Skip to main content

Comparison Between Active and Passive Attention Using EEG Waves and Deep Neural Network

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Brain Informatics (BI 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 12960))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1815 Accesses

Abstract

A person’s state of attentiveness can be affected by various outside factors. Having energy, feeling tired, or even simply being distracted all play a role in someone’s level of attention. The task at hand can potentially affect the person’s attention or concentration level as well. In terms of students who take online courses, constantly watching lectures and conducting these courses solely online can cause lack of concentration or attention. Attention can be considered in two categories: passive or active. Conducting active and passive attention-based trials can reveal different states of attentiveness. This paper compares active and passive attention trial results of the two states, wide awake and tired. This has been done in order to uncover a difference in results between the two states. The data analyzed throughout this paper was collected from DSI 24 EEG equipment, and the generated EEG is processed through a 3D Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to produce results. Three passive attention trials and three active attention trials were performed on seven subjects, while they were wide awake and when they were tired. The experiments on the preprocessed data results in accuracies as high as 81.78% for passive attention detection accuracy and 63.67% for active attention detection accuracy, which shown a clear ability to separate between the two attention categories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hassan, R.: Human attention recognition with machine learning from brain-EEG signals. In: 2nd IEEE Eurasia Conference on Biomedical Engineering, Healthcare, and Sustainability (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alirezaei, M., Sardouie, S.H.: Detection of human attention using EEG signals. In: 24th National and 2nd International Iranican Conference on Biomedical Engineering, pp. 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang, P.: (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Liu, N.: (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shi, L., Ko, M.L., Ko, G.Y.P.: Retinoschisin facilitates the function of L-type voltage-gated calcium channels (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sezer, M.: Avârız Kayıtlarına Göre XVII. ve XVIII. Yüzyıllarda Karinabad Kazâsı (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. P: (2019). https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2019/09/study-shows-that-students-learn- more-when-taking-part-in-classrooms-that-employ-active-learning-strategies/Accessed

  8. Elsayed, N., Saad, Z., Bayoumi, M.: Brain computer interface: EEG signal preprocessing issues and solutions. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 169(3), 12–16 (2017). https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2017914621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Roy, Y.: Deep learning-based electroencephalography analysis: a systematic review. J. Nueral Eng.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Motomura, S., Tanaka, H., Nakamura, S.: Sequential attention-based detection of semantic incongruities from EEG while listening to speech. In: 42nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society, pp. 268–271 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Subramaniyam, N.: (2018). https://sapienlabs.org/pitfalls-of-filtering-the-eeg-signal/

  12. Arvaneh, M., Tanaka, T.: (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Delorme, A., Makeig, S.: EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single- trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J. Neurosci. Methods 134(1), 9–21 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Luazon, F.Q.: An introduction to deep learning. In: 11th International Conference on Informa- tion Sciences, Signal Processing and their Applications: Special Sessions (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gupgta, S., Singh, H.: Preprocessing EEG signals for direct human-system interface. In: Pro- ceedings IEEE International Joint Symposia on Intelligence and Systems (1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sumit Chakravarty .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

A GitHub repository has been created for the 3DCNN code and data used through- out this study. Please visit the following link to view: https://github.com/mkwarman/A ctive-Passive-Attention-3DCNN-Classification.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chakravarty, S., Xie, Y., Le, L., Johnson, J., Hales, M. (2021). Comparison Between Active and Passive Attention Using EEG Waves and Deep Neural Network. In: Mahmud, M., Kaiser, M.S., Vassanelli, S., Dai, Q., Zhong, N. (eds) Brain Informatics. BI 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12960. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86993-9_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86993-9_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86992-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86993-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics