Skip to main content

Type or Individual? Evidence of Large-Scale Conceptual Disarray in Wikidata

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Conceptual Modeling (ER 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 13011))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The distinction between types and individuals is key to most conceptual modeling techniques. Despite that, there are a number of situations in which modelers navigate this distinction inadequately, leading to problematic models. We show evidence of a large number of modeling mistakes associated with the failure to employ this distinction in the Wikidata knowledge graph, which can be identified with the incorrect use of instantiation, which is a relation between an individual and a type, and specialization (or subtyping), which is a relation between two types.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Wikidata dump generated in 14 September 2020, https://zenodo.org/record/4046102.

  2. 2.

    Further dump details and mirrors at https://wdumps.toolforge.org/dump/749.

  3. 3.

    Available at https://atilioa.github.io/WikidataAntiPatternAnalyzer/.

References

  1. Almeida, J.P.A., Fonseca, C.M., Carvalho, V.A.: A comprehensive formal theory for multi-level conceptual modeling. In: Mayr, H.C., Guizzardi, G., Ma, H., Pastor, O. (eds.) ER 2017. LNCS, vol. 10650, pp. 280–294. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69904-2_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Brasileiro, F., Almeida, J.P.A., Carvalho, V.A., Guizzardi, G.: Applying a multi-level modeling theory to assess taxonomic hierarchies in Wikidata. In: Proceedings of 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web, pp. 975–980. WWW 2016 Companion (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carvalho, V.A., Almeida, J.P.A.: Toward a well-founded theory for multi-level conceptual modeling. Softw. Syst. Model. 17(1), 205–231 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-016-0538-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fonseca, C.M., Almeida, J.P.A., Guizzardi, G., Carvalho, V.A.: Multi-level conceptual modeling: theory, language and application. Data Knowl. Eng. 134, 101894 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2021.101894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Foxvog, D.: Instances of instances modeled via higher-order classes. In: Workshop on Foundational Aspects of Ontologies, 28th German Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 46–54 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Masolo, C., Oltramari, A.: Sweetening WORDNET with DOLCE. AI Mag. 24(3), 13 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v24i3.1715

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Oltramari, A.: Conceptual analysis of lexical taxonomies: the case of WordNet top-level. In: Proceedings of FOIS 2001, pp. 285–296 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1145/505168.505195

  8. Guizzardi, G., Almeida, J.P.A., Guarino, N., Carvalho, V.A.: Towards an ontological analysis of powertypes. In: Proc. Joint Ontology Workshops 2015 Episode 1: The Argentine Winter of Ontology. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1517. CEUR-WS.org (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Paulheim, H., Gangemi, A.: Serving DBpedia with DOLCE – more than just adding a cherry on top. In: Arenas, M., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2015. LNCS, vol. 9366, pp. 180–196. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25007-6_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Ravin, Y., Leacock, C.: Polysemy: Theoretical and Computational Approaches. OUP (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wetzel, L.: Types and Tokens: On Abstract Objects. MIT Press, Cambridge (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Wikidata: Help:items – Wikidata (2021). https://web.archive.org/web/20210127110938/. https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Help:Items. Accessed 2 May 2021

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is partly funded by Brazilian funding agencies CNPq (grants 313687/2020-0, 407235/2017-5) and CAPES (grant 23038.028816/2016-41). Claudenir M. Fonseca and Giancarlo Guizzardi are supported by the NeXON Project (Free University of Bozen-Bolzano).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to João Paulo A. Almeida .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dadalto, A.A., Almeida, J.P.A., Fonseca, C.M., Guizzardi, G. (2021). Type or Individual? Evidence of Large-Scale Conceptual Disarray in Wikidata. In: Ghose, A., Horkoff, J., Silva Souza, V.E., Parsons, J., Evermann, J. (eds) Conceptual Modeling. ER 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13011. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89022-3_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89022-3_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-89021-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-89022-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics