Skip to main content

Estimating Semantics Distance of Texts Based on Used Terms Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Collective Intelligence (ICCCI 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 12876))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1269 Accesses

Abstract

Every day we are facing countless texts on various topics. With a growing number of resources, it is getting harder to find valuable content. There is a need for automated tools to evaluate texts and propose new reads based on their similarity to the original one. The paper aims at introducing a method for calculating the semantic distance between two texts. We use well-known morphological tools to disambiguate the meaning and function of each word in the text. Next, we create the similarity matrixes utilizing the weight of WordNet synset relations. Each term can be part of one of three sets, which visualize three levels of semantic distance. While calculating the distance between texts, we consider statistical characteristics that partly use the identification of terms. However, the primary stress is put on the meaning each word brings to the utterance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Broda, B., Niton, B., Gruszczynski, W., Ogrodniczuk, M.: Measuring readability of polish texts: baseline experiments. In: LREC, vol. 24, pp. 573–580 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Debowski, Ł., Broda, B., Nitoń, B., Charzyńska, E.: Jasnopis-a program to compute readability of texts in polish based on psycholinguistic research. In: Natural Language Processing and Cognitive Science, p. 51 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dziob, A., Piasecki, M., Rudnicka, E.: plwordnet 4.1-a linguistically motivated, corpus-based bilingual resource. In: Fellbaum, C., Vossen, P., Rudnicka, E., Maziarz, M., Piasecki, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 10th Global WordNet Conference, Wroclaw, Poland, 23–27 July 2019, pp. 353–362. Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej, Wrocław (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Krótkiewicz, M., Wojtkiewicz, K.: Introduction to semantic knowledge base: Linguistic module. In: 2013 6th International Conference on Human System Interactions (HSI), pp. 356–362. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Krótkiewicz, Wojtkiewicz: Features for text comparison. In: Pietka, E., Kawa, J. (eds.) Information Technologies in Biomedicine, pp. 468–475. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68168-7_52

  6. Kedzia, P., Piasecki, M., Orlińska, M.: Word sense disambiguation based on large scale polish CLARIN heterogeneous lexical resources. Cogn. Stud. Cogn. 15, 269–292 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Maziarz, M., Piasecki, M., Rudnicka, E., Szpakowicz, S., Kedzia, P.: PlWordNet 3.0 - a comprehensive lexical-semantic resource. In: Calzolari, N., Matsumoto, Y., Prasad, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers, COLING 2016, Osaka, Japan, 11–16 December 2016, pp. 2259–2268. ACL (2016). http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/C16-1213

  8. Miller, G.A.: WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT press (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Piasecki, M., Szpakowicz, S., Broda, B.: A WordNet from the ground up. Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wroclawskiej, Wroclaw (2009). http://www.dbc.wroc.pl/Content/4220/_Wordnet.pdf

  10. Straková, J., Straka, M., Hajič, J.: Open-source tools for morphology, lemmatization, POS tagging and named entity recognition. In: Proceedings of 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations, Baltimore, Maryland, pp. 13–18. Association for Computational Linguistics (June 2014). http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P/P14/P14-5003.pdf

  11. Walentynowicz, W.: MorphoDiTa-based tagger for polish language (2017). CLARIN-PL digital repository. http://hdl.handle.net/11321/425

  12. Woliński, M.: Morfeusz – a practical tool for the morphological analysis of Polish. In: Kłopotek, M.A., Wierzchoń, S.T., Trojanowski, K. (eds.) Intelligent Information Processing and Web Mining. Advances in Soft Computing, pp. 503–512. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-33521-8_55

  13. Woliński, M.: Morfeusz reloaded. In: Calzolari, N., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2014, Reykjavík, Iceland, pp. 1106–1111. European Language Resources Association (ELRA) (2014). http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2014/index.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Krystian Wojtkiewicz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wojtkiewicz, K., Kawa, M. (2021). Estimating Semantics Distance of Texts Based on Used Terms Analysis. In: Nguyen, N.T., Iliadis, L., Maglogiannis, I., Trawiński, B. (eds) Computational Collective Intelligence. ICCCI 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12876. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88081-1_50

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88081-1_50

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-88080-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-88081-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics