Skip to main content

A Bootstrap Self-training Method for Sequence Transfer: State-of-the-Art Placenta Segmentation in fetal MRI

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Uncertainty for Safe Utilization of Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, and Perinatal Imaging, Placental and Preterm Image Analysis (UNSURE 2021, PIPPI 2021)

Abstract

Quantitative volumetric evaluation of the placenta in fetal MRI scans is an important component of the fetal health evaluation. However, manual segmentation of the placenta is a time-consuming task that requires expertise and suffers from high observer variability. Deep learning methods for automatic segmentation are effective but require manually annotated datasets for each scanning sequence. We present a new method for bootstrapping automatic placenta segmentation by deep learning on different MRI sequences. The method consists of automatic placenta segmentation with two networks trained on labeled cases of one sequence followed by automatic adaptation using self-training of the same network to a new sequence with new unlabeled cases of this sequence. It uses a novel combined contour and soft Dice loss function for both the placenta ROI detection and segmentation networks. Our experimental studies for the FIESTA sequence yields a Dice score of 0.847 on 21 test cases with only 16 cases in the training set. Transfer to the TRUFI sequence yields a Dice score of 0.78 on 15 test cases, a significant improvement over the network results without transfer learning. The contour Dice loss and self-training approach achieve state-of-the art placenta segmentation results by sequence transfer bootstrapping.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Leyendecker, J.R., et al.: MRI of pregnancy-related issues: abnormal placentation. Am. J. Roentgenol. 198(2), 311–320 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dahdouh, S., et al.: In vivo placental MRI shape and textural features predict fetal growth restriction and postnatal outcome. J. Magn. Resonan. Imaging 47(2), 449–458 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kveller-Fenster, S.: Placenta segmentation in fetal MRI scans by deep learning: a bootstrapping approach. MSc. thesis, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, March 2021

    Google Scholar 

  4. Alansary, A., et al.: Fast fully automatic segmentation of the human placenta from motion corrupted MRI. In: Ourselin, S., Joskowicz, L., Sabuncu, M.R., Unal, G., Wells, W. (eds.) MICCAI 2016. LNCS, vol. 9901, pp. 589–597. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46723-8_68

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Torrents-Barrena, J., et al.: Fully automatic 3D reconstruction of the placenta and its peripheral vasculature in intrauterine fetal MRI. Med. Image Anal. 54, 263–279 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Han, M., et al.: Automatic segmentation of human placenta images with U-Net (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2958133

  7. Quah, B., et al.: Comparison of pure deep Learning approaches for placental extraction from dynamic functional MRI sequences between 19 and 37 gestational weeks. In: Proceedings of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pietsch, M., et al.:. APPLAUSE: automatic prediction of PLAcental health via U-net segmentation and statistical evaluation. In: Proceedings of Conference on International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wang, G., et al.: Slic-Seg: a minimally interactive segmentation of the placenta from sparse and motion-corrupted fetal MRI in multiple views. Med. Image Anal. 34, 137–147 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang, G., et al.: DeepIGeoS: a deep interactive geodesic framework for medical image segmentation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 41(7), 1559–1572 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shahedi M, et al.: Segmentation of uterus and placenta in MR images using a fully convolutional neural network. In: Proceedings of SPIE Conference on Computer-Aided Diagnosis (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Xia, Y., et al.: Uncertainty-aware multi-view co-training for semi-supervised medical image segmentation and domain adaptation. Med. Image Anal. 65, 101766 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zou Y, Yu Z, Kumar BV, Wang J.: Unsupervised domain adaptation for semantic segmentation via class-balanced self-training. In: Proceedings of European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 289–305 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cheplygina, V., de Bruijne, M., Pluim, J.P.: Not-so-supervised: a survey of self-supervised, multi-instance, and transfer learning in medical image analysis. Med. Image Anal. 54, 280–296 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tajbakhsh, N., Jeyaseelan, L., Li, Q., Chiang, J.N., Wu, Z., Ding, X.: Embracing imperfect datasets: a review of deep learning solutions for medical image segmentation. Med. Image Anal. 63, 101693 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nie, D., Gao, Y., Wang, L., Shen, D.: ASDNet: attention based semi-supervised deep networks for medical image segmentation. In: Frangi, A., Schnabel, J., Davatzikos, C., Alberola-López, C., Fichtinger, G. (eds.) Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2018. MICCAI 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 11073, pp. 370–378. Springer, Caam (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00937-3_43

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Zoph, B., et al.: Rethinking pre-training and self-training. Adv. Neural. Inf. Process. Syst. 33, 3833–3845 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Isensee, F., Jaeger, P.F., Kohl, S.A., Petersen, J., Maier-Hein, K.H.: nnU-net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation. Nat. Methods 18(2), 203–211 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dudovitch, G., Link-Sourani, D., Ben Sira, L., Miller, E., Ben Bashat, D., Joskowicz, L.: Deep learning automatic fetal structures segmentation in mri scans with few annotated datasets. In: Martel, A.L., et al. (eds.) MICCAI 2020. LNCS, vol. 12266, pp. 365–374. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59725-2_35

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Nikolov S, et al.: Deep learning to achieve clinically applicable segmentation of head and neck anatomy for radiotherapy. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.04430, 12 September 2018

  21. Kiser, K., Barman, A., Stieb, S., Fuller, C.D., Giancardo, L.: Novel autosegmentation spatial similarity metrics capture the time required to correct segmentations better than traditional metrics in a thoracic cavity segmentation workflow. medRxiv preprint, January 2020

    Google Scholar 

  22. Moltz, J.H., et al.: Learning a loss function for segmentation: a feasibility study. In: Proceedings of IEEE 17th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, pp. 357–360 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kervadec, H., Bouchtiba, J., Desrosiers, C., Granger, E., Dolz, J., Ben Ayed, I.: Boundary loss for highly unbalanced segmentation. Med. Image Anal. 67, 101851 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang, G., Li, W., Aertsen, M., Deprest, J., Ourselin, S., Vercauteren, T.: Aleatoric uncertainty estimation with test-time augmentation for medical image segmentation with convolutional neural networks. Neurocomputing 338, 34–45 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by Kamin Grants 72061 and 72126 from the Israel Innovation Authority.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bella Specktor-Fadida .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Specktor-Fadida, B. et al. (2021). A Bootstrap Self-training Method for Sequence Transfer: State-of-the-Art Placenta Segmentation in fetal MRI. In: Sudre, C.H., et al. Uncertainty for Safe Utilization of Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, and Perinatal Imaging, Placental and Preterm Image Analysis. UNSURE PIPPI 2021 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12959. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87735-4_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87735-4_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-87734-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-87735-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics