Skip to main content

Demonstrating the Differential Impact of Flock Heterogeneity on Multi-agent Herding

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems (TAROS 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 13054))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper explores the differential impact of multi-agent system heterogeneity in the context of an idealised herding task. In simulation, a team of simple herders must move a flock towards a target location in a continuous 2d space. Flock heterogeneity is controlled by dividing the flock into a number of non-overlapping social groups that influence sheep movement. Results demonstrate that increasing system heterogeneity (i.e., the number of different social groups) reduces herding performance when social groups are self-attracting, but conversely, the same increase in system heterogeneity can increase herding performance when groups are other-attracting. Implications for designing heterogeneous multi-agent systems are considered.

This work was funded and delivered in partnership between the Thales Group and the University of Bristol, and with the support of the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Grant Award EP/R004757/1 entitled ‘Thales-Bristol Partnership in Hybrid Autonomous Systems Engineering (T-B PHASE)’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahn, H.S., Lee, M.H., Macdonald, B.A.: Healthcare robot systems for a hospital environment: CareBot and ReceptionBot. In: Proceedings - IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, vol. 2015-Novem, pp. 571–576. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., November 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2015.7333621

  2. Arthur, W.: Inductive reasoning and bounded rationality. Am. Econ. Rev. 84(2), 406–411 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aurenhammer, F.: Voronoi diagrams–a survey of a fundamental geometric data structure. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 23(3), 345–405 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Balch, T.: Hierarchic social entropy: an information theoretic measure of robot group diversity. Auton. Robot. 8(3), 209–237 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Baray, C.: Evolving cooperation via communication in homogeneous multi-agent systems. In: Proceedings - Intelligent Information Systems, IIS 1997, pp. 204–208. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. (1997). https://doi.org/10.1109/IIS.1997.645219

  6. Bongard, J.C.: The legion system: a novel approach to evolving heterogeneity for collective problem solving. In: Poli, R., Banzhaf, W., Langdon, W.B., Miller, J., Nordin, P., Fogarty, T.C. (eds.) EuroGP 2000. LNCS, vol. 1802, pp. 16–28. Springer, Heidelberg (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-46239-2_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Elsayed, S., et al.: Path planning for shepherding a swarm in a cluttered environment using differential evolution. In: 2020 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence, SSCI 2020, pp. 2194–2201, December 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/SSCI47803.2020.9308572

  8. Emam, Y., Mayya, S., Notomista, G., Bohannon, A., Egerstedt, M.: Adaptive task allocation for heterogeneous multi-robot teams with evolving and unknown robot capabilities. In: Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 7719–7725. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., May 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA40945.2020.9197283

  9. Grocholsky, B., Keller, J., Kumar, V., Pappas, G.: Cooperative air and ground surveillance. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 13(3), 16–26 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hu, J., Turgut, A.E., Krajnik, T., Lennox, B., Arvin, F.: Occlusion-based coordination protocol design for autonomous robotic shepherding tasks. IEEE Trans. Cogn. Dev. Syst. (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson, A., Hautaluoma, G., Agle, D.: NASA’s ingenuity mars helicopter succeeds in historic first flight. https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-s-ingenuity-mars-helicopter-succeeds-in-historic-first-flight. Accessed 10 May 2021

  12. Ashby, W.R.: Requisite variety and its implications for the control of complex systems. In: Klir, G.J. (ed.) Facets of Systems Science, vol. 7, pp. 405–417. Springer, Boston (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0718-9_28

  13. Lien, J.M., Bayazit, O.B., Sowell, R.T., Rodríguez, S., Amato, N.M.: Shepherding behaviors. In: Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 2004, pp. 4159–4164 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1109/robot.2004.1308924

  14. Madden, J.D., Arkin, R.C.: Modeling the effects of mass and age variation in wolves to explore the effects of heterogeneity in robot team composition. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, ROBIO 2011, pp. 663–670 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBIO.2011.6181362

  15. Özdemir, A., Gauci, M., Gross, R.: Shepherding with robots that do not compute, pp. 332–339. MIT Press - Journals (2017). https://doi.org/10.1162/isal_a_056

  16. Page, S.: The Difference. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Parker, L.E.: Lifelong adaptation in heterogeneous multi-robot teams: response to continual variation in individual robot performance. Auton. Robot. 8(3), 239–267 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pierson, A., Schwager, M.: Bio-inspired non-cooperative multi-robot herding. In: Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 2015-June, pp. 1843–1849. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., June 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2015.7139438

  19. Strömbom, D., et al.: Solving the shepherding problem: heuristics for herding autonomous, interacting agents. J. R. Soc. Interface 11(100), 20140719 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Surowiecki, J.: The wisdom of crowds (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Twu, P., Mostofi, Y., Egerstedt, M.: A measure of heterogeneity in multi-agent systems. In: Proceedings of the American Control Conference, pp. 3972–3977. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACC.2014.6858632

  22. Vaughan, R., Sumpter, N., Henderson, J., Frost, A., Cameron, S.: Experiments in automatic flock control. Robot. Auton. Syst. 31(1), 109–117 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Waibel, M., Keller, L., Floreano, D.: Genetic team composition and level of selection in the evolution of cooperation. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 13(3), 648–660 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris Bennett .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bennett, C., Bullock, S., Lawry, J. (2021). Demonstrating the Differential Impact of Flock Heterogeneity on Multi-agent Herding. In: Fox, C., Gao, J., Ghalamzan Esfahani, A., Saaj, M., Hanheide, M., Parsons, S. (eds) Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems. TAROS 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13054. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89177-0_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89177-0_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-89176-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-89177-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics