Abstract
Nowadays, given the rapid changes due to the fourth industrial revolution, information and communication technology designers often find themselves without space and time to learn while working. This issue is especially evident for on-chip monitoring system designers: usually, they have to face significant design challenges due to the complexity and heterogeneity of the systems to be monitored. To meet their needs, in this paper, an “on-the-job” Technology-Enhanced Learning environment, called MONICA, is proposed. The paper especially focuses on the MONICA learning model that serves as a guide for designers to improve their knowledge of the monitoring system domain at the same moment they are “on-the-job”. Moreover, an empirical evaluation of the MONICA learning model is reported, demonstrating its effectiveness and highlighting the designer’s satisfaction.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al-Ars, Z., et al.: The FitOptiVis ECSEL project: highly efficient distributed embedded image/video processing in cyber-physical systems. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers, pp. 333–338. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2019)
Arora, D., Ravi, S., Raghunathan, A., Jha, N.K.: Secure embedded processing through hardware-assisted run-time monitoring. In: Design, Automation and Test in Europe, pp. 178–183. IEEE Computer Society (2005)
Batalla-Busquets, J.M., Pacheco-Bernal, C.: On-the-job e-learning: workers’ attitudes and perceptions. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 14(1), 40–64 (2013)
Berings, M.G., Doornbos, A.J., Simons, P.R.J.: Methodological practices in on-the-job learning research. Human Resour. Dev. Int. 9(3), 333–363 (2006)
Bleich, C.: 36 eLearning statistics: 2021 key insights to shape our year (2021). https://www.edgepointlearning.com/blog/elearning-statistics/. Accessed 24 May 2021
Caruso, F., Di Mascio, T., Valente, G., Tarantino, L.: MONICA vision: an approach, a model and the interactive tools for cyber-physical systems designers. In: Proceedings of 14th Biannual Conference of the Italian SIGCHI Chapter (CHItaly 2021) (2021)
Carver, J.C., Syriani, E., Gray, J.: Assessing the frequency of empirical evaluation in software modeling research. EESSMod 785 (2011)
Chen, H.J.: Linking employees’ e-learning system use to their overall job outcomes: An empirical study based on the is success model. Comput. Educ. 55(4), 1628–1639 (2010)
Chin, D.N.: Empirical evaluation of user models and user-adapted systems. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 11(1), 181–194 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011127315884
Coskun, A.K., Rosing, T.S., Gross, K.C.: Utilizing predictors for efficient thermal management in multiprocessor SoCs. IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Des. Integr. Circ. Syst. 28(10), 1503–1516 (2009)
DEV.to: Why most developers prefer the dark theme ide? (2021). https://dev.to/surajondev/why-most-developers-prefer-the-dark-theme-ide-1ml7
Eraut, M.: Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 70(1), 113–136 (2000)
Grimm, P.: Social Desirability Bias. Wiley, Hoboken (2010)
Hortovanyi, L., Ferincz, A.: The impact of ICT on learning on-the-job. Learn. Organ. (2015)
Kervyn, N., Fiske, S.T., Yzerbyt, V.Y.: Integrating the stereotype content model (warmth and competence) and the Osgood semantic differential (evaluation, potency, and activity). Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 43(7), 673–681 (2013)
Kornaros, G., Pnevmatikatos, D.: A survey and taxonomy of on-chip monitoring of multicore systems-on-chip. ACM Trans. Des. Autom. Electron. Syst. (TODAES) 18(2), 1–38 (2013)
Lieberman, H.: The tyranny of evaluation. Accessed 2 Oct 2008 (2003). https://web.media.mit.edu/~lieber/Misc/Tyranny-Evaluation.html
Lojo, A., et al.: The ECSEL fractal project: a cognitive fractal and secure edge based on a unique open-safe-reliable-low power hardware platform. In: 2020 23rd Euromicro Conference on Digital System Design (DSD), pp. 393–400 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/DSD51259.2020.00069
Mavrikios, D., Papakostas, N., Mourtzis, D., Chryssolouris, G.: On industrial learning and training for the factories of the future: a conceptual, cognitive and technology framework. J. Intell. Manufact. 24(3), 473–485 (2013)
Monica learning model - clusters and parameters (2021). https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-xaZj6wMCIyPEgENv1zuJLdJj3npHGVBNzLPHLXOwa8/edit?usp=sharing
Niewöhner, N., Asmar, L., Röltgen, D., Kühn, A., Dumitrescu, R.: The impact of the 4th industrial revolution on the design fields of innovation management. Procedia CIRP 91, 43–48 (2020)
Osgood, C.E., Suci, G.J., Tannenbaum, P.H.: The Measurement of Meaning. University of Illinois Press, Champaign (1957)
Patrick, W.: Recognising non-formal and informal learning. Outcomes, policies and practices, vol. 2009, no. 35. OECD Publishing, Berlin (2010)
Pomante, L., et al.: Design and management of image processing pipelines within CPS: 2 years of experience from the FitOptiVis ECSEL project. In: 2020 23rd Euromicro Conference on Digital System Design (DSD), pp. 378–385 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/DSD51259.2020.00067
Sauter, E.: The risks and opportunities of learning on the job. Vocat. Train., 14–24 (1999)
Schrepp, M., Hinderks, A., Thomaschewski, J.: Design and evaluation of a short version of the user experience questionnaire (UEQ-S). IJIMAI 4(6), 103–108 (2017)
Tudor, S.L.: Formal-non-formal-informal in education. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 76, 821–826 (2013)
Valente, G., Fanni, T., Sau, C., Di Mascio, T., Pomante, L., Palumbo, F.: A composable monitoring system for heterogeneous embedded platforms. ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst. 20(5), 1–34 (2021)
Valente, G., et al.: SPOF-slave powerlink on FPGA for smart sensors and actuators interfacing for industry 4.0 applications. Energies 12(9) (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/en12091633. https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/9/1633
Wang, C.X., Kinuthia, W.: Defining technology enhanced learning environment for pre-service teachers. In: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, pp. 2724–2727. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Caruso, F., Di Mascio, T., Peretti, S., Pomante, L., Valente, G. (2022). MONICA “On-the-Job” Technology-Enhanced Learning Environment: An Empirical Evaluation. In: De la Prieta, F., et al. Methodologies and Intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning, 11th International Conference. MIS4TEL 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 326. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86618-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86618-1_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86617-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86618-1
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)