Skip to main content

Urban Accessibility to Healthcare Facilities for the Elderly: Evolution of the Time-Based 2SFCA Methodology for the Nice Case Study (France)

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2021 (ICCSA 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 12958))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This study proposes a GIS-based methodology to measure accessibility to urban services, from the elderly perspective to support urban planning processes. In the light of a significant demographic change, policymakers should promote age-friendly urban planning approaches in order to guarantee equal opportunities to access to services and activities. We developed a methodology to measure accessibility to healthcare provision services, which considers urban characteristics and mobility features, as well as behavioral traits of older adults. The method belongs to the family of 2SFCA (Two-Steps Floating Catchment Area), which evaluates accessibility as the combination of both supply and demand of urban services; thus, we introduce innovative elements to shape actual mobility opportunities for the elderly and their travel choices within three different timeslots. The methodology was applied to the city of Nice (France), to measure accessibility to proximity services managed by Healthcare Regional Agency (l’Agence Régionale de Santé – ARS) of Provence, Alpes and Côte d’Azur. The outputs allow to quantify elderly people accessibility to primary health services and the application to the French case study has shown that the methodology could be effective to identify critical issues to support urban planning process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. European Commission: Green Paper on Ageing. Fostering solidarity and responsibil-ity between generations. European Commission, Brussells (2021). https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/1_en_act_part1_v8_0.pdf

  2. Eurostat: Ageing Europe — 2019 edition. Eurostat, Brussels (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ilinca, S., Rodrigues, R., Schmidt, A., Zólymi, E.: Gender and social class inequali-ties in active ageing: policy meets theory. European Centre for Social Welfare Policy and Research, Wien (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sadana, R., Blas, E., Budhwani, S., Koller, T., Paraje, G.: Healthy ageing: raising awareness of inequalities, determinants, and what could be done to improve health equity. Gerontologist 56(Suppl_2), 178–193 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Melo, L.A.D., Ferreira, L.M.D.B.M., Santos, M.M.D., Lima, K.C.D.: Socioeco-nomic, regional and demographic factors related to population ageing. Revista Bra-sileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia 20(4), 493–501 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mouratidis, K.: Compact city, urban sprawl, and subjective well-being. Cities 92, 261–272 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tijeras, E., González-García, L., Postigo, S.: The relationship between social support, basic psychological needs satisfaction and well-being in elderly adults. Europ. J. Health Res. 6(2), 133–143 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sazali, M.F., Zainol, H., Ab Dulhamid, H., Yetti, A.E.: Urban green open space as a health resilience catalyst for the elderly. Environ. Behav. Proc. J. 6(16) (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yamada, T., Chen, C.C., Murata, C., Hirai, H., Ojima, T., Kondo, K.: Access disparity and health inequality of the elderly: unmet needs and delayed healthcare. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 12(2), 1745–1772 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Guida, C., Caglioni, M.: Urban accessibility: the paradox, the paradigms and the measures. A scientific review. TeMA – J. Land Use Mobility Environ. 13(2), 149–168 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rossetti, S.: Planning for Accessibility and Safety. Theoretical Framework and Research Methodologies to Address People Friendly Mobility, Maggioli, Rimini (2020), ISBN 978-88-916-4311-7

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bhat, C., Handy, S., Kockelman, K., Mahmassani, H., Chen, Q., Weston, L.: Accessibility measures: formulation considerations and current applications. University of Texas at Austin, Center for Transportation Research (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Banister, D.: Transport for all. Transp. Rev. 39(3), 289–292 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Silva, C., Bertolini, L., te Brömmelstroet, M., Milakis, D., Papa, E.: Accessibility instruments in planning practice: bridging the implementation gap. Transp. Policy 53, 135–145 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. United Nations: Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Devel-opment. United Nations, New York (2015). http://bit.ly/TransformAgendaSDG-pd

  16. Ko-Wan, T., Yu-Ting, H., Yao-Lin, C.: An accessibility-based integrated measure of relative spatial equity in urban public facilities. Cities 22, 424–435 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Baudet-Michel, S., Chouraqui, J., Conti, B., Guiraud, N., Le Neindre, C., Toutin, G.: The shrinkage of justice and hospital facilities in small French cities (200–2016). Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 1(23) (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Geurs, K.T., Van Wee, B.: Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strat-egies: review and research directions. J. Transp. Geography 12(2), 127–140 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cui, M., Levinson, D.: Full cost accessibility. J. Transport Land Use 11(1), 661–679 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cui, M., Levinson, D.: Full cost accessibility. J. Transport Land Use 11(1), 661–679 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Geurs, K.T., Van Wee, B.: Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions. J. Transp. Geogr. 12(2), 127–140 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Farrington, J., Farrington, C.: Rural accessibility, social inclusion and social justice: towards conceptualisation. J. Transp. Geogr. 13(1), 1–12 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Scheurer, J., Curtis, C.: Accessibility Measures: Overview and Practical Applications. Impacts of Transit Led Development in a New Rail Corridor, Working Paper No. 4 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Luo, W., Wang, F.: Measures of spatial accessibility to health care in a GIS environment: synthesis and a case study in the Chicago region. Environ. Plann. B. Plann. Des. 30(6), 865–884 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Guo, S., et al.: Accessibility to urban parks for elderly residents: perspectives from mobile phone data. Landscape Urban Planning 191, 103642 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hu, L., Zhao, C., Wang, M., Su, S., Weng, M., Wang, W.: Dynamic healthy food accessibility in a rapidly urbanizing metropolitan area: socioeconomic inequality and relative contribution of local factors. Cities 105, 102819 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stentzel, U., Piegsa, J., Fredrich, D., Hoffmann, W., van den Berg, N.: Accessibility of general practitioners and selected specialist physicians by car and by public transport in a rural region of Germany. BMC Health Serv. Res. 16(1), 1–10 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gao, Y., He, Q., Liu, Y., Zhang, L., Wang, H., Cai, E.: Imbalance in spatial accessibility to primary and secondary schools in china: guidance for education sustainability. Sustainability 8(12), 1236 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Shi, L., Halik, Ü., Abliz, A., Mamat, Z., Welp, M.: Urban green space accessibility and distribution equity in an arid oasis city: Urumqi. China. Forests 11(6), 690 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cheng, G., et al.: Spatial difference analysis for accessibility to high level hospitals based on travel time in Shenzhen. China. Habitat Int. 53, 485–494 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yang, Y., Mueller, N.J., Croes, R.R.: Market accessibility and hotel prices in the Caribbean: the moderating effect of quality-signaling factors. Tour. Manage. 56, 40–51 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Nakamura, T., Nakamura, A., Mukuda, K., Harada, M., Kotani, K.: Potential accessibility scores for hospital care in a province of Japan: GIS-based ecological study of the two-step floating catchment area method and the number of neighborhood hospitals. BMC Health Serv. Res. 17(1), 1–7 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Carpentieri, G., Gargiulo, C., Guida, C.: The elderly and urban accessibility before and during the Covid-19 lockdown: a comparative analysis of Mediterranean cities with a focus on Naples and Milan. In: Mediterranean Economies 2020, 215–246 (2020). ISBN:978-88-15-29082

    Google Scholar 

  34. Carpentieri, G., Guida, C., Masoumi, H.E.: Multimodal accessibility to primary health services for the elderly: a case study of Naples. Italy. Sustainability 12(3), 781 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Guida, C., & Carpentieri, G.: Quality of life in the urban environment and primary health services for the elderly during the Covid-19 pandemic: an application to the city of Milan (Italy). Cities, 110, 103038 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Papa, E., Carpentieri, G., & Guida, C.: Measuring walking accessibility to public transport for the elderly: the case of Naples. TeMA – J. Land Use Mob. Environ. 105–116 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rossetti, S., Tiboni, M.: In Field Assessment of Safety, Security, Comfort and Accessibility of Bus Stops: a Planning Perspective, European Transport, Issue n. 80, December 2020, Paper n° 8, ISSN 1825–3997 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kibambe Lubamba, J.P., Radoux, J., Defourny, P.: Multimodal accessibility modeling from coarse transportation networks in Africa. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 27(5), 1005–1022 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kwan, M.P.: Space-time and integral measures of individual accessibility: A comparative analysis using a point-based framework. Geographical Analysis 30(3). Ohio State University Press, (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lindemann, U., et al.: Distance to achieve steady state walking speed in frail elderly persons. Gait Posture 27(1), 91–96 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. Rydwik, E., Bergland, A., Forsen, L., Frändin, K.: Investigation into the reliability and validity of the measurement of elderly people’s clinical walking speed: a systematic review. Physiother. Theory Pract. 28(3), 238–256 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Bauer, J., & Groneberg, D. A.: Measuring spatial accessibility of health care providers–introduction of a variable distance decay function within the floating catchment area (FCA) method. PloS One 11(7), e0159148 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Zhu, X., Tong, Z., Liu, X., Li, X., Lin, P., Wang, T.: An improved two-step floating catchment area method for evaluating spatial accessibility to urban emergency shelters. Sustainability 10(7), 218 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerardo Carpentieri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Guida, C., Gargiulo, C., Caglioni, M., Carpentieri, G. (2021). Urban Accessibility to Healthcare Facilities for the Elderly: Evolution of the Time-Based 2SFCA Methodology for the Nice Case Study (France). In: Gervasi, O., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2021. ICCSA 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12958. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87016-4_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87016-4_42

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-87015-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-87016-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics