Skip to main content

Redesign with Accessibility in Mind: A Visual Impairment Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Serious Games (JCSG 2021)

Abstract

The role of the teacher is to help students improve their knowledge and skills. While it is acknowledged that learning occurs within specific activities and contexts, the adaptation of learning settings to distinct didactical objectives and learner needs remains a challenge. Under these premises, the authors explore the demanding endeavour of creating and tailoring game-based learning activities for specific subjects. The design and personalisation of rich media applications require an extra effort on the teacher side and imply advanced skills. The paper explores the opportunity to reuse gamified lesson plans using an authoring pipeline that reunited authoring tools, game narratives and minigames.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

1. References

  1. Iten, N., Petko, D.: Learning with serious games: Is fun playing the game a predictor of learning success? Br. J. Edu. Technol. 47(1), 151–163 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. All, A., Nuñez Patricia Castellar, E., Van Looy, J.: Digital game-based learning effectiveness assessment: reflections on study design. Comput. Educ. 167 (2021). ISSN 0360-1315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104160

  3. Rajendran, D., Santhanam, P.: Towards digital game-based learning con-tent with multi-objective reinforcement learning. Mater. Today: Proc. 2214–7853 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.03.156.

  4. Giessen, H.W.: Serious games effects: an overview. Procedia – Soc. Behav. Sci. 174, 2240–2244 (2015). ISSN 1877-0428, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.881

  5. Mouaheb, H., Fahli, A., Moussetad, M., Eljamali, S.: The serious game: what educational benefits? Procedia – Soc. Behav. Sci. 46, 5502–5508 (2012). ISSN 1877-0428, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.465

  6. Mayer, I.: Towards a comprehensive methodology for the research and evaluation of serious games. Procedia Comput. Sci. 15, 233–247 (2012). ISSN 1877-0509, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2012.10.075

  7. Khenissi, M.A., Essalmi, F., Jemni, M.: comparison between serious games and learning version of existing games. Procedia – Soc. Behav. Sci. 191, 487–494 (2015). ISSN 1877-0428, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.380

  8. Paiva, A.C.R., Flores, N.H., Barbosa, A.G., Ribeiro, T.P.B.: iLearnTest – framework for educational games. Procedia – Soc. Behav. Sci. 228, 443–448 (2016). ISSN 1877-0428, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.068

    Google Scholar 

  9. Carvalho, M.B., et al.: An activity theory-based model for serious games analysis and conceptual design, Comput. Educ. 87, 166–181 (2015). ISSN 0360-1315, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.023

  10. Buchinger, D., da Silva Hounsell, M.: Guidelines for designing and using collaborative-competitive serious games. Comput. Educ. 118, 133–149 (2018). ISSN 0360-1315, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.007

  11. Munekata, N., Kunita, I., Hoshino, J. (eds.): ICEC 2017. LNCS, vol. 10507. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66715-7

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. BEACONING project. D3.3 Learning Environment System Specification (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stefan, I.A., Baalsrud, H.J.M., Sallinen, N., Stefan, A., Gheorghe, A.F.: Accessibility and education: are we fulfilling state of the art requirements?. The 17th International Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Education 2021, eLse, Bucharest (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  14. GLP.

    Google Scholar 

  15. de Macedo, C.M.S., Ribas, U.V.: Accessibility guidelines for the development of learning objects. Procedia Comput. Sci. 14, 155–162 (2012). ISSN 1877-0509, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2012.10.018

  16. Gutiérrez y Restrepo, E., Benavidez, C., Gutiérrez, H.: The challenge of teaching to create accessible learning objects to higher education lecturers. Procedia Comput. Sci. 14, 371–381 (2012). ISSN 1877-0509, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2012.10.043

  17. Ben Salah, N., Bayoudh Saadi, I, Ben Ghezala, H.: A multidimensional framework to study accessible guidance in u-learning systems for disabled learners. Procedia Comput. Sci. 176, 490–499 (2020). ISSN 1877-0509, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.08.051

  18. Ismail, A., Kuppusamy, K.S.: Web accessibility investigation and identification of major issues of higher education websites with statistical measures: a case study of college websites. J. King Saud Univ. – Comput. Inf. Sci. 1319–1578 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2019.03.011

  19. Acosta-Vargas, P., González, M., Luján-Mora, S.: Dataset for evaluating the accessibility of the websites of selected Latin American universities. Data Brief 28 (2020). ISSN 2352-3409, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.105013

  20. Baalsrud Hauge, J., Stefan, I.: Improving learning outcome by re-using and modifying gamified lessons paths. In: Ma, M., Fletcher, B., Göbel, S., Baalsrud Hauge, J., Marsh, T. (eds.) JCSG 2020. LNCS, vol. 12434, pp. 150–163. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61814-8_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Barrass, S., Kramer, G.: Using sonification. Multimed. Syst. 7(1), 23–31 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bell, B.: Investigate and decide learning environments: specializing task models for authoring tool design. J. Learn. Sci. 7(1), 65–105 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0701_3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wiley, D.A.: Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: a definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. Inst. Use Learn. Objects 2830(435), 1–35 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Martinez, M.: Designing learning objects to personalise learning margaret martinez in Wiley, D.A. Inst. Use Learn. Objects 2830(435), 151–172 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work presented herein is partially funded under the Erasmus+ Program of the European Union, INCLUDEME – Inclusive Digital Environments to Enable High-Quality Education for Disadvantaged and Disabled Learners, Grant Agreement 621547-EPP-1–2020-1-RO-EPPA3-IPI-SOC-IN.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jannicke Baalsrud Hauge .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hauge, J.B., Stefan, I.A., Hauge, J.B., Stefan, A., Gheorghe, A.F. (2021). Redesign with Accessibility in Mind: A Visual Impairment Study. In: Fletcher, B., Ma, M., Göbel, S., Baalsrud Hauge, J., Marsh, T. (eds) Serious Games. JCSG 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12945. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88272-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88272-3_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-88271-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-88272-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics