Skip to main content

A Model-Based Reliability Analysis Method Using Bayesian Network

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Computational Intelligence Systems (UKCI 2021)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1409))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Bayesian Network (BN)-based methods are increasingly used in system reliability analysis. While BNs enable to perform multiple analyses based on a single model, the construction of robust BN models relies either on the conversion from other intermediate system model structures or direct analyst-led development based on experts input, both requiring significant human effort. This article proposes an architecture model-based approach for the direct generation of a BN model. Given the architectural model of a system, a systematic bottom-up approach is suggested, underpinned by failure behaviour models of components composed based on interaction models to create a system-level failure behaviour model. Interoperability and reusability of models are supported by a library of component failure models. The approach was illustrated with application to a case study of a steam boiler system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    BayesFusion: GeNIe Software. https://www.bayesfusion.com/.

References

  1. AIAG: Potential Failure Mode and Effect Analysis. Technical report, Automotive Industry Action Group (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amrin, A., Zarikas, V., Spitas, C.: Reliability analysis and functional design using Bayesian networks generated automatically by an “idea algebra’’ framework. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 180, 211–225 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arnold, A., Point, G., Griffault, A., Rauzy, A.: The AltaRica formalism for describing concurrent systems. Fund. Inform. 40(2), 109–124 (2000)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bittner, B., et al.: The xSAP safety analysis platform. In: Chechik, M., Raskin, J.-F. (eds.) TACAS 2016. LNCS, vol. 9636, pp. 533–539. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49674-9_31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Bobbio, A., Portinale, L., Minichino, M., Ciancamerla, E.: Improving the analysis of dependable systems by mapping fault trees into Bayesian networks. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 71(3), 249–260 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Borth, M., von Hasseln, H.: Systematic generation of Bayesian networks from systems specifications. In: Musen, M.A., Neumann, B., Studer, R. (eds.) IIP 2002. ITIFIP, vol. 93, pp. 155–166. Springer, Boston, MA (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35602-0_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Boudali, H., Dugan, J.B.: A discrete-time Bayesian network reliability modeling and analysis framework. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 87(3), 337–349 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Codetta-Raiteri, D., Portinale, L.: Generalized continuous time Bayesian networks as a modelling and analysis formalism for dependable systems. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 167, 639–651 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Doguc, O., Ramirez-Marquez, J.E.: A generic method for estimating system reliability using Bayesian networks. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 94(2), 542–550 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Feiler, P., Rugina, A.: Dependability modeling with the architecture analysis & design language (AADL). Technical report July, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fenelon, P., McDermid, J.A.: An integrated tool set for software safety analysis. J. Syst. Softw. 21(3), 279–290 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Grunske, L., Kaiser, B.: Automatic generation of analyzable failure propagation models from component-level failure annotations. In: Fifth International Conference on Quality Software(QSIC 2005), pp. 117–123 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kabir, S.: An overview of fault tree analysis and its application in model based dependability analysis. Expert Syst. Appl. 77, 114–135 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kabir, S., Papadopoulos, Y.: Applications of Bayesian networks and Petri nets in safety, reliability, and risk assessments: a review. Saf. Sci. 115, 154–175 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kabir, S., Walker, M., Papadopoulos, Y.: Reliability analysis of dynamic systems by translating temporal fault trees into Bayesian networks. In: Ortmeier, F., Rauzy, A. (eds.) IMBSA 2014. LNCS, vol. 8822, pp. 96–109. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12214-4_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Kabir, S., Walker, M., Papadopoulos, Y.: Dynamic system safety analysis in HiP-HOPS with Petri nets and Bayesian networks. Saf. Sci. 105, 55–70 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaiser, B., Liggesmeyer, P., Mäckel, O.: A new component concept for fault trees. In: Proceedings of the 8th Australian Workshop on Safety Critical Systems and Software (SCS 2003), vol. 33, pp. 37–46 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Papadopoulos, Y., McDermid, J.A.: Hierarchically performed hazard origin and propagation studies. In: Felici, M., Kanoun, K. (eds.) SAFECOMP 1999. LNCS, vol. 1698, pp. 139–152. Springer, Heidelberg (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48249-0_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Papadopoulos, Y., et al.: A synthesis of logic and bio-inspired techniques in the design of dependable systems. Annu. Rev. Control 41, 170–182 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Roshandel, R., Medvidovic, N., Golubchik, L.: A Bayesian model for predicting reliability of software systems at the architectural level. In: Overhage, S., Szyperski, C.A., Reussner, R., Stafford, J.A. (eds.) QoSA 2007. LNCS, vol. 4880, pp. 108–126. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77619-2_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Sharvia, S., Kabir, S., Walker, M., Papadopoulos, Y.: Model-based dependability analysis: state-of-the-art, challenges, and future outlook. In: Software Quality Assurance, pp. 251–278 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Torres-Toledano, J.G., Sucar, L.E.: Bayesian networks for reliability analysis of complex systems. In: Coelho, H. (ed.) IBERAMIA 1998. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1484, pp. 195–206. Springer, Heidelberg (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-49795-1_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sohag Kabir .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kabir, S., Campean, F. (2022). A Model-Based Reliability Analysis Method Using Bayesian Network. In: Jansen, T., Jensen, R., Mac Parthaláin, N., Lin, CM. (eds) Advances in Computational Intelligence Systems. UKCI 2021. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1409. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87094-2_43

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics