Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Literature Review on Urban Usability and Accessibility to Investigate the Related Criteria for Equality in the City

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2021 (ICCSA 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 12958))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The environmental issues and, in recent years, the Covid-19 pandemic determined an increasing consensus around the need for urban policies aimed at re-shaping the urban realm. The issue of equality and the related conditions of accessibility and usability emerge as critical requirements in the re-shaping of the urban landscape and mobility. As a consequence, the proposed article discusses a comprehensive literature review on the topics of usability and accessibility and of the complementary notions of disability and exclusion. The objectives of the literature review are to define a taxonomy of the different dimensions of usability and accessibility, to assess the relevance of the different forms of usability and accessibility across disciplinary fields related to urban and transportation studies, to identify the co-relations among specific aspects of urbanity and mobility and conditions of accessibility and usability. The proposed literature review is the preliminary stage of a study aimed at defining a methodological framework for quantitatively describing the urban environment in terms of its accessibility and usability. The proposed defines the theoretical framework of an analysis method for evaluating inequality incorporated into the urban environment and for facilitating smart decisions and holistic design in the context of urban planning.

This paper is the result of the joint work of the authors. ‘Abstract’ ‘Methodology’ and ‘Results’ with its subparagraphs were written jointly by all authors. Francesco Pinna wrote the ‘Introduction’, Chiara Garau wrote ‘Discussion and Conclusions’ and Alfonso Annunziata the ‘Theoretical framework’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Garau, C., Annunziata, A.: Supporting children’s independent activities in smart and playable public places. Sustainability 12, 8352 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Low, S., Smart, A.: Thoughts about public space during Covid-19 Pandemic. City Soc (Wash). 32 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1111/ciso.12260

  3. Lai, K.Y., Webster, C., Kumari, S., Sarkar, C.: The nature of cities and the covid-19 pandemic. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 46, 27–31 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2020.08.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Annunziata, A.: Spazi urbani praticabili. Franco Angeli, Milano (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Annunziata, A., Garau, C.: A literature review on walkability and its theoretical framework. emerging perspectives for research developments. In: Gervasi, O., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2020. LNCS, vol. 12255, pp. 422–437. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58820-5_32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Chan, J.: Urban Ethics in the Anthropocene. The Moral Dimensions of Six Emerging Conditions in Contemporary Urbanism. Palgrave Macmillan, London (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Barrett, B.F., Horne, R., Fien, J.: The ethical city: a rationale for an urgent new urban agenda. Sustainability 8, 1197 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ignatieff, M.: The Ordinary Virtues. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2017)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Jacobs, J.: The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Vintage Books, New York (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fainstein, S.S.: The just city. Int. J. Urban Sci. 18, 1–18 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2013.834643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lefebvre, H.: The Right to the City, Writings on Cities. Trans. Eleonore Kofman and Elizabeth Lebas. Blackwell, Oxford (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pinna, F., Garau, C., Maltinti, F., Coni, M.: Beyond architectural barriers: building a bridge between disability and universal design. In: Gervasi, O., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2020. LNCS, vol. 12255, pp. 706–721. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58820-5_51

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Garau, C., Annunziata, A., Yamu, C.: A walkability assessment tool coupling multi-criteria analysis and space syntax: the case study of Iglesias, Italy. Eur. Plann. Stud. 1–23 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1761947

  14. Sennett, R.: Costruire e abitare. Etica per la città. Milano: Feltrinelli (ed. or, 2018, Building and Dwelling. Ethics for the City. London: Penguin Books) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Secchi, B.: La città dei ricchi e la città dei poveri. Editori Laterza, Bari, Italy (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Geurs, K.T., van Wee, B.: Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions. J. Transp. Geogr. 12, 127–140 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Meshur, H.F.A,: Evaluation of urban spaces from the perspective of universal design principles: the case of Konya/Turkey. TeMA. 9, 191-208 (2016). https://doi.org/10.6092/1970-9870/3786

  18. Larkin, H., Hitch, D., Watchorn, V., Ang, S.: Working with policy and regulatory factors to implement universal design in the built environment: The Australian experience. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 12, 8157–8171 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120708157.

  19. Canale, A., Campisi, T., Tesoriere, G., Sanfilippo, L., Brignone, A.: The evaluation of home-school itineraries to improve accessibility of a university campus trough sustainable transport modes. In: Gervasi, O., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2020. LNCS, vol. 12250, pp. 754–769. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58802-1_54

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Leonardi, S., Tesoriere, G., Distefano, N., Pulvirenti, G., Canale, A., Campisi, T.: Crossing conditions and kerb delay assessment for better safety and accessibility of road pedestrian crossings at urban intersections. In: La Rosa, D., Privitera, R. (eds.) INPUT 2021. LNCE, vol. 146, pp. 623–632. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68824-0_66

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Silver, H.: Social exclusion. In: The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Studies, pp. 1–6. American Cancer Society (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118568446.eurs0486

  22. Allen, J., Farber, S.: Sizing up transport poverty: a national scale accounting of low-income households suffering from inaccessibility in Canada, and what to do about it. Transp. Policy 74, 214–223 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.11.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Padilla, C.M., Kihal-Talantikit, W., Perez, S., Deguen, S.: Use of geographic indicators of healthcare, environment and socioeconomic factors to characterize environmental health disparities. Environ. Health 15, 79 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-016-0163-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Reddick, C.G., Enriquez, R., Harris, R.J., Sharma, B.: Determinants of broadband access and affordability: an analysis of a community survey on the digital divide. Cities 106, 102904 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Borowczyk, J.: Sustainable urban development: spatial analyses as novel tools for planning a universally designed city. Sustainability. 10, 1407 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051407.

  26. Bredewold, F., Haarsma, A., Tonkens, E., Jager, M.: Convivial encounters: conditions for the urban social inclusion of people with intellectual and psychiatric disabilities. Urban Stud. 57, 2047–2063 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019869838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bates, C.: Conviviality, disability and design in the city. Sociol. Rev. 66, 984–999 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026118771291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Leonardi, M., Bickenbach, J., Ustun, T.B., Kostanjsek, N., Chatterji, S.: The definition of disability: what is in a name? Lancet 368, 1219–1221 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69498-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Connolly, J.J.T.: From Jacobs to the just city: a foundation for challenging the green planning orthodoxy. Cities 91, 64–70 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.05.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yılmaz, M.: Public Space and Accessibility. ICONARP. 6, 1–14 (2018). https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2018.46

  31. Jenkins, G.R., Yuen, H.K., Vogtle, L.K.: Experience of multisensory environments in public space among people with visual impairment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 12, 8644–8657 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120808644

  32. Sungur, A., Czaplinska, P.: Designing Playgrounds for All. Megaron. 13, (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Labbé, D., Mahmood, A., Miller, W.C., Mortenson, W.B.: Examining the impact of knowledge mobilization strategies to inform urban stakeholders on accessibility: a mixed-methods study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 17, 1561 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051561

  34. Auger, C., et al.: Mobile applications for participation at the shopping mall: content analysis and usability for persons with physical disabilities and communication or cognitive limitations. Int. J. Env. Res. Public Health. 11, 12777–12794 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph111212777

  35. Riddlesden, D., Singleton, A.D.: Broadband speed equity: a new digital divide? Appl. Geogr. 52, 25–33 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.04.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Melis, G., Gelormino, E., Marra, G., Ferracin, E., Costa, G.: The effects of the urban built environment on mental health: a cohort study in a large Northern Italian City. Int. J. Env. Res. Public Health 12, 250 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph121114898

  37. Ngom, R., Gosselin, P., Blais, C.: Reduction of disparities in access to green spaces: their geographic insertion and recreational functions matter. Appl. Geogr. 66, 35–51 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Bambra, C., et al.: Healthy land? An examination of the area-level association between brownfield land and morbidity and mortality in England. Environ Plan A. 46, 433–454 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1068/a46105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hamidi, S., Ewing, R., Tatalovich, Z., Grace, J.B., Berrigan, D.: Associations between urban sprawl and life expectancy in the United States. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 15, 861 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15050861

  40. Ferguson, M., Roberts, H.E., McEachan, R.R.C., Dallimer, M.: Contrasting distributions of urban green infrastructure across social and ethno-racial groups. Landsc. Urban Plan. 175, 136–148 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.03.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Baró, F., Calderón-Argelich, A., Langemeyer, J., Connolly, J.J.T.: Under one canopy? Assessing the distributional environmental justice implications of street tree benefits in Barcelona. Environ. Sci. Policy 102, 54–64 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.08.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Mears, M., Brindley, P., Maheswaran, R., Jorgensen, A.: Understanding the socioeconomic equity of publicly accessible greenspace distribution: the example of Sheffield, UK. Geoforum 103, 126–137 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.04.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Crouse, D.L., et al.: Urban greenness and mortality in Canada’s largest cities: a national cohort study. Lancet Planet. Health 1, e289–e297 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30118-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Yao, L., Liu, J., Wang, R., Yin, K., Han, B.: Effective green equivalent—A measure of public green spaces for cities. Ecol. Ind. 47, 123–127 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.07.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. De Sousa Silva, C., Viegas, I., Panagopoulos, Τ., Bell, S.: Environmental justice in accessibility to green infrastructure in two European cities. Land 7, 134 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/land7040134

  46. Garau, C., Annunziata, A.: Smart city governance and children’s agency: an assessment of the green infrastructure impact on children’s activities in Cagliari (Italy) with the tool “opportunities for children in urban spaces (OCUS).” Sustainability 11, 4848 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Reid, W.V.: Millennium ecosystem assessment (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Anguelovski, I., Connolly, J.J., Garcia-Lamarca, M., Cole, H., Pearsall, H.: New scholarly pathways on green gentrification: what does the urban ‘green turn’ mean and where is it going? Prog. Hum. Geogr. 43, 1064–1086 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132518803799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Talen, E., Menozzi, S., Schaefer, C.: What is a “great neighborhood”? An analysis of APA’s top-rated places. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 81, 121–141 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2015.1067573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Hillier, B., Hanson, J.: The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1984). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597237

  51. Hillier, B.: Space is the Machine: a Configurational Theory of Architecture. Space Syntax. University College of London, London (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Scorza, F., Fortunato, G., Carbone, R., Murgante, B., Pontrandolfi, P.: Increasing Urban walkability through citizens’ participation processes. Sustainability 13, 5835 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115835

  53. Scorza, F., Fortunato, G.: Cyclable cities: building feasible scenario through urban space-morphology assessment. J. Urban Plann. Dev. 147(4), 05021039 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Yamu, C., van Nes, A., Garau, C.: Bill Hillier’s legacy: space syntax—a synopsis of basic concepts, measures, and empirical application. Sustainability 13, 1–25 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Garau, C., Annunziata, A., Yamu, C.: The multi-method tool ‘PAST’ for evaluating cultural routes in historical cities: evidence from Cagliari, Italy. Sustainability. 12, (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145513

  56. Hidayati, I., Yamu, C., Tan, W.: The emergence of mobility inequality in greater Jakarta, Indonesia: a socio-spatial analysis of path dependencies in transport-land use policies. Sustainability 11, 5115 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Kyttä, M., Oliver, M., Ikeda, E., Ahmadi, E., Omiya, I., Laatikainen, T.: Children as urbanites: mapping the affordances and behavior settings of urban environments for Finnish and Japanese children. Children’s Geographies. 16, 319–332 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2018.1453923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Heft, H.: Affordances and the perception of landscape. Innov. Approaches Res. Landscape Health Open Space People Space 2, 9–32 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Chemero, A.: An outline of a theory of affordances. Ecol. Psychol. 15, 181–195 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326969ECO1502_5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Heft, H.: Affordances of children’s environments: A functional approach to environmental description. Children’s Environments Quarterly, 29–37 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Sen, A.: Capability and well-being. In: The Quality of Life, pp. 30–54. Oxford University Press, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the MIUR through the project “WEAKI TRANSIT: WEAK-demand areas Innovative TRANsport Shared services for Italian Towns (Project protocol: 20174ARRHT_004; CUP Code: F74I19001290001), financed with the PRIN 2017 (Research Projects of National Relevance) programme. We authorize the MIUR to reproduce and distribute reprints for Governmental purposes, notwithstanding any copyright notations thereon. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the MIUR. This study was developed within the Interdepartmental Center of the University of Cagliari “Cagliari Accessibility Lab”. This study was also supported by a project founded by the Foundation of Sardinia and Autonomous Region of Sardinia (Fondazione di Sardegna): ‘Investigating the relationships between knowledge-building and design and decision-making in spatial planning with geodesign’, (Convenzione triennale tra la Fondazione di Sardegna e gli Atenei Sardi Regione Sardegna 2018).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Architecture, University of Cagliari, 09129, Cagliari, Italy

    Francesco Pinna, Chiara Garau & Alfonso Annunziata

Authors
  1. Francesco Pinna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chiara Garau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alfonso Annunziata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chiara Garau .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy

    Osvaldo Gervasi

  2. University of Basilicata, Potenza, Potenza, Italy

    Beniamino Murgante

  3. Covenant University, Ota, Nigeria

    Sanjay Misra

  4. University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy

    Chiara Garau

  5. University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy

    Ivan Blečić

  6. Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia

    David Taniar

  7. Kyushu Sangyo University, Fukuoka, Japan

    Bernady O. Apduhan

  8. University of Minho, Braga, Portugal

    Ana Maria A. C. Rocha

  9. Polytechnic University of Bari, Bari, Italy

    Eufemia Tarantino

  10. Polytechnic University of Bari, Bari, Italy

    Carmelo Maria Torre

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pinna, F., Garau, C., Annunziata, A. (2021). A Literature Review on Urban Usability and Accessibility to Investigate the Related Criteria for Equality in the City. In: Gervasi, O., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2021. ICCSA 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12958. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87016-4_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87016-4_38

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-87015-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-87016-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation