Abstract
Our life depends more and more on intelligent machines that help us carry out our work or have completely taken our place in tasks which used to be wholly human. This also applies to the field of care and assistance for the sick and fragile: indeed, carebots are increasingly present by the patient’s bed and can collaborate in care work. However carebots are not objects like others that we use in our everyday life: unlike the tools through which we do things, robots have (and will more and more have) some level of autonomy. We intend to consider the type of relationship it is right to build with these devices and ask whether intelligent robots deserve some moral and legal relevance. The robot may be seen as a slave or an entity with which we can form friendships or loving relationships: we will maintain that it is our responsibility to prepare for future scenarios in which increasingly intelligent, autonomous machines will be not mere tools, but significant life companions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Balistreri, M., Casile, F.: Care robots: from tools of care to training opportunities. moral considerations. In: Popescu, E., Gil, A.B., Lancia, L., Sica, L.S., Mavroudi, A. (eds.) MIS4TEL 2019. AISC, vol. 1008, pp. 18–25. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23884-1_3
Balistreri, M.: Sex robots. El amor en tiempos de máquinas, Malpaso Holdings (2021)
Bryson, J.J.: Robots Should Be Slaves. In: Wilks, Y. (ed.) Close Engagements with Artificial Companions: Key Social, Psychological, Ethical and Design Issue, pp. 63–74. John Benjamins, Amsterdam (2010)
Sparrow, R.: Robots, rape, and representation. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 9(4), 465–477 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-017-0413-z
Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics, translated and edited by Roger Crisp, Cambridge University Press, book VIII and IX (2000)
Danaher, J.: The philosophical case for robot friendship. J. Posthuman Stud. 3(1), 5–24 (2019)
Hume, D.: A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford University Press, T 2.3.3 (2000)
Dumouchel, P., Damiano, L.: Living with Robots. Harvard University Press (2017)
Fabris, A.: Can we trust machines? The role of trust in technological environments. In: Fabris, A. (ed.) Trust 2020. SAPERE, vol. 54, pp. 123–135. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44018-3_9
Bodei, R.: Dominio e sottomissione. Schiavi, animali, macchine, intelligenza artificiale, Il Mulino (2019)
Umbrello, S., Capasso, M., Balistreri, M., Pirni, A., Merenda, F.: Expanding Care-Centered Value Sensitive Design: Design Care Robots with AI for Social Good Norms, Mind and Machines (2021)
Pirni, A., Balistreri, M., Merenda, F., Umbrello, S., Capasso, M.: Robot Care Ethics, between Vulnerabilily and Autonomy: Coupling Principles and Practices in Autonomous Systems for Care, Frontiers in Robotics and AI (2021)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Balistreri, M., Casile, F. (2022). Care Robots and Bioethics: A Discussion Paper on Moral Standing of New Training Opportunities. In: De la Prieta, F., et al. Methodologies and Intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning, 11th International Conference. MIS4TEL 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 326. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86618-1_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86618-1_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86617-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86618-1
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)