Skip to main content

MONICA “On-the-Job” Technology-Enhanced Learning Environment: An Empirical Evaluation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Methodologies and Intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning, 11th International Conference (MIS4TEL 2021)

Abstract

Nowadays, given the rapid changes due to the fourth industrial revolution, information and communication technology designers often find themselves without space and time to learn while working. This issue is especially evident for on-chip monitoring system designers: usually, they have to face significant design challenges due to the complexity and heterogeneity of the systems to be monitored. To meet their needs, in this paper, an “on-the-job” Technology-Enhanced Learning environment, called MONICA, is proposed. The paper especially focuses on the MONICA learning model that serves as a guide for designers to improve their knowledge of the monitoring system domain at the same moment they are “on-the-job”. Moreover, an empirical evaluation of the MONICA learning model is reported, demonstrating its effectiveness and highlighting the designer’s satisfaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Ars, Z., et al.: The FitOptiVis ECSEL project: highly efficient distributed embedded image/video processing in cyber-physical systems. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers, pp. 333–338. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arora, D., Ravi, S., Raghunathan, A., Jha, N.K.: Secure embedded processing through hardware-assisted run-time monitoring. In: Design, Automation and Test in Europe, pp. 178–183. IEEE Computer Society (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Batalla-Busquets, J.M., Pacheco-Bernal, C.: On-the-job e-learning: workers’ attitudes and perceptions. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 14(1), 40–64 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berings, M.G., Doornbos, A.J., Simons, P.R.J.: Methodological practices in on-the-job learning research. Human Resour. Dev. Int. 9(3), 333–363 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bleich, C.: 36 eLearning statistics: 2021 key insights to shape our year (2021). https://www.edgepointlearning.com/blog/elearning-statistics/. Accessed 24 May 2021

  6. Caruso, F., Di Mascio, T., Valente, G., Tarantino, L.: MONICA vision: an approach, a model and the interactive tools for cyber-physical systems designers. In: Proceedings of 14th Biannual Conference of the Italian SIGCHI Chapter (CHItaly 2021) (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Carver, J.C., Syriani, E., Gray, J.: Assessing the frequency of empirical evaluation in software modeling research. EESSMod 785 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, H.J.: Linking employees’ e-learning system use to their overall job outcomes: An empirical study based on the is success model. Comput. Educ. 55(4), 1628–1639 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chin, D.N.: Empirical evaluation of user models and user-adapted systems. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 11(1), 181–194 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011127315884

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Coskun, A.K., Rosing, T.S., Gross, K.C.: Utilizing predictors for efficient thermal management in multiprocessor SoCs. IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Des. Integr. Circ. Syst. 28(10), 1503–1516 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. DEV.to: Why most developers prefer the dark theme ide? (2021). https://dev.to/surajondev/why-most-developers-prefer-the-dark-theme-ide-1ml7

  12. Eraut, M.: Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 70(1), 113–136 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Grimm, P.: Social Desirability Bias. Wiley, Hoboken (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Hortovanyi, L., Ferincz, A.: The impact of ICT on learning on-the-job. Learn. Organ. (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kervyn, N., Fiske, S.T., Yzerbyt, V.Y.: Integrating the stereotype content model (warmth and competence) and the Osgood semantic differential (evaluation, potency, and activity). Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 43(7), 673–681 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kornaros, G., Pnevmatikatos, D.: A survey and taxonomy of on-chip monitoring of multicore systems-on-chip. ACM Trans. Des. Autom. Electron. Syst. (TODAES) 18(2), 1–38 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lieberman, H.: The tyranny of evaluation. Accessed 2 Oct 2008 (2003). https://web.media.mit.edu/~lieber/Misc/Tyranny-Evaluation.html

  18. Lojo, A., et al.: The ECSEL fractal project: a cognitive fractal and secure edge based on a unique open-safe-reliable-low power hardware platform. In: 2020 23rd Euromicro Conference on Digital System Design (DSD), pp. 393–400 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/DSD51259.2020.00069

  19. Mavrikios, D., Papakostas, N., Mourtzis, D., Chryssolouris, G.: On industrial learning and training for the factories of the future: a conceptual, cognitive and technology framework. J. Intell. Manufact. 24(3), 473–485 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Monica learning model - clusters and parameters (2021). https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-xaZj6wMCIyPEgENv1zuJLdJj3npHGVBNzLPHLXOwa8/edit?usp=sharing

  21. Niewöhner, N., Asmar, L., Röltgen, D., Kühn, A., Dumitrescu, R.: The impact of the 4th industrial revolution on the design fields of innovation management. Procedia CIRP 91, 43–48 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Osgood, C.E., Suci, G.J., Tannenbaum, P.H.: The Measurement of Meaning. University of Illinois Press, Champaign (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Patrick, W.: Recognising non-formal and informal learning. Outcomes, policies and practices, vol. 2009, no. 35. OECD Publishing, Berlin (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pomante, L., et al.: Design and management of image processing pipelines within CPS: 2 years of experience from the FitOptiVis ECSEL project. In: 2020 23rd Euromicro Conference on Digital System Design (DSD), pp. 378–385 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/DSD51259.2020.00067

  25. Sauter, E.: The risks and opportunities of learning on the job. Vocat. Train., 14–24 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schrepp, M., Hinderks, A., Thomaschewski, J.: Design and evaluation of a short version of the user experience questionnaire (UEQ-S). IJIMAI 4(6), 103–108 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tudor, S.L.: Formal-non-formal-informal in education. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 76, 821–826 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Valente, G., Fanni, T., Sau, C., Di Mascio, T., Pomante, L., Palumbo, F.: A composable monitoring system for heterogeneous embedded platforms. ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst. 20(5), 1–34 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Valente, G., et al.: SPOF-slave powerlink on FPGA for smart sensors and actuators interfacing for industry 4.0 applications. Energies 12(9) (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/en12091633. https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/9/1633

  30. Wang, C.X., Kinuthia, W.: Defining technology enhanced learning environment for pre-service teachers. In: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, pp. 2724–2727. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work is part of the FitOptiVis project [1, 24] funded by the ECSEL Joint Undertaking under grant number H2020-ECSEL-2017-2-783162.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Federica Caruso .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Caruso, F., Di Mascio, T., Peretti, S., Pomante, L., Valente, G. (2022). MONICA “On-the-Job” Technology-Enhanced Learning Environment: An Empirical Evaluation. In: De la Prieta, F., et al. Methodologies and Intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning, 11th International Conference. MIS4TEL 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 326. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86618-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics