Abstract
Autonomous Guided Vehicles (AGV) are an enabling technology that has changed the landscape for the new generation of manufacturing systems. Because AGV must interact with a heterogenous production environment, communication between an AGV and other devices must be established dynamically. This includes the production stands, production systems, manufacturing infrastructure, and cooperation with other AGVs. The focus of this paper is the ontological approach that enables dynamic communications with an AGV that must be adapted to changing operating conditions. The aim of this work is to review the existing approaches using ontologies for industrial communication, to evoke a discussion, and to elucidate the current research opportunities by highlighting the relationship between different subareas of communication with an AGV.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
References
Cupek, R., Ziebinski, A., Fojcik, M.: An ontology model for communicating with an autonomous mobile platform. In: Kozielski, S., Mrozek, D., Kasprowski, P., Małysiak-Mrozek, B., Kostrzewa, D. (eds.) BDAS 2017. CCIS, vol. 716, pp. 480–493. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58274-0_38
Arai, T., Aiyama, Y., Maeda, Y., Sugi, M., Ota, J.: Agile assembly system by “plug and produce.” CIRP Ann. 49(1), 1–4 (2000)
Pinto, H.S., Martins, J.P.: Ontologies: how can they be built? Knowl. Inf. Syst. 6(4), 441–464 (2004)
Cupek, R., Drewniak, M., Ziebinski, A.: Information models for a new generation of manufacturing systems-a case study of automated guided vehicle. In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC), pp. 858–864. IEEE (2019)
IEEE Standard Ontologies for Robotics and Automation. IEEE Std. 1872–2015 (2015)
Tenorth, M., Perzylo, A., Lafrenz, R., Beetz, M.: The roboearth language: representing and exchanging knowledge about actions, objects, and environments. In: International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (2012)
Schlenoff, C., Messina, E.: A robot ontology for urban search and rescue. In: Proceedings of the CIKM 2005 Workshop on Research in Knowledge Representation for Autonomous Systems (2005)
Schlenoff, C., Washington, R., Barbera, T., Manteuffel, C., Dungrani, S.: A standard intelligent systems ontology. In: Proceedings of the SPIE Defense and Security Symposium, Unmanned Ground Vehicle Technology VII Conference. Orlando, FL (2005)
Cupek, R., Ziebinski, A., Huczala, L., Erdogan, H.: Agent-based manufacturing execution systems for short-series production scheduling. Comput. Ind. 82, 245–258 (2016)
van Heist, G., Schreiber, A.T., Wielinga, B.J.: Using explicit ontologies in KBS development. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 46(2/3), 183–292 (1997)
Scholten, B.: The road to integration: a guide to applying the ISA-95 standard in manufacturing. Isa (2007)
Harjunkoski, I., Bauer, R.: Sharing data for production scheduling using the ISA-95 standard. Front. Energy Res. 2, 44 (2014)
Kannengiesser, U., Neubauer, M., Heininger, R.: Integrating business processes and manufacturing operations based on S-BPM and B2MML. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Subject-oriented Business Process Management, pp. 1–10 (2016)
Williams, T.J., et al.: Architectures for integrating manufacturing activities and enterprises. Comput. Ind. 24(2–3), 111–139 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-3615(94)90016-7
Prades, L., Romero, F., Estruch, A., García-Domínguez, A., Serrano, J.: Defining a methodology to design and implement business process models in BPMN according to the standard ANSI/ISA-95 in a manufacturing enterprise. Proc. Eng. 63, 115–122 (2013)
Technologies, K., et al.: Smart factory of industry 4.0. Appl. Case Chall. IEEE Access 6, 6505–6519 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2783682
Cupek, R., Drewniak, M., Ziebinski, A., Fojcik, M.: “Digital Twins” for highly customized electronic devices-case study on a rework operation. IEEE Access 7, 164127–164143 (2019)
Seyedamir, A., Ferrer, B.R., Martinez Lastra, J.L.: An ISA-95 based Ontology for manufacturing systems knowledge description extended with semantic rules. In: 2018 IEEE 16th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN), pp. 374–380. IEEE, Porto (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/INDIN.2018.8471929
An, Y., Qin, F., Chen, B., Simon, R., Wu, H.: OntoPLC: semantic model of PLC programs for code exchange and software reuse. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 17, 1702–1711 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2020.2997360
Compton, M., et al.: The SSN ontology of the W3C semantic sensor network incubator group. J. Web Semant. 17, 25–32 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2012.05.003
Alaya, M.B., Medjiah, S., Monteil, T., Drira, K.: Toward semantic interoperability in oneM2M architecture. IEEE Commun. Mag. 53, 35–41 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2015.7355582
Schachinger, D., Kastner, W.: Semantic interface for machine-to-machine communication in building automation. In: 2017 IEEE 13th International Workshop on Factory Communication Systems (WFCS), pp. 1–9. IEEE, Trondheim, Norway (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/WFCS.2017.7991956
Kapoor, B.: A comparative study of ontology building tools in semantic web applications (2020). https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3697900
Clunis, J.: Comparative survey of ontology editors for the semantic web. In: iConference 2019 Proceedings iSchools (2019). https://doi.org/10.21900/iconf.2019.103300
Dolzhenkov, V.N.: Software tools for ontology development. IJATCSE. 9, 935–941 (2020). https://doi.org/10.30534/ijatcse/2020/05922020
Alatrish, E.S.: Comparison some of ontology editors. (2014)
Musen, M.A.: Protégé team: the protégé project: a look back and a look forward. AI Matt. 1, 4–12 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2757001.2757003
Stellato, A., et al.: VocBench 3: a collaborative semantic web editor for ontologies, thesauri and lexicons. Semant. Web 11, 855–881 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-200370
Acknowledgements
The research that led to these results received funding from the Norway Grants 2014–2021 operated by the National Centre for Research and Development under the project “Automated Guided Vehicles integrated with Collaborative Robots for Smart Industry Perspective” (Project Contract no.: NOR/POLNOR/CoBotAGV/0027/2019 -00).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Cupek, R., Fojcik, M., Gaj, P., Stój, J. (2021). Ontology-Based Approaches for Communication with Autonomous Guided Vehicles for Industry 4.0. In: Wojtkiewicz, K., Treur, J., Pimenidis, E., Maleszka, M. (eds) Advances in Computational Collective Intelligence. ICCCI 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1463. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88113-9_39
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88113-9_39
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-88112-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-88113-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)