Skip to main content

An Improved Deep Model for Knowledge Tracing and Question-Difficulty Discovery

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
PRICAI 2021: Trends in Artificial Intelligence (PRICAI 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 13032))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Knowledge Tracing (KT) aims to analyze a student’s acquisition of skills over time by examining the student’s performance on questions of those skills. In recent years, a recurrent neural network model called deep knowledge tracing (DKT) has been proposed to handle the knowledge tracing task and literature has shown that DKT generally outperforms traditional methods. However, DKT and its variants often lead to oscillation results on a skill’s state may due to it ignoring the skill’s difficulty or the question’s difficulty. As a result, even when a student performs well on a skill, the prediction of that skill’s mastery level decreases instead, and vice versa. This is undesirable and unreasonable because student’s performance is expected to transit gradually over time. In this paper, we propose to learn the knowledge tracing model in a “simple-to-difficult” process, leading to a method of Self-paced Deep Knowledge Tracing (SPDKT). SPDKT learns the difficulty of per question from the student’s responses to optimize the question’s order and smooth the learning process. With mitigating the cause of oscillations, SPDKT has the capability of robustness to the puzzling questions. The experiments on real-world datasets show SPDKT achieves state-of-the-art performance on question response prediction and reaches interesting interpretations in education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://sites.google.com/site/assistmentsdata/home/assistment-2009-2010-data/skill-builder-data-2009-2010.

  2. 2.

    https://sites.google.com/site/assistmentsdata/home/2015-assistments-skill-builder-data.

  3. 3.

    https://pslcdatashop.web.cmu.edu/DatasetInfo?datasetId=507.

  4. 4.

    http://www.bnu-ai.cn/data.

References

  1. Mitrovic, A.: Fifteen years of constraint-based tutors: what we have achieved and where we are going. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 22(1–2), 39–72 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yudelson, M.V., Koedinger, K.R., Gordon, G.J.: Individualized bayesian knowledge tracing models. In: Lane, H.C., Yacef, K., Mostow, J., Pavlik, P. (eds.) AIED 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7926, pp. 171–180. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang, Y., et al.: Graphs regularized robust matrix factorization and its application on student grade prediction. Appl. Sci. 10(5), 1755 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Corbett, A.T., Anderson, J.R.: Knowledge tracing: modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 4(4), 253–278 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gaebel, M.: MOOCs: Massive Open Online Courses. EUA, Geneva (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Piech, C., et al.: Deep knowledge tracing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.05908 (2015)

  7. Scruggs, R., Baker, R.S., McLaren, B.M.: Extending deep knowledge tracing: inferring interpretable knowledge and predicting post-system performance. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.12597 (2019)

  8. Zhang, L., et al.: Incorporating rich features into deep knowledge tracing. In: Proceedings of the Fourth (2017) ACM Conference on Learning@scale (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yeung, C.-K., Yeung, D.-Y.: Addressing two problems in deep knowledge tracing via prediction-consistent regularization. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Annual ACM Conference on Learning at Scale (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wang, Z., Feng, X., Tang, J., Huang, G.Y., Liu, Z.: Deep knowledge tracing with side information. In: Isotani, S., Millán, E., Ogan, A., Hastings, P., McLaren, B., Luckin, R. (eds.) AIED 2019. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11626, pp. 303–308. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23207-8_56

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Benedetto, L., et al.: R2DE: a NLP approach to estimating IRT parameters of newly generated questions. In: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang, J., et al.: Dynamic key-value memory networks for knowledge tracing. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Baker, F.B.: The basics of item response theory. For full text (2001). http://ericae.net/irt/baker

  14. Zhang, Y., et al.: Meta-knowledge dictionary learning on 1-bit response data for student knowledge diagnosis. Knowl. Based Syst. 205, 106290 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Khajah, M., Lindsey, R.V., Mozer, M.C.: How deep is knowledge tracing?. arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.02416 (2016)

  16. Liu, Q., et al.: EKT: exercise-aware knowledge tracing for student performance prediction. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 33(1), 100–115 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bengio, Y., et al.: Curriculum learning. In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kumar, M.P., Packer, B., Koller, D.: Self-paced learning for latent variable models. In: NIPS, vol. 1 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tang, K., et al.: Shifting weights: adapting object detectors from image to video. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lin, L., et al.: Active self-paced learning for cost-effective and progressive face identification. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 40(1), 7–19 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kumar, M.P., et al.: Learning specific-class segmentation from diverse data. In: 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pi, T., et al.: Self-paced boost learning for classification. In: IJCAI (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Li, H., Gong, M.: Self-paced convolutional neural networks. In: IJCAI (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hunter, D.R., Lange, K.: A tutorial on MM algorithms. Am. Stat. 58(1), 30–37 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Feng, M., Heffernan, N., Koedinger, K.: Addressing the assessment challenge with an online system that tutors as it assesses. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 19(3), 243–266 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Xiong, X., et al.: Going deeper with deep knowledge tracing. International Educational Data Mining Society (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Khajah, M., et al.: Integrating latent-factor and knowledge-tracing models to predict individual differences in learning. In: Educational Data Mining 2014 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Koedinger, K.R., et al.: A data repository for the EDM community: the PSLC DataShop. In: Handbook of Educational Data Mining, vol. 43, pp. 43–56 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jiang, L., et al.: Self-paced curriculum learning. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. vol. 29, no. 1 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ai, F., et al.: Concept-aware deep knowledge tracing and exercise recommendation in an online learning system. International Educational Data Mining Society (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sonkar, S., et al.: qDKT: question-centric deep knowledge tracing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.12442 (2020)

Download references

Acknowledgments

All authors thank the editors and the reviewers for their helpful comments. This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61802313, U1811262), the Reformation Research on Education and Teaching at Northwestern Polytechnical University (Grant No. 2021JGY31).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yupei Zhang or Xuequn Shang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dai, H., Zhang, Y., Yun, Y., Shang, X. (2021). An Improved Deep Model for Knowledge Tracing and Question-Difficulty Discovery. In: Pham, D.N., Theeramunkong, T., Governatori, G., Liu, F. (eds) PRICAI 2021: Trends in Artificial Intelligence. PRICAI 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13032. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89363-7_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89363-7_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-89362-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-89363-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics