Skip to main content

Scenarios for Graph Algorithmic Thinking Co-created with Teachers

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Methodologies and Intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning, 11th International Conference (MIS4TEL 2021)

Abstract

This paper revolves around graph algorithmic thinking, related to graphs and their properties. Algorithms for graphs are used to investigate problems young learners are familiar with, such as how information is spread in a social network. However, graph algorithmic thinking is not taught at school. School teachers, besides learners, are often unfamiliar with it. This paper stems from research for introducing teachers to graph algorithmic thinking. Research in the field highlighted the importance of creating learning scenarios with teachers so as to bring graph algorithmic thinking into schools and promote learning. This paper explains how learning scenarios were created with secondary-school teachers and how they were used to structure interventions without computers in a secondary school. Learning results are satisfactory and they are reflected over in the conclusions to promote further scenario-based interventions for graph algorithmic thinking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bell, T., Alexander, J., Freeman, I., Grimley, M.: Computer science without computers: new outreach methods from old tricks. In: Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the National Advisory Committee on Computing Qualifications (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bellettini, C., et al.: Extracurricular activities for improving the perception of informatics in secondary schools. In: Informatics in Schools. Teaching and Learning Perspectives, pp. 161–172. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09958-3_15

  3. Bischof, E., Mittermeir, R.: Informatik erleben. Institut fur Informatik-Systeme, Alpen-Adria University Klagenfurt. http://informatik-erleben.uni-klu.ac.at (2008)

  4. Bocconi, S., et al.: Developing computational thinking in compulsory education. European Commission, JRC Science for Policy Report (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bonani, A.: Interactive objects for the scaffolding of graph algorithmic thinking at school. Ph.D. thesis, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bonani, A., Bollin, A., Gennari, R.: Touch, see and talk: tangibles for engaging learners into graph algorithmic thinking. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction. INTERACT 2021 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bonani, A., Del Fatto, V., Gennari, R.: The evolving design of tangibles for graph algorithmic thinking. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI 2018), pp. 65–72. ACM, New York (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Corradini, I., Lodi, M., Nardelli, E.: Conceptions and misconceptions about computational thinking among italian primary school teachers. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ICER 2017), pp. 136–144. ACM, New York (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3105726.3106194

  9. Di Mascio, T., Gennari, R., Melonio, A., Vittorini, P.: The user classes building process in a TEL project. In: International Workshop on Evidence-Based Technology Enhanced Learning, pp. 107–114. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28801-2_13

  10. Di Mascio, T., Gennari, R., Tarantino, L., Vittorini, P.: Designing visualizations of temporal relations for children: action research meets HCI. Multimedia Tools Appl. 76(4), 4855–4893 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-016-3609-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Döbeli Honegger, B., Hielscher, M.: Vom lehrplan zur lehrerinnenbildung-erste erfahrungen mit obligatorischer informatikdidaktik für angehende schweizer primarlehrerinnen. Informatische Bildung zum Verstehen und Gestalten der digitalen Welt (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dodero, G., Gennari, R., Melonio, A., Torello, S.: “There is no rose without a thorn”: an assessment of a game design experience for children. In: Proceedings of the 11th Biannual Conference on Italian SIGCHI Chapter (CHItaly 2015), pp. 10–17. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Futschek, G.: Algorithmic thinking: the key for understanding computer science. In: Informatics Education–The Bridge Between Using and Understanding Computers, pp. 159–168. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11915355_15

  14. Gennari, R., Melonio, A., Rizvi, M.: Evolving tangibles for children’s social learning through conversations: beyond TurnTalk. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interactions (TEI 2018). ACM, New York (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gracenea, M., et al.: New roles and learning scenarios in the training of the novice teachers at the university of Barcelona. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 196, 96–99 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lamagna, E.A.: Algorithmic thinking unplugged. J. Comput. Sci. Coll. 30(6), 45–52 (2015). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2753024.2753036

  17. Lewin, K.: Action research and minority problems. J. Soc. Issues 2(4), 34–46 (1946)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Martens, B., Demoen, B., Karpez, F., Vandenhove, D., Van Loon, K.: Bringing algorithms to Flemish classrooms: teaching the teachers, and some students. In: Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on Primary and Secondary Computing Education, pp. 103–104. ACM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pedro, A., Piedade, J., Matos, J.F., Pedro, N.: Redesigning initial teacher’s education practices with learning scenarios. Int. J. Inf. Learn. Technol. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-11-2018-0131

  20. Rosson, M.B., Carroll, J.M.: Scenario-based design. In: Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 161–180. CRC Press (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sands, P., Yadav, A., Good, J.: Computational thinking in k-12: in-service teacher perceptions of computational thinking. In: Computational Thinking in the STEM Disciplines, pp. 151–164. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93566-9_8

  22. Wing, J.M.: Computational thinking. Commun. ACM 49(3), 33–35 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yadav, A., Gretter, S., Good, J., McLean, T.: Computational thinking in teacher education. In: Emerging Research, Practice, and Policy on Computational Thinking, pp. 205–220. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52691-1_13

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Bonani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bonani, A., Gennari, R., Mahlknecht, G. (2022). Scenarios for Graph Algorithmic Thinking Co-created with Teachers. In: De la Prieta, F., et al. Methodologies and Intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning, 11th International Conference. MIS4TEL 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 326. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86618-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics