Skip to main content

Promises and Challenges of Reinforcement Learning Applications in Motion Planning of Automated Vehicles

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing (ICAISC 2021)

Abstract

As automated driving development progresses forward, novel methods are required to handle the vastness of possible road situations and to face end user’s high demands. Trying to solve the problem of motion control involving decision making and trajectory planning it is reasonable to take into consideration reinforcement learning as a viable approach. In this paper, we present the promises reinforcement learning can bring to an automated driving domain and the list of challenges we encountered during our work. We address the issues related to the environment definition, sample efficiency, safety and explainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Autonomous Vehicle Data Annotation Market Analysis. https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/4985697/autonomous-vehicle-data-annotation-market-analysis

  2. Captum. Model Interpretability for PyTorch. https://captum.ai/

  3. GitHub - iamhatesz/rld: A development tool for evaluation and interpretability of reinforcement learning agents. https://github.com/iamhatesz/rld

  4. Off road, but not offline: How simulation helps advance our Waymo Driver. https://blog.waymo.com/2020/04/off-road-but-not-offline-simulation27.html

  5. sicara/tf-explain: Interpretability Methods for tf.keras models with Tensorflow 2.x. https://github.com/sicara/tf-explain

  6. Traffic AI – Simteract. http://simteract.com/traffic-ai/

  7. Achiam, J., Held, D., Tamar, A., Abbeel, P.: Constrained policy optimization. CoRR abs/1705.10528 (2017). http://arxiv.org/abs/1705.10528

  8. Administration, F.H.: Highway statistics, 2018. Technical report, Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Amodei, D., Olah, C., Steinhardt, J., Christiano, P.F., Schulman, J., Mané, D.: Concrete Problems in AI Safety. CoRR abs/1606.06565 (2016). http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.06565

  10. Badia, A.P., et al.: Agent57: Outperforming the Atari Human Benchmark (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bansal, M., Krizhevsky, A., Ogale, A.S.: ChauffeurNet: Learning to Drive by Imitating the Best and Synthesizing the Worst. CoRR abs/1812.03079 (2018). http://arxiv.org/abs/1812.03079

  12. Bojarski, M., et al.: End to End Learning for Self-Driving Cars (2016). http://arxiv.org/abs/1604.07316

  13. Dulac-Arnold, G., Mankowitz, D.J., Hester, T.: Challenges of Real-World Reinforcement Learning. CoRR abs/1904.12901 (2019). http://arxiv.org/abs/1904.12901

  14. Dworak, D., Ciepiela, F., Derbisz, J., Izzat, I., Komorkiewicz, M., Wojcik, M.: Performance of LiDAR object detection deep learning architectures based on artificially generated point cloud data from CARLA simulator. In: 2019 24th International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics, MMAR 2019, pp. 600–605. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/MMAR.2019.8864642

  15. Haarnoja, T., Zhou, A., Abbeel, P., Levine, S.: Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actor (2018). http://arxiv.org/abs/1801.01290

  16. Haarnoja, T., et al.: Soft Actor-Critic Algorithms and Applications. CoRR abs/1812.05905 (2018). http://arxiv.org/abs/1812.05905

  17. Hochreiter, S., Schmidhuber, J.: Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 9(8), 1735–1780 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735

  18. Jung, C., Lee, D., Lee, S., Shim, D.H.: V2x-communication-aided autonomous driving: system design and experimental validation. Sensors (Switzerland) 20(10), 2903 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/s20102903, http://pmc/articles/ PMC7287954/?report=abstract www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7287954/

  19. Kalra, N., Paddock, S.M.: Driving to safety: how many miles of driving would it take to demonstrate autonomous vehicle reliability? Trans. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 94, 182–193 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kang, B., Jie, Z., Feng, J.: Policy optimization with demonstrations. In: 35th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2018, vol. 6, pp. 3855–3869 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kass, S.J., Cole, K.S., Stanny, C.J.: Effects of distraction and experience on situation awareness and simulated driving. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 10(4), 321–329 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2006.12.002

  22. Lajunen, T., Parker, D.: Are aggressive people aggressive drivers? A study of the relationship between self-reported general aggressiveness, driver anger and aggressive driving. Accid. Anal. Prev. 33(2), 243–255 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(00)00039-7, https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0001457500000397

  23. Mnih, V., et al.: Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learning (2013). http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.5602

  24. Molenaar, R., Van Bilsen, A., Van Der Made, R., De Vries, R.: Full spectrum camera simulation for reliable virtual development and validation of ADAS and automated driving applications. In: IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Proceedings, vol. 2015-August, pp. 47–52. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2015.7225661

  25. Molnar, C.: Interpretable Machine Learning (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nistér, D., Lee, H.L., Ng, J., Wang, Y.: The Safety Force Field. Technical report

    Google Scholar 

  27. World Health Organization et al.: Global status report on road safety 2018: Summary. World Health Organization, Technical report (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Orłowski, M., Wrona, T., Pankiewicz, N., Turlej, W.: Safe and goal-based highway maneuver planning with reinforcement learning. In: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 1196 AISC, pp. 1261–1274. Springer (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50936-1_105, https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-50936-1_105

  29. Pek, C., Althoff, M.: Computationally efficient fail-safe trajectory planning for self-driving vehicles using convex optimization. In: 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pp. 1447–1454. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Schulman, J., Wolski, F., Dhariwal, P., Radford, A., Klimov, O.: Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms (2017). http://arxiv.org/abs/1707.06347

  31. Shalev-Shwartz, S., Shammah, S., Shashua, A.: On a Formal Model of Safe and Scalable Self-driving Cars (2017). http://arxiv.org/abs/1708.06374

  32. Sundararajan, M., Taly, A., Yan, Q.: Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networks. Technical report (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Torabi, F., Warnell, G., Stone, P.: Behavioral cloning from observation. In: IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2018-July(July), pp. 4950–4957 (2018). https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2018/687

  34. Via, E.: What would \(\Pi \) do?: Imitation Learning via off-policy Reinforcement Learning, pp. 1–13 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wu, Y.H., Charoenphakdee, N., Bao, H., Tangkaratt, V., Sugiyama, M.: Imitation Learning from Imperfect Demonstration. Technical report. https://www.basketball-reference.com/leagues/NBA_stats.html

  36. YoungPaul, K.L., Salmon, M.: Examining the relationship between driver distraction and driving errors: a discussion of theory, studies and methods. Safe. Sci. 50(2), pp. 165–174 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nikodem Pankiewicz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pankiewicz, N., Wrona, T., Turlej, W., Orłowski, M. (2021). Promises and Challenges of Reinforcement Learning Applications in Motion Planning of Automated Vehicles. In: Rutkowski, L., Scherer, R., Korytkowski, M., Pedrycz, W., Tadeusiewicz, R., Zurada, J.M. (eds) Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing. ICAISC 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12855. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87897-9_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87897-9_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-87896-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-87897-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics