Skip to main content

Urban Accessibility and Social Equity in Covid-19 Era: A Spatial Analysis in Two Neighbourhoods of the City of Naples

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2021 (ICCSA 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 12958))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The academic debate has been turn the attention on pedestrian accessibility to urban services, as walking allow to solve several issues ranging from social and health problems also accentuated by the ongoing pandemic. The innovation in geospatial field has encouraged the development of accessibility and walkability measures and indicators oriented to measure the main physical and functional characteristics of the built environment related to the accessibility of urban services at the neighbourhood scale. According to these premises, this research work, aimed at improving pedestrian accessibility and guaranteeing equal access to neighbourhood-scale services, proposes a seven-steps GIS method based on an Accessibility Indicator that integrates the main aspects of walkability indexes relating to connectivity, sense of security, geometry and amenity of urban built environment. This Accessibility Indicator defines the areas of easy accessibility to the local essential services, by referring to two different maximum distances: the first relates to the distance of 700 m defined in the literature as the distance that a user is willing to walk to use a neighborhood service and the second relates to the regulatory restrictions adopted in the most difficult periods of the pandemic (500 m).

Despite being a joint study, Carmela Gargiulo elaborated Sect. 3, Federica Gaglione Sect. 2 and Floriana Zucaro Sect. 1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. WHO News. https://www.unscn.org/en/news-events/. Accessed 21 Jan 2021

  2. Frank, L.D., Andresen, M.A., Schmid, T.L.: Obesity relationships with community design, physical activity, and time spent in cars. Am. J. Prev. Med. 27(2), 87–96 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. ISCA News. https://inactivity-time-bomb.nowwemove.com/. Accessed 10 Jan 2021

  4. Ding, D., Kolbe-Alexander, T., Nguyen, B., Katzmarzyk, P.T., Pratt, M., Lawson, K.D.: The economic burden of physical inactivity: a systematic review and critical appraisal. Br. J. Sports Med. 51(19), 1392–1409 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Donati A., Petracchini F., Gasparini C. Tomassetti L.: Mobilitaria 2019 - Politiche di mobilità e qualità dell’aria nelle 14 città e aree metropolitane 2017–2018

    Google Scholar 

  6. Battarra, R., Gargiulo, C., Tremiterra, M.R., Zucaro, F.: Smart mobility in Italian metropolitan cities: a comparative analysis through indicators and actions. Sustain. Urban Areas 41, 556–567 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Battarra, R., Zucaro, F., Tremiterra, M.R.: Smart mobility: an evaluation method to audit Italian cities. In: 5th IEEE International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS), pp. 421–426 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pinna, F., Masala, F., Garau, C.: Urban policies and mobility trends in Italian smart cities. Sustainability 9(4), 494 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gargiulo, C., Zucaro, F., Gaglione, F.: A set of variables for the elderly accessibility in urban areas. TeMA - Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 53–66 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Carpentieri, G., Guida, C., Masoumi, E.H.: Measuring multimodal accessibility to urban services for elderly. An application at primary health services in the city of Naples. In: Gargiulo, C., Zoppi, C., (eds.) Planning, Nature and Ecosystem Services, pp. 810–825 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cottrill, C., Gaglione, F., Gargiulo, C., Zucaro, F.: Defining the characteristics of walking paths to promote an active ageing. In: Pedestrians, Urban Spaces and Health: Proceedings of the XXIV International Conference on Living and Walking in Cities, pp. 209–213 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rossetti, S., Zazzi, M.: In field assessment of existing pedestrian paths: a comprehensive approach towards pedestrian oriented neighbourhoods. In: Pedestrians, Urban Spaces and Health: Proceedings of the XXIV International Conference on Living and Walking in Cities, pp. 88–92 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  13. UN Publications. https://www.un.org.com. Accessed 29 Dec 2020

  14. WHO Publications. https://www.who.org.com. Accessed 20 Feb 2021

  15. Southworth, M.: Designing the walkable city. J. Urban Plann. Dev. 131(4), 246–257 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cervero, R., Kockelman, D.: Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity, and design. Transp. Res. Part D 2(3), 199–219 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ewing, R., Cervero, R.: Travel and the built environment: a meta-analysis. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 76(3), 265–294 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Garau, C., Annunziata, A., Yamu, C.: A walkability assessment tool coupling multi-criteria analysis and space syntax: the case study of Iglesias, Italy. Eur. Plann. Stud. 1–23 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Motamed, B., Bitaraf, A.: An empirical assessment of the walking environment in a megacity: case study of Valiasr Street, Tehran. Archnet-IJAR: Int. J. Architectural Res. 10(3), 76–99 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kim, S.: Assessing mobility in an aging society: environmental factors associated with older people’s subjective transportation deficiency in the US. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 14(5), 422–429 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cutts, B.B., et al.: City structure, obesity, and environmental justice: an integrated analysis of physical and social barriers to walkable streets and park access. Soc. Sci. Med. 69(9), 1314–1322 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Boulange, C., Pettit, C., Giles-Corti, B.: The walkability planning support system: an evidence-based tool to design healthy communities. In: Geertman, S., Allan, A., Pettit, C., Stillwell, J. (eds.) CUPUM 2017. LNGC, pp. 153–165. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57819-4_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Su, S., Zhou, H., Xu, M., Ru, H., Wang, W., Weng, M.: Auditing street walkability and associated social inequalities for planning implications. J. Transp. Geogr. 74, 62–76 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yamu, C., Van Nes, A.: An integrated modeling approach combining multifractal urban planning with a space syntax perspective. Urban Sci. 1, 37 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Vale, D.S., Saraiva, M., Pereira, M.: Active accessibility: a review of operational measures of walking and cycling accessibility. J. Transp. Land Use 9, 209–235 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Frank, L.D., Sallis, J.F., Conway, T.L., Chapman, J.E., Saelens, B.E., Bachman, W.: Many pathways from land use to health: associations between neighborhood walkability and active transportation, body mass index, and air quality. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 72(1), 75–87 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Frank L.D., et al.: The development of a walkability index: application to the neighborhood quality of life study. Brit. J. Sports Med. 44(13), 924–933 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Grasser, G., Van Dyck, D., Titze, S., Stronegger, W.: Objectively measured walkability and active transport and weight-related outcomes in adults: a systematic review. Int. J. Public Health 58, 615–625 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Buck, C., Pohlabeln, H., Huybrechts, I., et al.: Development and application of a moveability index to quantify possibilities for physical activity in the built environment of children. Health Place 17, 1191–1201 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Buck, C., et al.: Objective measures of the built environment and physical activity in children: from walkability to moveability. J. Urban Health 92(1), 24–38 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kim, H.J., Heinrich, K.M.: Built environment factors influencing walking to school behaviors: a comparison between a small and large US city. Front. Public Health 4, 77 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Frank, L.D., Appleyard, B.S., Ulmer, J.M., Chapmanm, J.E., Fox, E.H.: Comparing walkability methods: creation of street smart walk score and efficacy of a code-based 3D walkability index. J. Transp. Health 21, 101005 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kuzmyak, J.R., Baber, C., Savory, D.: Use of walk opportunities index to quantify local accessibility. Transp. Res. Rec. 1977(1), 145–153 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Peiravian, F., Derrible, S., Ijaz, F.: Development and application of the pedestrian environment index (PEI). J. Transp. Geogr. 39, 73–84 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Duncan, G.E., et al.: Genetic and environmental influences on residential location in the US. Health Place 18(3), 515–519 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Witten, K., et al.: Neighborhood built environment and transport and leisure physical activity: Findings using objective exposure and outcome measures in New Zealand. Environ. Health Perspect. 120, 971–977 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Gargiulo, C., Sforza, A., Sterle, C., Zucaro, F.: An optimization model fitting the neighborhood sustainability assessment tools. Sustainability 10(10), 3365 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Blečić, I., Congiu, T., Fancello, G., Trunfio, G.A.: Planning and design support tools for walkability: a guide for urban analysts. Sustainability 12(11), 4405 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Gaglione, F., Gargiulo, C., Zucaro, F. Elders’ quality of life. A method to optimize pedestrian accessibility to urban services. TeMA – J. Land Use Mobility Environ. 12(3), 295–312 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Gaglione, F., Cottrill, C., Gargiulo, C.: Urban services, pedestrian networks and behaviors to measure elderly accessibility. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 90, 102687 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Federica Gaglione .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gargiulo, C., Gaglione, F., Zucaro, F. (2021). Urban Accessibility and Social Equity in Covid-19 Era: A Spatial Analysis in Two Neighbourhoods of the City of Naples. In: Gervasi, O., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2021. ICCSA 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12958. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87016-4_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87016-4_37

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-87015-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-87016-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics