Skip to main content

New Cohesion Policy 2021–2027: The Role of Indicators in the Assessment of the SDGs Targets Performance

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2021 (ICCSA 2021)

Abstract

The paper deals with the usefulness of indicators and indices in assessing the performance of a city or territory with respect to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and their targets, in the context of the new European cohesion policy 2021–2027. An impact matrix has been developed in order to measure the performance of each indicator in achieving the SDGs and their targets in a real case study: the municipality of Rivoli, located in Piedmont region, which is currently involved in the programming of European and National recovery funds. The proposed model on the one hand can support the decision-making process in the assessment and monitoring procedures and on the other hand it can be of interest of technicians and freelances to simplify and optimize the conventional planning procedures to present project proposals of territorial transformation and with respect to the building of strategies with medium and long perspective. In this sense, this first application can determine the usefulness of the method to assess in a simple way the wide range of potential impacts, considering both the quantitative and the qualitative scale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Elmqvist, T., Andersson, E., Frantzeskaki, N., et al.: Sustainability and resilience for transformation in the urban century. Nat. Sustain. 2, 267–273 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0250-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. United Nation: Transforming Our World Agenda Sustainable Development 2030 EngFreSpa AEL 151004 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. UNISDR: The Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030: the challenge for science. R Soc Meet Note. A/CONF.224/CRP.1 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. United Nations General Assembly: Seventy-First Session Agenda Item 20 Implementation of the Outcomes of the United Nations Conferences on Human Settlements And on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development and Strengthening of The United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat) Dr. 20637:32 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. IPCC: IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5°C (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. European Commission: Strategic Foresight Report 2020 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pillay, Y.P., Buschke, F.T.: Misaligned environmental governance indicators and the mismatch between government actions and positive environmental outcomes. Environ. Sci. Policy 112, 374–380 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.07.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gencer, E.A.: A Handbook for Local Government Leaders (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. UNISDR: Making Cities Resilient Report 2012 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Risk Reduction: Hyogo Framework for Action 2005–2015: Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. DIPCOE: La programmazione della politica di coesione 2021–2027 - Documento preparatorio per il confronto partenariale (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Utting, P.: Achieving the sustainable development goals through social and solidarity economy: incremental versus transformative change. In: Social Dimension of Sustainable development. UNRISD (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bottero, M., Mondini, G.: Valutazione e sostenibilità. Piani, programmi, progetti. CELID (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dell'Anna, F., Vergerio, G., Corgnati, S., Mondini, G.: A new price list for retrofit intervention evaluation on some archetypical buildings. Valori e Valutazioni 22, 3–17 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bottero, M., Caprioli, C., Cotella, G., Santangelo, M.: Sustainable cities: a reflection on potentialities and limits based on existing eco-districts in Europe. Sustainability (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Brambilla, A., Lindahl, G., Dell’Ovo, M., Capolongo, S.: Validation of a multiple criteria tool for healthcare facilities quality evaluation. Facilities 39, 434–447 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1108/F-06-2020-0070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. UNISDR: Hyogo framework for action 2005–2015. In: United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lal, P.N., Mitchell, T., Aldunce, P., et al.: National Systems for Managing the Risks from Climate Extremes and Disasters (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Appiotti, F., Assumma, V., Bottero, M., et al.: Definition of a risk assessment model within a European interoperable database platform (EID) for cultural heritage. J. Cult. Herit. 46, 268–277 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2020.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Saaty, R.W.: The analytic hierarchy process-what it is and how it is used. Math. Model. (1987). https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Barron, F.H., Barrett, B.E.: The efficacy of SMARTER—simple multi-attribute rating technique extended to ranking. Acta Psychol. (Amst) 93, 23–36 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(96)00010-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jesinghaus, J.: On the art of aggregating “apples & oranges”. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM), Milano (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Assumma, V., Bottero, M., De Angelis, E., et al.: A decision support system for territorial resilience assessment and planning: an application to the Douro Valley (Portugal). Sci. Total Environ. 756, 143806 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bottero, M., Datola, G., De Angelis, E.: A system dynamics model and analytic network process: an integrated approach to investigate urban resilience. Land 9, 242 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/land9080242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Parliament THEE, Council THE, The OF, Union E: Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 on the Assessment of the Effects of Certain Plans and Programmes on the Environment (OJ L 197 21.07.2001 p. 30). Doc Eur Community Environ Law 295–307 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511610851.021

  26. Assumma, V., Bottero, M., Datola, G., Pezzoli, A.: Climate Change and Urban Resilience. Preliminary Insights from an Integrated Evaluation Framework, pp. 1–10. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48279-4_63

  27. Bottero, M., Dell’Anna, F., Nappo, M.: Evaluating tangible and intangible aspects of cultural heritage: an application of the PROMETHEE method for the reuse project of the Ceva–Ormea railway. In: Green Energy and Technology, pp. 285–295 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yang, R.J.: An investigation of stakeholder analysis in urban development projects: empirical or rationalistic perspectives. Int. J. Proj. Manage. 32, 838–849 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.10.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giulia Datola .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Assumma, V., Datola, G., Mondini, G. (2021). New Cohesion Policy 2021–2027: The Role of Indicators in the Assessment of the SDGs Targets Performance. In: Gervasi, O., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2021. ICCSA 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12955. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87007-2_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87007-2_44

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-87006-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-87007-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics