Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Differential Monitoring

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Runtime Verification (RV 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 12974))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We argue that the time is ripe to investigate differential monitoring, in which the specification of a program’s behavior is implicitly given by a second program implementing the same informal specification. Similar ideas have been proposed before, and are currently implemented in restricted form for testing and specialized run-time analyses, aspects of which we combine. We discuss the challenges of implementing differential monitoring as a general-purpose, black-box run-time monitoring framework, and present promising results of a preliminary implementation, showing low monitoring overheads for diverse programs.

Supported in part by Austrian Science Fund (FWF) grant Z211-N23 (Wittgenstein Award).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Barringer, H., Falcone, Y., Havelund, K., Reger, G., Rydeheard, D.: Quantified event automata: towards expressive and efficient runtime monitors. In: Giannakopoulou, D., Méry, D. (eds.) FM 2012. LNCS, vol. 7436, pp. 68–84. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32759-9_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Bartocci, E., Falcone, Y. (eds.): Lectures on Runtime Verification - Introductory and Advanced Topics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 10457. Springer, Heidelberg (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75632-5

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Bauer, A., Leucker, M., Schallhart, C.: Runtime verification for LTL and TLTL. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 20(4) (2011). https://doi.org/10.1145/2000799.2000800

  4. Berger, E.D., Zorn, B.G.: DieHard: probabilistic memory safety for unsafe languages. In: PLDI 2006, p. 158–168. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2006). https://doi.org/10.1145/1133981.1134000

  5. Bonakdarpour, B., Navabpour, S., Fischmeister, S.: Time-triggered runtime verification. Formal Methods Syst. Design 43(1), 29–60 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10703-012-0182-0

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Cadar, C., Hosek, P.: Multi-version software updates. In: HotSWUp 2012, pp. 36–40 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/HotSWUp.2012.6226615

  7. Chen, F., Roşu, G.: Parametric trace slicing and monitoring. In: Kowalewski, S., Philippou, A. (eds.) TACAS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5505, pp. 246–261. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00768-2_23

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, L., Avizienis, A.: N-version programming: a fault-tolerance approach to reliability of software operation. In: FTCS 1978, vol. 1, pp. 3–9 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, L., Avizienis, A.: N-version programming: a fault-tolerance approach to reliability of software operation. In: FTCS 1995, ‘Highlights from Twenty-Five Years’, p. 113ff (1995). https://doi.org/10.1109/FTCSH.1995.532621

  10. Clarkson, M.R., Finkbeiner, B., Koleini, M., Micinski, K.K., Rabe, M.N., Sánchez, C.: Temporal logics for hyperproperties. In: Abadi, M., Kremer, S. (eds.) POST 2014. LNCS, vol. 8414, pp. 265–284. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54792-8_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Coppens, B., Sutter, B.D., Volckaert, S.: Multi-variant execution environments. In: Larsen, P., Sadeghi, A. (eds.) The Continuing Arms Race: Code-Reuse Attacks and Defenses, pp. 211–258. ACM/Morgan & Claypool (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3129743.3129752

  12. Cox, B., et al.: N-Variant systems: a secretless framework for security through diversity. In: USENIX-SS 2006. USENIX Association, USA (2006). https://www.usenix.org/conference/15th-usenix-security-symposium/n-variant-systems-secretless-framework-security-through

  13. Demri, S., Lazic, R.: LTL with the freeze quantifier and register automata. ACM Trans. Comput. Log. 10(3), 16:1–16:30 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1145/1507244.1507246

  14. Elmendorf, W.: Fault-tolerant programming. In: FTCS 1972, pp. 79–83 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Evans, R.B., Savoia, A.: Differential testing: a new approach to change detection. In: ESEC-FSE companion 2007, pp. 549–552. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2007). https://doi.org/10.1145/1295014.1295038

  16. Falcone, Y., Fernandez, J., Mounier, L.: What can you verify and enforce at runtime? Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf. 14(3), 349–382 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10009-011-0196-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Falcone, Y., Mariani, L., Rollet, A., Saha, S.: Runtime failure prevention and reaction. In: Bartocci, E., Falcone, Y. (eds.) Lectures on Runtime Verification. LNCS, vol. 10457, pp. 103–134. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75632-5_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Fischler, M.A. et al.: Distinct software: an approach to reliable computing. In: 2nd USA-Japan Computer Conference, pp. 1–7 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fokkink, W.J.: Introduction to Process Algebra. Texts in Theoretical Computer Science. An EATCS Series. Springer, Heidelberg (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04293-9

  20. Girard, E., Rault, J.: A programming technique for software reliability. In: IEEE Symposium on Computer Software Reliability, pp. 44–50 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Glabbeek, R.J.: The linear time - branching time spectrum. In: Baeten, J.C.M., Klop, J.W. (eds.) CONCUR 1990. LNCS, vol. 458, pp. 278–297. Springer, Heidelberg (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0039066

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. van Glabbeek, R.J., et al.: The linear time—branching time spectrum II. In: Best, E. (ed.) CONCUR 1993. LNCS, vol. 715, pp. 66–81. Springer, Heidelberg (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57208-2_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Grigore, R., Distefano, D., Petersen, R.L., Tzevelekos, N.: Runtime verification based on register automata. In: Piterman, N., Smolka, S.A. (eds.) TACAS 2013. LNCS, vol. 7795, pp. 260–276. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36742-7_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Groce, A., Holzmann, G., Joshi, R.: Randomized differential testing as a prelude to formal verification. In: ICSE 2007, pp. 621–631. IEEE Computer Society, USA (2007). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2007.68

  25. Havelund, K., Reger, G., Roşu, G.: Runtime verification past experiences and future projections. In: Steffen, B., Woeginger, G. (eds.) Computing and Software Science. LNCS, vol. 10000, pp. 532–562. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91908-9_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Hosek, P., Cadar, C.: VARAN the unbelievable: an efficient N-version execution framework. In: ASPLOS 2015, pp. 339–353. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2694344.2694390

  27. Kallas, K., Niksic, F., Stanford, C., Alur, R.: DiffStream: differential output testing for stream processing programs. PACMPL 4(OOPSLA) (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3428221

  28. Knight, J.C., Leveson, N.G.: An experimental evaluation of the assumption of independence in multiversion programming. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 12(1), 96–109 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.1986.6312924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Knight, J.C., Leveson, N.G.: A reply to the criticisms of the Knight & Leveson experiment. ACM SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 15(1), 24–35 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1145/382294.382710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kopetz, H.: Software redundancy in real time systems. In: IFIP Congress 1974, pp. 182–186. North-Holland (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lehmann, D., Pradel, M.: Feedback-directed differential testing of interactive debuggers. In: ESEC/FSE 2018, pp. 610–620. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3236024.3236037

  32. McKeeman, W.M.: Differential testing for software. Digit. Tech. J. 10(1), 100–107 (1998). http://www.hpl.hp.com/hpjournal/dtj/vol10num1/vol10num1art9.pdf

  33. Muehlboeck, F., Henzinger, T.A.: Differential monitoring. Technical report 9946, IST Austria (2021). https://research-explorer.app.ist.ac.at/librecat/record/9946

  34. Pina, L., Andronidis, A., Hicks, M., Cadar, C.: MVEDSUA: higher availability dynamic software updates via multi-version execution. In: ASPLOS 2019, pp. 573–585. ACM (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3297858.3304063

  35. Pnueli, A., Zaks, A.: PSL model checking and run-time verification via testers. In: Misra, J., Nipkow, T., Sekerinski, E. (eds.) FM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4085, pp. 573–586. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11813040_38

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Pomerance, C., Selfridge, J.L., Wagstaff, S.S.: The pseudoprimes to \(25 \cdot 10^9\). Math. Comput. 35(151), 1003–1026 (1980)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Rigger, M., Su, Z.: Detecting optimization bugs in database engines via non-optimizing reference engine construction. In: ESEC/FSE 2020, pp. 1140–1152. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3368089.3409710

  38. Rigger, M., Su, Z.: Finding bugs in database systems via query partitioning. PACMPL 4(OOPSLA) (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3428279

  39. Sánchez, C.: Online and offline stream runtime verification of synchronous systems. In: Colombo, C., Leucker, M. (eds.) RV 2018. LNCS, vol. 11237, pp. 138–163. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03769-7_9

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Slutz, D.R.: Massive stochastic testing of SQL. In: VLDB 1998, pp. 618–622. Morgan Kaufmann (1998). http://www.vldb.org/conf/1998/p618.pdf

  41. Volckaert, S., De Sutter, B., De Baets, T., De Bosschere, K.: GHUMVEE: efficient, effective, and flexible replication. In: Garcia-Alfaro, J., Cuppens, F., Cuppens-Boulahia, N., Miri, A., Tawbi, N. (eds.) FPS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7743, pp. 261–277. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37119-6_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  42. Yang, X., Chen, Y., Eide, E., Regehr, J.: Finding and understanding bugs in C compilers. In: PLDI 2011, pp. 283–294. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2011). https://doi.org/10.1145/1993498.1993532

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank Borzoo Bonakdarpour, Derek Dreyer, Adrian Francalanza, Owolabi Legunsen, Matthew Milano, Manuel Rigger, Cesar Sanchez, and the members of the IST Verification Seminar for their helpful comments and insights on various stages of this work, as well as the reviewers of RV’21 for their helpful suggestions on the actual paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. IST Austria, 3400, Klosterneuburg, Austria

    Fabian Muehlboeck & Thomas A. Henzinger

Authors
  1. Fabian Muehlboeck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas A. Henzinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabian Muehlboeck .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA

    Lu Feng

  2. Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er Sheva, Israel

    Dana Fisman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Muehlboeck, F., Henzinger, T.A. (2021). Differential Monitoring. In: Feng, L., Fisman, D. (eds) Runtime Verification. RV 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12974. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88494-9_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88494-9_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-88493-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-88494-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation