Skip to main content

A Literature Review on the Assessment of Vitality and Its Theoretical Framework. Emerging Perspectives for Geodesign in the Urban Context

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2021 (ICCSA 2021)

Abstract

Vitality and Urbanity, as conditions for economic vibrancy and social diversity, are central objectives of policies for urban sustainable development. Vitality and urbanity are herein defined as distinctive urban qualities emerging from the combination of diverse practices, integrated into urban form and influencing the sense of place. The proposed study investigates the components of urban form that influence urbanity and vitality. A broad literature review on the formalization and operationalization of the concepts of urbanity and vitality is presented. The comparative analysis of selected articles investigates five aspects: i) conceptualization of urbanity and vitality; ii) identification of factors impacting urbanity and vitality; iii) definition of indicators and protocols; iv) co-relations among urban form factors and levels of vitality and urbanity and v) relevance and impact of investigated methodologies on planning processes. This study aims to define the theoretical foundation of a methodology that utilizes space syntax and spatial analysis techniques to address three issues related to sustainable urban development: clear representation of conditions of urbanity, understanding of criticalities and formulation of policies and strategies for reinforcing vibrant urban spaces. The proposed theoretical framework thus contributes to the application of the Geodesign paradigm to the urban realm by supporting the essential understanding of the spatial culture of a place.

This paper is the result of the joint work of the authors. ‘Abstract’ ‘Methodology’, ‘Results’ and ‘Definition of key aspects’ were written jointly by the authors. Alfonso Annunziata wrote the ‘Introduction’ and ‘Concepts and methods’. Chiara Garau wrote the ‘Discussion’ and ‘Conclusions’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carmona, M.: Place value: place quality and its impact on health, social, economic and environmental outcomes. J. Urban Des. 24, 1–48 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2018.1472523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gehl, J.: Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space. Island Press, Washington, D.C. (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hillier, B.: Space is the machine: a configurational theory of architecture. Space Syntax, University College of London, London, United Kingdom (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Whyte, W.H.: The social life of small urban spaces (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jacobs, J.: The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Vintage, New York (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lynch, K.: The Image of the City. MIT Press, Cambridge (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Conzen, M.R.G.: Alnwick, Northumberland: A Study in Town-Plan Analysis. Transactions and Papers (Institute of British Geographers), pp. iii–122 (1960). https://doi.org/10.2307/621094

  8. Ye, Y., Yeh, A., Zhuang, Y., van Nes, A., Liu, J.: “Form Syntax” as a contribution to geodesign: a morphological tool for urbanity-making in urban design. URBAN DESIGN Int. 22, 73–90 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-016-0035-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ye, Y., Van Nes, A.: Quantitative tools in urban morphology: combining space syntax, spacematrix and mixed-use index in a GIS framework. Urban Morphol. 18, 97–118 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Foster, K.: Geodesign parsed: placing it within the rubric of recognized design theories. Landsc. Urban Plan. 156, 92–100 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.06.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Steinitz, C.: A Framework for Geodesign: Changing Geography by Design. Esri, Redlands (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Secchi, B.: La città dei ricchi e la città dei poveri. Gius. Laterza & Figli Spa (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mumford, L.: What is a city. Archit. Rec. 82, 59–62 (1937)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Montgomery, J.: Making a city: urbanity, vitality and urban design. 3, 93–116 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809808724418

  15. Boudreau, J.-A.: Reflections on urbanity as an object of study and a critical epistemology. In: Critical Urban Studies: New Directions, p. 55 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Garau, C., Annunziata, A., Yamu, C.: The multi-method tool ‘PAST’ for evaluating cultural routes in historical cities: evidence from Cagliari, Italy. Sustainability 12 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145513

  17. McCunn, L.J., Gifford, R.: Spatial navigation and place imageability in sense of place. Cities 74, 208–218 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shamai, S.: Sense of place: an empirical measurement. Geoforum 22, 347–358 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7185(91)90017-K

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ye, Y., Li, D., Liu, X.: How block density and typology affect urban vitality: an exploratory analysis in Shenzhen, China 39, 631–652 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2017.1381536

  20. Zumelzu, A., Barrientos-Trinanes, M.: Analysis of the effects of urban form on neighborhood vitality: five cases in Valdivia, Southern Chile. J. Hous. Built Environ. 34(3), 897–925 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-019-09694-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tang, L., et al.: Exploring the influence of urban form on urban vibrancy in Shenzhen based on mobile phone data. Sustainability 10 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124565

  22. Annunziata, A.: Spazi urbani praticabili. FrancoAngeli (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Garau, C., Annunziata, A., Yamu, C.: A walkability assessment tool coupling multi-criteria analysis and space syntax: the case study of Iglesias, Italy. Eur. Plan. Stud. 1–23 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1761947

  24. Li, S., Wu, C., Lin, Y., Li, Z., Du, Q.: Urban morphology promotes urban vibrancy from the spatiotemporal and synergetic perspectives: a case study using multisource data in Shenzhen, China. Sustainability 12 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124829

  25. Chan, J.: Urban Ethics in the Anthropocene The Moral Dimensions of Six Emerging Conditions in Contemporary Urbanism. Palgrave Macmillan, London (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Connolly, J.J.T.: From Jacobs to the just city: a foundation for challenging the green planning orthodoxy. Cities 91, 64–70 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.05.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hillier, B., Penn, A., Hanson, J., Grajewski, T., Xu, J.: Natural movement: or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environ. Plann. B Plann. Des. 20, 29–66 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1068/b200029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yamu, C., Van Nes, A.: an integrated modeling approach combining multifractal urban planning with a space syntax perspective. Urban Sci. 1 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci1040037

  29. Hidayati, I., Yamu, C., Tan, W.: The emergence of mobility inequality in greater jakarta, indonesia: a socio-spatial analysis of path dependencies in transport-land use policies. Sustainability. 11, 5115 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hillier, B., Burdett, R., Peponis, J., Penn, A.: Creating life: or, does architecture determine anything? Archit. Comport./Archit. Behav. 3, 233–250 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Yamu, C.: It is simply complex(ity). disP – Plan. Rev. 50, 43–53 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2014.1007662

  32. Liu, S., Zhang, L., Long, Y., Long, Y., Xu, M.: A new urban vitality analysis and evaluation framework based on human activity modeling using multi-source big data. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 9 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9110617

  33. Meng, Y., Xing, H.: Exploring the relationship between landscape characteristics and urban vibrancy: a case study using morphology and review data. Cities 95, 102389 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Yue, W., Chen, Y., Zhang, Q., Liu, Y.: Spatial explicit assessment of urban vitality using multi-source data: a case of Shanghai, China. Sustainability 11 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030638

  35. Fuentes, L., Miralles-Guasch, C., Truffello, R., Delclòs-Alió, X., Flores, M., Rodríguez, S.: Santiago de Chile through the Eyes of Jane Jacobs. Analysis of the conditions for urban vitality in a Latin American Metropolis. Land 9 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/land9120498

  36. Delclòs-Alió, X., Miralles-Guasch, C.: Looking at Barcelona through Jane Jacobs’s eyes: mapping the basic conditions for urban vitality in a Mediterranean conurbation. Land Use Policy 75, 505–517 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.04.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Jacobs-Crisioni, C., Rietveld, P., Koomen, E., Tranos, E.: Evaluating the impact of land-use density and mix on spatiotemporal urban activity patterns: an exploratory study using mobile phone data. Environ. Plan. A 46, 2769–2785 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1068/a130309p

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zeng, C., Song, Y., He, Q., Shen, F.: Spatially explicit assessment on urban vitality: case studies in Chicago and Wuhan. Sustain. Urban Areas 40, 296–306 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.04.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lu, S., Huang, Y., Shi, C., Yang, X.: Exploring the associations between urban form and neighborhood vibrancy: a case study of Chengdu, China. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 8 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8040165

  40. Lu, S., Shi, C., Yang, X.: Impacts of built environment on urban vitality: regression analyses of Beijing and Chengdu, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16234592

  41. Sulis, P., Manley, E., Zhong, C., Batty, M.: Using mobility data as proxy for measuring urban vitality. J. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2018, 137–162 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang, A., Xia, C., Chu, J., Lin, J., Li, W., Wu, J.: Portraying urban landscape: a quantitative analysis system applied in fifteen metropolises in China. Sustain. Urban Areas 46, 101396 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.12.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Kim, S.: Urban vitality, urban form, and land use: their relations within a geographical boundary for walkers. Sustainability 12 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410633

  44. Niklas, U., von Behren, S., Soylu, T., Kopp, J., Chlond, B., Vortisch, P.: Spatial factor—using a random forest classification model to measure an internationally comparable urbanity index. Urban Sci. 4 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci4030036

  45. Zhong, T., Lü, G., Zhong, X., Tang, H., Ye, Y.: Measuring human-scale living convenience through multi-sourced urban data and a geodesign approach: buildings as analytical units. Sustainability 12 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114712

  46. Yue, W., Chen, Y., Thy, P.T.M., Fan, P., Liu, Y., Zhang, W.: Identifying urban vitality in metropolitan areas of developing countries from a comparative perspective: Ho Chi Minh City versus Shanghai. Sustain. Urban Areas 65, 102609 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Yamu, C., van Nes, A., Garau, C.: Bill Hillier’s legacy: space syntax—a synopsis of basic concepts, measures, and empirical application. Sustainability 13, 1–25 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Garau, C., Annunziata, A.: Supporting children’s independent activities in smart and playable public places. Sustainability 12, 8352 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Vaughan, L.: The spatial syntax of urban segregation. Prog. Plan. 67, 205–294 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2007.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Caglioni, M., Campagna, M.: Geodesign for collaborative spatial planning: three case studies at different scales. In: Garbolino, E., Voiron-Canicio, C. (eds.) Ecosystem and Territorial Resilience, pp. 323–345. Elsevier (2021). Chapter 12. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818215-4.00012-2

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the project “Space Syntax and Multicriteria Analysis for the Measurement of Walkability in the Build Environment”, founded by the programme “Bando 2019 Mobilità Giovani Ricercatori (MGR)”, financed by the Autonomous Region of Sardinia (under the Regional Law of 7 August 2007, n. 7 “Promotion of Scientific Research and Technological Innovation in Sardinia”). This study was also supported by the MIUR) through the project “WEAKI TRANSIT: WEAK-demand areas Innovative TRANsport Shared services for Italian Towns (Project protocol: 20174ARRHT_004; CUP Code: F74I19001290001), financed with the PRIN 2017 (Research Projects of National Relevance) programme. We authorize the MIUR to reproduce and distribute reprints for Governmental purposes, notwithstanding any copyright notations thereon. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the MIUR.

This study was also supported by the project ‘Investigating the relationships between knowledge-building and design and decision-making in spatial planning with geodesign’, founded by the Foundation of Sardinia and Autonomous Region of Sardinia (Fondazione di Sardegna – Convenzione triennale tra la Fondazione di Sardegna e gli Atenei Sardi Regione Sardegna 2018).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chiara Garau .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Annunziata, A., Garau, C. (2021). A Literature Review on the Assessment of Vitality and Its Theoretical Framework. Emerging Perspectives for Geodesign in the Urban Context. In: Gervasi, O., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2021. ICCSA 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12958. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87016-4_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87016-4_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-87015-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-87016-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics