Skip to main content

The Usage of Possibility Degree in the Multi-criteria Decision-Analysis Problems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing (ICAISC 2021)

Abstract

More and more multi-criteria problems are being analysed in an uncertain environment where the decision-making attributes’ exact values are not known. For this reason, new methods are also being developed that can assess alternatives in conditions of uncertainty. However, many methods evaluate alternatives not as an exact value but as a preference interval value. It raises the problem of how to rank the alternatives assessed as interval values finally.

In this paper, we propose a simple approach to ranking, where a matrix of the possibility degree values is created based on which the final ranking is obtained. Afterwards, we compare the rankings identified by using the proposed method with naive approaches. For this purpose, a short numerical example is presented, where seven different formulas of the possibility degree are involved. In this example, the interval assessment is obtained by using the COMET method and the obtained results are ranked and compared with naive approaches and reference ranking. The proposed approach is useful and straightforward for ranking alternatives under uncertain conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Da, Q., Liu, X.: Interval number linear programming and its satisfactory solution. Syst. Eng. Theory Practice 19, 3–7 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Faizi, S., Rashid, T., Sałabun, W., Zafar, S., Wątróbski, J.: Decision making with uncertainty using hesitant fuzzy sets. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 20(1), 93–103 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Faizi, S., Sałabun, W., Ullah, S., Rashid, T., Więckowski, J.: A new method to support decision-making in an uncertain environment based on normalized interval-valued triangular fuzzy numbers and comet technique. Symmetry 12(4), 516 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Faizi, S., Sałabun, W., Nawaz, S., ur Rehman, A., Wątróbski, J.: Best-worst method and hamacher aggregation operations for intuitionistic 2-tuple linguistic sets. Expert Syst. Appl. 115088 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115088

  5. Fengji, G.: Possibility degree and comprehensive priority of interval numbers. Syst. Eng. Theory Pract. 33(8), 2033–2040 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gu, Y., Zhang, S., Zhang, M.: Interval number comparison and decision making based on priority degree. In: Cao, B.-Y., Wang, P.-Z., Liu, Z.-L., Zhong, Y.-B. (eds.) International Conference on Oriental Thinking and Fuzzy Logic. AISC, vol. 443, pp. 197–205. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30874-6_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Lan, J.B., Cao, L.J., Lin, J.: Method for ranking interval numbers based on two-dimensional priority degree. J. Chongqing Inst. Technol. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 10 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Li, D., Gu, Y.: Method for ranking interval numbers based on possibility degree. Xitong Gongcheng Xuebao 23(2), 243 (2008)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Piegat, A., Sałabun, W.: Identification of a multicriteria decision-making model using the characteristic objects method. Appl. Comput. Intell. Soft Comput. 2014 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rehman, A., Shekhovtsov, A., Rehman, N., Faizi, S., Sałabun, W.: On the analytic hierarchy process structure in group decision-making using incomplete fuzzy information with applications. Symmetry 13(4), 609 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Riaz, M., Sałabun, W., Farid, H.M.A., Ali, N., Wątróbski, J.: A robust q-rung orthopair fuzzy information aggregation using einstein operations with application to sustainable energy planning decision management. Energies 13(9), 2155 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sałabun, W., et al.: A fuzzy inference system for players evaluation in multi-player sports: the football study case. Symmetry 12(12), 2029 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sałabun, W., Urbaniak, K.: A new coefficient of rankings similarity in decision-making problems. In: Krzhizhanovskaya, V.V., et al. (eds.) ICCS 2020. LNCS, vol. 12138, pp. 632–645. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50417-5_47

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Sałabun, W., Wątróbski, J., Shekhovtsov, A.: Are MCDA methods benchmarkable? A comparative study of TOPSIS, VIKOR, COPRAS, and PROMETHEE II methods. Symmetry 12(9), 1549 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shekhovtsov, A., Kołodziejczyk, J., Sałabun, W.: Fuzzy model identification using monolithic and structured approaches in decision problems with partially incomplete data. Symmetry 12(9), 1541 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wan, S., Dong, J.: A possibility degree method for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 80(1), 237–256 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang, Y.M., Yang, J.B., Xu, D.L.: A two-stage logarithmic goal programming method for generating weights from interval comparison matrices. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 152(3), 475–498 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang, Y.J., Lee, H.S.: Generalizing topsis for fuzzy multiple-criteria group decision-making. Comput. Math. Appl. 53(11), 1762–1772 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Wątróbski, J., Jankowski, J., Ziemba, P., Karczmarczyk, A., Zioło, M.: Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection. Omega 86, 107–124 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wątróbski, J., Małecki, K., Kijewska, K., Iwan, S., Karczmarczyk, A., Thompson, R.G.: Multi-criteria analysis of electric vans for city logistics. Sustainability 9(8), 1453 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by the National Science Centre, Decision number UMO-2018/29/B/HS4/02725.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wojciech Sałabun .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Shekhovtsov, A., Kizielewicz, B., Sałabun, W., Piegat, A. (2021). The Usage of Possibility Degree in the Multi-criteria Decision-Analysis Problems. In: Rutkowski, L., Scherer, R., Korytkowski, M., Pedrycz, W., Tadeusiewicz, R., Zurada, J.M. (eds) Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing. ICAISC 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12855. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87897-9_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87897-9_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-87896-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-87897-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics