Skip to main content

Trainable Summarization to Improve Breast Tomosynthesis Classification

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2021 (MICCAI 2021)

Abstract

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) is an emerging imaging technique for breast cancer screening aiming to overcome certain limitations of traditional mammography, such as the superimposition of tissues. On the downside, DBT increases the radiologists’ workload as it generates stacks of high-resolution images, which are time-consuming to review and annotate. In this work, we propose a deep- multiple-instance-based method for DBT volume classification that relies on the local summarization of DBT slices (referred to as slabbing) and only requires volume-wise labels for training. Slabbing offers several advantages: i) it reduces the classifier’s computational complexity across the depth, letting it focus on the higher transversal resolution. Thanks to this strategy, we are the first to train a method at almost full-resolution (as high as 120 \(\times \) 2500 \(\times \) 2000); ii) it produces slabs that are closer to standard mammography, favoring an efficient transfer from classifiers trained on larger mammography databases; and iii) the slabs combined with a Multiple-Instance Learning (MIL) classifier result in localized information favoring interpretability. The proposed slabbing MIL approach is also novel for the automatic classification of DBTs. Moreover, we propose a trainable alternative to the handcrafted slabbing algorithms based on slice-wise attention that improves performance. We perform an experimental validation on a subset of the public BCS-DBT dataset and achieve an AUC of 0.73 with five-fold cross-validation. On a private multi-vendor dataset we obtain a similar AUC of 0.73, demonstrating an excellent performance consistency.

Supported by Hera-MI SAS, Nantes, France, European Regional Development Fund, Pays de la Loire and Nantes Métropole (Connect Talent MILCOM).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Volumes can exceed \(\approx \) \(120\times 2500\times 2000\) pixels, i.e., \(\approx \) \(600M\) pixels.

  2. 2.

    Hereafter we omit the index i from \(V_i\) and \(y_i\) to simplify the notation.

References

  1. Antropova, N., Abe, H., Giger, M.L.: Use of clinical MRI maximum intensity projections for improved breast lesion classification with deep convolutional neural networks. J. Med. Imaging 5(01), 1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.jmi.5.1.014503

  2. Balleyguier, C., Ayadi, S., Nguyen, K.V., Vanel, D., Dromain, C., Sigal, R.: BIRADS™ classification in mammography. Eur. J. Radiol. 61(2), 192–194 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.08.033

  3. Buda, M., et al.: Detection of masses and architectural distortions in digital breast tomosynthesis: a publicly available dataset of 5,060 patients and a deep learning model. arXiv:eess.IV/2011.07995 (2021)

  4. Conant, E.F., et al.: Improving accuracy and efficiency with concurrent use of artificial intelligence for digital breast tomosynthesis. Radiol. Artif. Intell. 1(4), e180096 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.2019180096

  5. DeLong, E.R., DeLong, D.M., Clarke-Pearson, D.L.: Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44(3), 837–845 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Diekmann, F., et al.: Thick slices from tomosynthesis data sets: phantom study for the evaluation of different algorithms. J. Digital Imaging 22(5), 519–526 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-007-9075-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Doganay, E., Li, P., Luo, Y., Chai, R., Guo, Y., Wu, S.: Breast cancer classification from digital breast tomosynthesis using 3D multi-subvolume approach. In: Deserno, T.M., Chen, P.H. (eds.) Medical Imaging 2020: Imaging Informatics for Healthcare, Research, and Applications, vol. 11318, p. 12. SPIE (2020). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2551376

  8. Fisher, B., et al.: Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 347(16), 1233–1241 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa022152

  9. Geras, K.J., Mann, R.M., Moy, L.: Artificial intelligence for mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: current concepts and future perspectives. Radiology 293(2), 246–259 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2019182627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hans Kleinknecht, J., Ileana Ciurea, A., Augusta Ciortea, C.: Pros and cons for breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis - a review of the literature. Med. Pharm. Rep. 93(4), 335–341 (2020). https://doi.org/10.15386/mpr-1698

  11. Houssami, N., Skaane, P.: Overview of the evidence on digital breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer detection. Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) 22(2), 101–108 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2013.01.017

  12. Lotter, W., et al.: Robust breast cancer detection in mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis using an annotation-efficient deep learning approach. Nature Med. 1–6 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-01174-9

  13. Mendel, K., Li, H., Sheth, D., Giger, M.: Transfer learning from convolutional neural networks for computer-aided diagnosis: a comparison of digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography. Acad. Radiol. 26(6), 735–743 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2018.06.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Murakami, R., Uchiyama, N., Tani, H., Yoshida, T., Kumita, S.: Comparative analysis between synthetic mammography reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography for breast cancer detection and visibility. Eur. J. Radiol. Open 7, 100207 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2019.12.001

  15. Murphy, M.C., Coffey, L., O’Neill, A.C., Quinn, C., Prichard, R., McNally, S.: Can the synthetic C view images be used in isolation for diagnosing breast malignancy without reviewing the entire digital breast tomosynthesis data set? Irish J. Med. Sci. 187(4), 1077–1081 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-018-1748-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nguyen, T., et al.: Overview of digital breast tomosynthesis: clinical cases, benefits and disadvantages. Diagn. Intervent. Imaging 96(9), 843–859 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2015.03.003

  17. Ribli, D., Horváth, A., Unger, Z., Pollner, P., Csabai, I.: Detecting and classifying lesions in mammograms with deep learning. Sci. Rep. 8(1), 1–7 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22437-z

  18. Siegel, R.L., Miller, K.D., Fuchs, H.E., Jemal, A.: Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J. Clin. 71(1), 7–33 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21654

  19. Tardy, M., Mateus, D.: Looking for abnormalities in mammograms with self-and weakly supervised reconstruction. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2021.3050040

  20. Vedantham, S., Karellas, A., Vijayaraghavan, G.R., Kopans, D.B.: Digital breast tomosynthesis: state of the art. Radiology 277(3), 663–684 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015141303

  21. Wang, X., Liang, G., Zhang, Y., Blanton, H., Bessinger, Z., Jacobs, N.: Inconsistent performance of deep learning models on mammogram classification. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 17(6), 796–803 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2020.01.006

  22. Wu, N., et al.: Deep neural networks improve radiologists’ performance in breast cancer screening. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 39(4), 1184–1194 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2019.2945514

  23. Zhang, Y., Wang, X., Blanton, H., Liang, G., Xing, X., Jacobs, N.: 2D convolutional neural networks for 3D digital breast tomosynthesis classification. In: Proceedings - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine, BIBM 2019, pp. 1013–1017. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., November 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/BIBM47256.2019.8983097

  24. Zheng, S., Guo, J., Cui, X., Veldhuis, R.N., Oudkerk, M., Van Ooijen, P.M.: Automatic pulmonary nodule detection in CT scans using convolutional neural networks based on maximum intensity projection. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 39(3), 797–805 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2019.2935553

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tardy, M., Mateus, D. (2021). Trainable Summarization to Improve Breast Tomosynthesis Classification. In: de Bruijne, M., et al. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2021. MICCAI 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12907. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87234-2_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87234-2_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-87233-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-87234-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics