Skip to main content

Determination of Error in 3D CT to 2D Fluoroscopy Image Registration for Endobronchial Guidance

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2021 (MICCAI 2021)

Abstract

Endobronchial biopsy is the preferred method for assessing lung lesions. However, navigation to pulmonary lesions and obtaining adequate tissue samples for diagnosis remains challenging. Utilizing information from high-resolution pre-procedural CT scans intra-procedurally could provide real-time guidance and confirmation during biopsy. An image registration algorithm was developed to automatically fuse thoracic 3D pre-operative CT images to 2D intra-procedural fluoroscopic images with a single 2D image or a limited C-arm sweep. A rigid intensity-based technique was applied and the CT image was iteratively transformed to minimize the sum of squared error between intraoperative fluoroscopy and closest forward projections. The registration errors were measured by computing the sum of squared difference and manually identified fiducial markers. In a swine model, error was minimized when using a CT with an inhalation breath hold (\(7.7\pm 4.4\) mm) and when using an anterior-posterior positioning of the C-arm (\(3.7\pm 2.4\) mm). Error increased marginally when the FOV was decreased (\(10.9\pm 5.9\) mm) and was larger in peripheral (\(9.7\pm 5.7\) mm) and distal (\(9.2\pm 3.2\) mm) lung, compared to central (\(6.2\pm 4.5\) mm) and proximal (\(7.6\pm 5.9\) mm) lung. To determine the features that contribute most to registration, features were systematically masked and registration was performed. The largest error was seen when the spine was masked (\(52.5\pm 27.6\) mm). When multiple images were used for registration, error converges (\({<}5\%\) change) when 50 images acquired in a \(100^{\circ }\) sweep were used. This work establishes a protocol and identifies sources of registration error for a reliable and automatic 2D-3D registration method that requires minimal changes to procedural workflow and equipment in the endobronchial suite.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bhatt, K.M., et al.: Electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy versus CT-guided percutaneous sampling of peripheral indeterminate pulmonary nodules: a cohort study. Radiology 286(3), 1052–1061 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017170893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen, Y., Khemasuwan, D., Simoff, M.J.: Lung cancer screening: detected nodules, what next? Lung Cancer Manag. 5(4), 173–184 (2016). https://doi.org/10.2217/lmt-2016-0008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dondelinger, R.F., et al.: Relevant radiological anatomy of the pig as a training model in interventional radiology. Eur. Radiol. 8(7), 1254–1273 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s003300050545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fielding, D.I.K., et al.: First human use of a new robotic-assisted fiber optic sensing navigation system for small peripheral pulmonary nodules. Respiration 98(2), 142–150 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1159/000498951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Folch, E.E., Pritchett, M.A., Nead, M.A., et al.: Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy for peripheral pulmonary lesions: one-year results of the prospective, multicenter NAVIGATE study. J. Thorac. Oncol. 14(3), 445–458 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2018.11.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gilhuijs, K.G., van de Ven, P.J., van Herk, M.: Automatic three-dimensional inspection of patient setup in radiation therapy using portal images, simulator images, and computed tomography data. Med. Phys. 23(3), 389–399 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1118/1.597801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gould, M.K., et al.: Evaluation of individuals with pulmonary nodules: when is it lung cancer? Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American college of chest physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 143(5), 93–120 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.12-2351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Heerink, W.J., de Bock, G.H., de Jonge, G.J., Groen, H.J.M., Vliegenthart, R., Oudkerk, M.: Complication rates of CT-guided transthoracic lung biopsy: meta-analysis. Eur. Radiol. 27(1), 138–148 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4357-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Judge, E.P., Hughes, J.M.L., Egan, J.J., Maguire, M., Molloy, E.L., O’Dea, S.: Anatomy and bronchoscopy of the porcine lung. a model for translational respiratory medicine. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 51(3), 334–343 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1165/rcmb.2013-0453TR

  10. Khamene, A., Bloch, P., Wein, W., Svatos, M., Sauer, F.: Automatic registration of portal images and volumetric CT for patient positioning in radiation therapy. Med. Image Anal. 10(1), 96–112 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2005.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lemieux, L., Jagoe, R., Fish, D.R., Kitchen, N.D., Thomas, D.G.: A patient-to-computed-tomography image registration method based on digitally reconstructed radiographs. Med. Phys. 21(11), 1749–1760 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1118/1.597276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Memoli, J.S.W., Nietert, P.J., Silvestri, G.A.: Meta-analysis of guided bronchoscopy for the evaluation of the pulmonary nodule. Chest 142(2), 385–393 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.11-1764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. National Lung Screening Trial Research Team: The National Lung Screening Trial: overview and study design. Radiology 258(1), 243–253 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10091808

  14. National Lung Screening Trial Research Team: Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N. Engl. J. Med. 365(5), 395–409 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1102873

  15. Ost, D.E., Ernst, A., Lei, X., et al.: Diagnostic yield and complications of bronchoscopy for peripheral lung lesions: results of the AQuIRE registry. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care 193(1), 68–77 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201507-1332OC

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pritchett, M.A., Schampaert, S., de Groot, J.A.H., Schirmer, C.C., van der Bom, I.: Cone-beam CT with augmented fluoroscopy combined with electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy for biopsy of pulmonary nodules. J. Bronchology Interv. Pulmonol. 25(4), 274–282 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1097/LBR.0000000000000536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rojas-Solano, J.R., Ugalde-Gamboa, L., Machuzak, M.: Robotic bronchoscopy for diagnosis of suspected lung cancer: A feasibility study. J. Bronchol. Interv. Pulmonol. 25(3), 168–175 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1097/LBR.0000000000000499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. de Ruiter, Q.M.B., Karanian, J.W., Bakhutashvili, I., et al.: Endobronchial navigation guided by cone-beam CT-based augmented fluoroscopy without a bronchoscope: feasibility study in phantom and swine. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 31(12), 2122–2131 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2020.04.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wiener, R.S., Schwartz, L.M., Woloshin, S., Welch, H.G.: Population-based risk for complications after transthoracic needle lung biopsy of a pulmonary nodule: an analysis of discharge records. Ann. Intern. Med. 155(3), 137–144 (2011). https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-3-201108020-00003

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Data was collected at the National Institutes of Health Center for Interventional Oncology with Animal Care and Use Committee approval and under a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement. The authors would like to thank William Pritchard, John Karanian, Juan Esparza-Trujillo, Ivane Bakhutashvili, and Ming Li for assistance in collection of preclinical data and stimulating conversation that has enhanced the work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicole Varble .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Varble, N. et al. (2021). Determination of Error in 3D CT to 2D Fluoroscopy Image Registration for Endobronchial Guidance. In: de Bruijne, M., et al. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2021. MICCAI 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12907. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87234-2_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87234-2_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-87233-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-87234-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics