. Jonas Kötter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Linda Blömer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christin Voigt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Alena Droit
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Uwe Hoppe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonas Kötter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA

    H. Chad Lane

  2. University of Denver, Denver, CO, USA

    Susan Zvacek

  3. School of Engineering, University of Ulster, Newtownabbey, UK

    James Uhomoibhi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kötter, J., Blömer, L., Voigt, C., Droit, A., Hoppe, U. (2021). Through the Lens of Different Stakeholders: Development and Application of a Change Management Guideline for Flipped Classroom Implementations. In: Lane, H.C., Zvacek, S., Uhomoibhi, J. (eds) Computer Supported Education. CSEDU 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1473. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86439-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86439-2_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86438-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86439-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation