Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Party Cues and Trust in Remote Internet Voting: Data from Estonia 2005–2019

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Electronic Voting (E-Vote-ID 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 12900))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Trust is crucial for the adoption and use of new technologies. This paper seeks to advance our knowledge of why people trust or distrust disruptive electoral technologies such as remote internet voting. It argues that because of the complexity of the systems in question, most potential users are unable to form independent opinions on the system’s trustworthiness and are likely to rely on cues provided by trusted social actors such as their preferred political parties. The paper develops a set of hypotheses from this conjecture, and tests these with survey data on approximately 5200 Estonian voters in the context of 11 elections held between 2005 and 2019. The findings suggest that partisan attachments are an important determinant of trust in e-voting and that the partisan gap in trust cannot be reduced to differences in socio-demographic voter profiles. Our results, however, do not support the conjecture that less educated individuals are particularly likely to take cues from their preferred parties when assessing the trustworthiness of e-voting.

The work for this paper has received funding from European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 857622.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alvarez, R., Nagler, J.: Likely consequences of internet voting for political representation. Loyola Los Angeles Law Rev. 34, 1115–1153 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, C.J.: When in doubt, use proxies: attitudes toward domestic politics and support for European integration. Comp. Pol. Stud. 31(5), 569–601 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bartels, L.: Beyond the running tally: partisan bias in political perceptions. Polit. Behav. 24, 117–150 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Berinsky, A.J.: Assuming the costs of war: events, elites, and American public support for military conflict. J. Polit. 69(4), 975–997 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bisgaard, M., Slothuus, R.: Partisan elites as culprits? How party cues shape partisan perceptual gaps. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 62, 456–469 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bobadilla-Suarez, S., Love, B.: Fast or frugal, but not both: decision heuristics under time pressure. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 44(1), 24–33 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brader, T., Tucker, J.A.: Following the party’s lead: party cues, policy opinion, and the power of partisanship in three multiparty systems. Comp. Polit. 44(4), 403–420 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bullock, J.: Party cues. In: Suhay, E., Grofman, B., Trechsel, A.H. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Persuasion. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Campbell, A., Converse, P.E., Miller, W.E., Stokes, D.E.: The American Voter. Wiley, New York (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–340 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Delfi: Rahvaliit jätkab sõda e-hääletuse vastu (2006). https://www.delfi.ee/news/paevauudised/eesti/rahvaliit-jatkab-soda-e-haaletuse-vastu?id=13112352. Accessed 03 Nov 2019

  12. Ehret, P., Van Boven, L., Sherman, D.K.: Partisan barriers to bipartisanship: Understanding climate policy polarization. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 9(3), 308–318 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. ERR: Rüütel sai e-valimistega lüüa (2005). https://www.err.ee/435363/ruutel-sai-e-valimistega-luua. Accessed 03 Nov 2019

  14. ERR: EKRE vaidlustas e-valimiste korraldamise (2017). https://www.err.ee/617818/ekre-vaidlustas-e-valimiste-korraldamise. Accessed 03 Nov 2019

  15. ERR: It minister convenes inaugural e-voting working group (2019). https://news.err.ee/958188/it-minister-convenes-inaugural-e-voting-working-group. Accessed 03 Nov 2019

  16. ERR: Valimisteenistus EKRE-le: e-valimised on vaadeldavad ja kontrollitavad (2019). https://www.err.ee/921784/valimisteenistus-EKRE-le-e-valimised-on-vaadeldavad-ja-kontrollitavad. Accessed 03 Nov 2019

  17. Gigerenzer, G.: Rationality for Mortals: How People Cope with Uncertainty. Oxford University Press, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gigerenzer, G., Gaissmaier, W.: Heuristic decision making. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 62, 451–482 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hobolt, S.B.: Taking cues on Europe: voter competence and party endorsements in referendums on European integration. Eur. J. Polit. Res. 46(February), 151–182 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hooghe, L., Marks, G.: Calculation, community and cues: public opinion on European integration. Eur. Union Polit. 6(4), 419–443 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Information System Authority: ROCA Vulnerability and eID: Lessons Learned (2019). https://www.ria.ee/sites/default/files/content-editors/kuberturve/roca-vulnerability-and-eid-lessons-learned.pdf. Accessed 03 Nov 2019

  22. Jacoby, W.G.: The impact of party identification on issue attitudes. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 32, 643–61 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kersting, N., Baldersheim, H.: Electronic Voting and Democracy: A Comparative Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Keskerakond: E-riigis on suurepärane kõik peale e-valimiste (2015). https://www.keskerakond.ee/et/530-keskerakonna-volikogu-avaldus-e-riigis-on-suurepaerane-koik-peale-e-valimiste. Accessed 03 Nov 2019

  25. Latre, E., Thijssen, P., Perko, T.: The party politics of nuclear energy: party cues and public opinion regarding nuclear energy in Belgium. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 47, 192–201 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lippert, S.K., Davis, M.: A conceptual model integrating trust into planned change activities to enhance technology adoption behavior. J. Inf. Sci. 32(5), 434–448 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lippmann, W.: Public Opinion. Harcourt, Brace and Co. (1922)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H., Schoorman, F.D.: An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Manage. Rev. 20(3), 709–734 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. McKnight, D.H., Carter, M., Thatcher, J.B., Clay, P.F.: Trust in a specific technology: an investigation of its components and measures. ACM Trans. Manage. Inform. Syst. 2(2), 1–25 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. McKnight, D.H., Cummings, L.L., Chervany, N.L.: Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Acad. Manage. Rev. 23(3), 473–490 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pannico, R.: Parties are always right: the effects of party cues and policy information on attitudes towards EU issues. West Eur. Polit. 43(4), 869–893 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2019.1653658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Simon, H.A.: Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychol. Rev. 63(2), 129–138 (1956)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Solvak, M., Vassil, K.: E-voting in Estonia: technological diffusion and other developments over ten years (2005–2015). University of Tartu (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157), 1124–1131 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Vance, A., Elie-Dit-Cosaque, C., Straubl, D.W.: Examining trust in information technology artifacts: the effects of system quality and culture. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24(4), 73–100 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Vassil, K., Solvak, M., Vinkel, P., Trechsel, A.H., Alvarez, R.M.: The diffusion of internet voting. Usage patterns of internet voting in Estonia between 2005 and 2015. Govern. Inform. Q. 33(3), 453–459 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.06.007

  37. Veiserik, I.: Ando Leps: E-hääletus riigikogu valimistel õigustühine. Kesknädal (23 March) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27(3), 425–478 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Vester, L., Olup, N.M.: Ülevaade: Keskerakonna võitlused e-valimiste vastu. Postimees (5 September) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Villmann, A.-L.: Keskerakond nõuab Euroopa Parlamendilt e-valimiste tühistamist (2014). https://www.err.ee/512935/keskerakond-nouab-euroopa-parlamendilt-e-valimiste-tuhistamist. Accessed 03 Nov 2019

  41. Zaller, J.R.: The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Johan Skytte Institute of Political Studies, University of Tartu, Lossi 36, 51003, Tartu, Estonia

    Piret Ehin & Mihkel Solvak

Authors
  1. Piret Ehin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mihkel Solvak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Piret Ehin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia

    Robert Krimmer

  2. Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany

    Melanie Volkamer

  3. Kozminski University, Warsaw, Poland

    David Duenas-Cid

  4. University of Copenhagen, København, Denmark

    Oksana Kulyk

  5. University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg

    Peter Rønne

  6. University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia

    Mihkel Solvak

  7. University of Bath, Bath, UK

    Micha Germann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ehin, P., Solvak, M. (2021). Party Cues and Trust in Remote Internet Voting: Data from Estonia 2005–2019. In: Krimmer, R., et al. Electronic Voting. E-Vote-ID 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12900. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86942-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86942-7_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86941-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86942-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation