Skip to main content

Predicting Student Performance in Experiential Education

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12923))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1382 Accesses

Abstract

Experiential learning is a key development area of artificial intelligence in education (AIEd). It aims to provide learners with intuitive environments for autonomous knowledge formation and discovery through interactive experiences. However, experiential learning in AIEd faces two main challenges. Firstly, measuring learning performances in unstructured and informal educational settings is difficult. Secondly, providing frequent or timely feedback on student performance is inefficient. To address these issues, this paper explores using natural language processing (NLP) and the tool for the automatic analysis of cohesion (TAACO) features as indicators of student performance in an experiential learning course. Both NLP and TAACO features were tested on a baseline CART decision tree (DT) machine learning (ML) model with and without a grade population distribution mask to predict student final scores at the end of the course. Our results show that (1), the use of a distribution specific Gaussian mask significantly increases prediction accuracy of the CART DT. (2), NLP and TAACO features provide high information value for ML prediction tasks. (3), the CART DT is able to accurately classify learner grade scores against human assessments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://gohwils.github.io/biodatascience/deep_programme.html.

  2. 2.

    https://spacy.io/.

  3. 3.

    https://www.linguisticanalysistools.org/taaco.html.

  4. 4.

    https://dr.ntu.edu.sg/handle/10356/78232?mode=full.

  5. 5.

    https://www.kaggle.com.

References

  1. Chawla, N.V., Bowyer, K.W., Hall, L.O., Kegelmeyer, W.P.: SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 16, 321–357 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bourgault du Coudray, C.: Theory and praxis in experiential education: some insights from gestalt therapy. J. Experiential Educ. 43(2), 156–170 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  3. De Myttenaere, A., Golden, B., Le Grand, B., Rossi, F.: Mean absolute percentage error for regression models. Neurocomputing 192, 38–48 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Domingos, P., Hulten, G.: Mining high-speed data streams, pp. 71–80 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Duncan, T.G., McKeachie, W.J.: The making of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educ. Psychol. 40(2), 117–128 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gulz, A., Londos, L., Haake, M.: Preschoolers’ understanding of a teachable agent-based game in early mathematics as reflected in their gaze behaviors-an experimental study. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 30(1), 1–36 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jiang, W., Pardos, Z.A.: Towards equity and algorithmic fairness in student grade prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.06604 (2021)

  8. Karthikeyan, R., Satheesbabu, S., Gokulakrishnan, P.: Machine learning based student performance analysis system. Inf. Technol. Ind. 9(1), 1174–1181 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kolb, D.: The process of experiential. Adult Continuing Educ. Teach. Learn. Res. 4, 159 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kolb, D.A., Boyatzis, R.E., Mainemelis, C., et al.: Experiential learning theory: previous research and new directions. Perspect. Think. Learn. Cogn. Styles 1(8), 227–247 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rutkowski, L., Jaworski, M., Pietruczuk, L., Duda, P.: Decision trees for mining data streams based on the gaussian approximation. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 26(1), 108–119 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Seno-Alday, S., Budde-Sung, A.: Teaching a while measuring b: cultural bias in assessing student performance. J. Int. Educ. Bus. (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sharma, H., Kumar, S.: A survey on decision tree algorithms of classification in data mining. Int. J. Sci. Res. (IJSR) 5(4), 2094–2097 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Wong, T.T.: Performance evaluation of classification algorithms by k-fold and leave-one-out cross validation. Pattern Recogn. 48(9), 2839–2846 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

CC Sze, WWB Goh and OK Tan acknowledge support from an ACE grant, NTU.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wilson Wen Bin Goh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lin, L., Tan, L.W.L., Kan, N.H.L., Tan, O.K., Sze, C.C., Goh, W.W.B. (2021). Predicting Student Performance in Experiential Education. In: Strauss, C., Kotsis, G., Tjoa, A.M., Khalil, I. (eds) Database and Expert Systems Applications. DEXA 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12923. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86472-9_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86472-9_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86471-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86472-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics