Skip to main content

Distant Finetuning with Discourse Relations for Stance Classification

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Natural Language Processing and Chinese Computing (NLPCC 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 13029))

  • 1698 Accesses

Abstract

Approaches for the stance classification task, an important task for understanding argumentation in debates and detecting fake news, have been relying on models which deal with individual debate topics. In this paper, in order to train a system independent from topics, we propose a new method to extract data with silver labels from raw text to finetune a model for stance classification. The extraction relies on specific discourse relation information, which is shown as a reliable and accurate source for providing stance information. We also propose a 3-stage training framework where the noisy level in the data used for finetuning decreases over different stages going from the most noisy to the least noisy. Detailed experiments show that the automatically annotated dataset as well as the 3-stage training help improve model performance in stance classification. Our approach ranks 1\(^{\text {st}}\) among 26 competing teams in the stance classification track of the NLPCC 2021 shared task Argumentative Text Understanding for AI Debater, which confirms the effectiveness of our approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://github.com/CLUEbenchmark/CLUE.

References

  1. Allaway, E., McKeown, K.: Zero-shot stance detection: a dataset and model using generalized topic representations. In: Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 8913–8931. Association for Computational Linguistics (November 2020)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anand, P., et al.: Cats rule and dogs drool!: classifying stance in online debate. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity and Sentiment Analysis (WASSA 2.011), pp. 1–9. Association for Computational Linguistics, Portland, Oregon (June 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bar-Haim, R., Bhattacharya, I., Dinuzzo, F., Saha, A., Slonim, N.: Stance classification of context-dependent claims. In: Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: vol. 1, Long Paper, pp. 251–261. Association for Computational Linguistics, Valencia, Spain (April 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Conforti, C., Berndt, J., Pilehvar, M.T., Giannitsarou, C., Toxvaerd, F., Collier, N.: Will-They-won’t-they: a very large dataset for stance detection on Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 1715–1724. Association for Computational Linguistics (July 2020)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Conneau, A., et al.: Unsupervised cross-lingual representation learning at scale. In: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 8440–8451. Association for Computational Linguistics (July 2020)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cui, Y., Che, W., Liu, T., Qin, B., Wang, S., Hu, G.: Revisiting Pre-Trained models for Chinese natural language processing. In: Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020, pp. 657–668. Association for Computational Linguistics (November 2020)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dey, K., Shrivastava, R., Kaushik, S.: Topical stance detection for twitter: a two-phase LSTM model using attention. In: Pasi, G., Piwowarski, B., Azzopardi, L., Hanbury, A. (eds.) ECIR 2018. LNCS, vol. 10772, pp. 529–536. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76941-7_40

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Ghosh, S., Singhania, P., Singh, S., Rudra, K., Ghosh, S.: Stance detection in web and social media: a comparative study. In: Crestani, F., et al. (eds.) CLEF 2019. LNCS, vol. 11696, pp. 75–87. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28577-7_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Ghosh, S., Anand, K., Rajanala, S., Reddy, A.B., Singh, M.: Unsupervised stance classification in online debates. In: Proceedings of the ACM India Joint International Conference on Data Science and Management of Data, CoDS-COMAD 2018, pp. 30–36. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (January 2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hasan, K.S., Ng, V.: Extra-Linguistic constraints on stance recognition in ideological debates. In: Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (vol. 2: Short Papers), pp. 816–821. Association for Computational Linguistics, Sofia, Bulgaria (August 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kobbe, J., Hulpuş, I., Stuckenschmidt, H.: Unsupervised stance detection for arguments from consequences. In: Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 50–60. Association for Computational Linguistics (November 2020)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Küçük, D., Can, F.: Stance detection: a survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 53(1), 1–37 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Loshchilov, I., Hutter, F.: Decoupled weight decay regularization (November 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Murakami, A., Raymond, R.: Support or oppose? classifying positions in online debates from reply activities and opinion expressions. In: Coling 2010: Posters, pp. 869–875. Coling 2010 Organizing Committee, Beijing, China (August 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Popat, K., Mukherjee, S., Yates, A., Weikum, G.: STANCY: stance classification based on consistency cues. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pp. 6413–6418. Association for Computational Linguistics, Hong Kong, China (November 2019)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sirrianni, J., Liu, X., Adams, D.: Agreement prediction of arguments in cyber argumentation for detecting stance polarity and intensity. In: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 5746–5758. Association for Computational Linguistics (July 2020)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Slonim, N., et al.: An autonomous debating system. Nature 591(7850), 379–384 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sobhani, P., Mohammad, S., Kiritchenko, S.: Detecting stance in tweets and analyzing its interaction with sentiment. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics, pp. 159–169. Association for Computational Linguistics, Berlin, Germany (August 2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Somasundaran, S., Wiebe, J.: Recognizing stances in online debates. In: Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP, pp. 226–234. Association for Computational Linguistics, Suntec, Singapore (August 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sun, Q., Wang, Z., Zhu, Q., Zhou, G.: Stance detection with hierarchical attention network. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 2399–2409. Association for Computational Linguistics, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA (August 2018)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Thomas, M., Pang, B., Lee, L.: Get out the vote: Determining support or opposition from congressional floor-debate transcripts. In: Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 327–335. Association for Computational Linguistics, Sydney, Australia (July 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Toledo-Ronen, O., Orbach, M., Bilu, Y., Spector, A., Slonim, N.: Multilingual argument mining: Datasets and analysis. In: Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020, pp. 303–317. Association for Computational Linguistics (November 2020)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Xu, L., et al.: CLUE: a Chinese language understanding evaluation benchmark. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 4762–4772. International Committee on Computational Linguistics, Barcelona, Spain (December 2020). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.419, https://aclanthology.org/2020.coling-main.419

  24. Yu, J., Jiang, J., Khoo, L.M.S., Chieu, H.L., Xia, R.: Coupled hierarchical transformer for stance-aware rumor verification in social media conversations. In: Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 1392–1401. Association for Computational Linguistics (November 2020)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lifeng Jin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Jin, L., Xu, K., Song, L., Yu, D. (2021). Distant Finetuning with Discourse Relations for Stance Classification. In: Wang, L., Feng, Y., Hong, Y., He, R. (eds) Natural Language Processing and Chinese Computing. NLPCC 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13029. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88483-3_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88483-3_39

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-88482-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-88483-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics