Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Web of Data’s Role in Legal Ecosystems to Address Violent Extremism Fuelled by Hate Speech in Social Media

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems XI-XII (AICOL 2020, AICOL 2018, XAILA 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 13048))

Abstract

It is usually said that technical solutions should operate ethically, in compliance with the law and subject to good governance principles. In this position paper we face the problem of behavioural compliance and law enforcement in the case of hate speech and extremism online. Law enforcement and behavioural compliance are ways of coping with the objective of stopping the spread of hate and radicalisation online. We contend that a combination of regulatory instruments, incentives, training, proactive self-awareness and education can be effective to create legal ecosystems to improve the present situation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination entered into force on January 4th 1969 [15]. It has been ratified by 88 states. The Convention also requires its parties to outlaw hate speech and criminalize membership in racist organizations. USA ratified the Convention, but upon ratification, it stated the following reservations: “1. That the Constitution and laws of the United States contain extensive protections of individual freedom of speech, expression and association. Accordingly, the United States does not accept any obligation under this Convention, in particular under articles 4 and 7, to restrict those rights, through the adoption of legislation or any other measures, to the extent that they are protected by the Constitution and laws of the United States. 2. That the Constitution and laws of the United States establish extensive protections against discrimination, reaching significant areas of non-governmental activity. Individual privacy and freedom from governmental interference in private conduct, however, are also recognized as among the fundamental values which shape our free and democratic society. […] 3. That with reference to article 22 of the Convention, before any dispute to which the United States is a party may be submitted to the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice under this article, the specific consent of the United States is required in each case.” Cfr. https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-2&chapter=4&lang=en#EndDec.

References

  1. Eisen, A.: The Spiritual Audacity of Abraham Joshua Heschel. On Being (2012). https://onbeing.org/programs/arnold-eisen-the-spiritual-audacity-of-abraham-joshua-heschel/

  2. Klemperer, V.: LTI Lingua Tertii Imperii. A Philologist’s Notebook [1975]. Continuum, London (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Andrews, R.v., Smith: 65 O.R. (2d) 161 (Ont.CA) at 179; R v. Keegstra [1990] 3 SCR 697, 699 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Naffi, N.: The Trump effect in Canada: A 600 per cent increase in online hate speech, November 2, 9.37am AEDT The Conversation (2017). https://theconversation.com/the-trump-effect-in-canada-a-600-per-cent-increase-in-online-hate-speech-86026

  5. Oboler, A.: New Zealand Terrorist Attack: Analysis from OHPI. Online Hate Prevention Institute, Melbourne (2019). https://ohpi.org.au/new-zealand-terrorist-attack/

  6. Oboler, A., Allington, W., Scolyer-Gray, P.: Hate and Violent Extremism from an Online Sub-Culture: The Yom Kippur Terrorist Attack in Halle, pp. 15, 16, 22, 33, 34, 40. Online Hate Prevention Institute, Germany, Melbourne (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Naffi, N.: Ceci n’est pas un discours haineux, 23/04/2017 08:21 EDT | Actualisé 23/04/2017 08:21 EDT. https://quebec.huffingtonpost.ca/nadia-naffi/islamophobie-discours-haineux_b_16151548.html

  8. Shields, D.: War Is Beautiful. The New York Times Pictorial Guide to the Glamour of Armed Conflict. Powerhouse Books, Nova York (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Siegel, M.L.: Hate speech, civil rights, and the Internet: the jurisdictional and human rights nightmare. Alb. LJ Sci. Tech. 9, 375–398 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Elphick, L.: Victoria’s new anti-vilification bill strikes the right balance in targeting online abuse. The Conversation, 11 September 2019. https://theconversation.com/victorias-new-anti-vilification-bill-strikes-the-right-balance-in-targeting-online-abuse-123014

  11. Oswald, R.: A month after Capitol riot, a look at domestic terrorism laws, 4 February. https://www.rollcall.com/2021/02/04/a-month-after-capitol-riot-a-look-at-domestic-terrorism-laws/

  12. Terms of Reference - Inquiry into Anti-Vilification Protections, Victorian Parliament, 12 September 2019. https://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/images/stories/committees/lsic-LA/Inquiry_into_Anti-Vilification_Protections_/Terms_of_Reference_-_Inquiry_into_Anti-Vilification_Protections.pdf

  13. Poblet, M., Casanovas, P., Rodríguez-Doncel, V.: Linked Democracy. Springer Briefs. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13363-4

  14. Casanovas, P., Mendelson, D., Poblet, M.: A linked democracy approach for regulating public health data. Heal. Technol. 7(4), 519–537 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-017-0191-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. United Nations: International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial DiscriminationAdopted and opened for signature and ratification by General Assembly resolution 2106 (XX) of 21 December 1965. https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/cerd.aspx

  16. Matal v. Tam: 137 S.Ct. 1744 (2017). 1750, 1764, 1769

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wermiel, S.J.: The ongoing challenge to define free speech. Hum. Rights Mag. 43(4) (2018). https://www.americanbar.org/groups/crsj/publications/human_rights_magazine_home/the-ongoing-challenge-to-define-free-speech/the-ongoing-challenge-to-define-free-speech/

  18. Dworkin, R.: Freedom’s Law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Levin, A.: Pornography, hate speech, and their challenge to Dworkin’s Egalitarian liberalism. Public Aff. Q. 23(4), 357–373 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Waldron, J.: The Harm in Hate Speech. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Oboler, A., Allington, W., Scolyer-Gray, P.: Hate and Violent Extremism from an Online Sub-Culture: The Yom Kippur Terrorist Attack in Halle, Germany, Melbourne, pp. 1–2. Online Hate Prevention Institute (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  22. EU 96/443/JHA: Joint Action of 15 July 1996 adopted by the Council on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, concerning action to combat racism and xenophobia

    Google Scholar 

  23. EU Council Framework Decision 2008/913/JHA of 28 November 2008 on combating certain forms and expressions of racism and xenophobia by means of criminal law

    Google Scholar 

  24. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of Council Framework Decision 2008/913/JHA on combating certain forms and expressions of racism and xenophobia by means of criminal law, COM(2014)27 final, 3–7

    Google Scholar 

  25. Council conclusions on combating hate crime in the European Union – Justice and Home Affairs Council meeting, Brüssel, 5–6 December (2013). http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/jha/139949.pdf

  26. Council of Europe: Additional Protocol to the Convention on Cybercrime, concerning the criminalisation of acts of a racist and xenophobic nature committed through computer systems CETS No 189, 20 October 2013

    Google Scholar 

  27. European Commission: European Commission and IT Companies announce Code of Conduct on illegal online hate speech, ec.europa.eu, 31 May 2016. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-16-1937_en.htm

  28. European Commission: COM(2017) 555 final, 28.9.2017, Communication From The Commission To The European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic And Social Committee And The Committee Of The Regions - Tackling Illegal Content Online

    Google Scholar 

  29. European Commission Recommendation 2018/334 of 1.3.2018 on measures to effectively tackle illegal content online (C(2018) 1177)

    Google Scholar 

  30. European police in coordinated raids against online hate speech. Reuters, 3 November 2020. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-europe-crime-internet-idUSKBN27J1C3

  31. Banks, J.: Regulating hate speech online. Int. Rev. Law Comput. Technol. 24(3), 233–239 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2010.522323

  32. Ingber, S.: Facebook Bans White Nationalism and Separatism Content From Its Platforms, NPR, 27 March 2019. https://www.npr.org/2019/03/27/707258353/facebook-bans-white-nationalism-and-separatism-content-from-its-platforms

  33. Ohlheiser, A., Shapira, I.: Gab, the white supremacist sanctuary linked to the Pittsburgh suspect, goes offline (for now), Washington Post, 29 October 2018. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2018/10/28/how-gab-became-white-supremacist-sanctuary-before-it-was-linked-pittsburgh-suspect/

  34. Dick, S.: Pro-trump supporters switch to gab after twitter bans, parler removal. New Dly. (2021). https://thenewdaily.com.au/news/world/us-news/2021/01/13/trump-social-media-gab/

  35. Collins, B., Zadrozny, B.: Facebook bans QAnon across its platforms. NBC News (2020). https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/facebook-bans-qanon-across-its-platforms-n1242339

  36. Sharples, S.: Donald Trump’s Twitter suspension sees conservative social media site Gab claim thousands of new users, News.com.au, 11 January 2021. https://www.news.com.au/finance/business/technology/donald-trumps-twitter-suspension-sees-conservative-social-media-site-gab-claim-thousands-of-new-users/news-story/8753861b38c1981fb89a5916c5432bd9

  37. Cave, D.: Australia passes law to punish social media companies for violent posts. N. Y. Times (2019). https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/03/world/australia/social-media-law.html

  38. Flynn, K.: Facebook bans news in Australia as fight with government escalates. CNN, 18 February 2021. https://edition.cnn.com/2021/02/17/media/facebook-australia-news-ban/index.html

  39. Gitari, N.D., Zuping, Z., Damien, H., Long, J.: A lexicon-based approach for hate speech detection. Int. J. Multimedia Ubiquitous Eng. 10(4), 215–230 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Djuric, N., Zhou, J., Morris, R., Grbovic, M., Radosavljevic, V., Bhamidipati, N.: Hate speech detection with comment embeddings. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 29–30. ACM, May 2015

    Google Scholar 

  41. Gambäck, B., Sikdar, U.K.: Using convolutional neural networks to classify hate-speech. In: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Abusive Language Online, pp. 85–90 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Waseem, Z., Hovy, D.: Hateful symbols or hateful people? Predictive features for hate speech detection on twitter. In: Proceedings of NAACL-HLT 2016, San Diego, California, 12–17 June, pp. 88–93. Association for Computational Linguistics (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Burnap, P., Williams, M.L.: Cyber hate speech on twitter: an application of machine classification and statistical modeling for policy and decision making. Policy Internet 7(2), 223–242 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Waseem, Z.: Are you a racist or am I seeing things? Annotator influence on hate speech detection on Twitter. In: Proceedings of the First Workshop on NLP and Computational Social Science, pp. 138–142 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Silva, L.A., Mondal, M., Correa, D., Benevenuto, F., Weber, I.: Analyzing the targets of hate in online social media. In: ICWSM, pp. 687–690 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Facebook: Community Standards Enforcement Report. https://transparency.facebook.com/community-standards-enforcement#hate-speech

  47. Oboler, A.: Extremism Online: The Automation of White Supremacy. Online Hate Prevention Institute (2020). https://ohpi.org.au/extremism-online-the-automation-of-white-supremacy/

  48. Oboler, A.: Advertising supports hosting of terrorist manifesto. Online Hate Prevention Institute (2020). https://ohpi.org.au/advertising-supports-hosting-of-terrorist-manifesto/

  49. Erjavec, K., Kovačič, M.P.: You don’t understand, this is a new war! Analysis of hate speech in news web sites’ comments. Mass Commun. Soc. 15(6), pp. 899–920 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Oboler: Online Antisemitism 2.0. “Social Antisemitism” on the “Social Web”, JCPA, 1 April. (Prereleased in February 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Oboler, A.: Aboriginal Memes and Online Hate, p. 19. Online Hate Prevention Institute (2012). https://ohpi.org.au/aboriginal-memes-and-online-hate/

  52. Schmidt, A., Wiegand, M.: A survey on hate speech detection using natural language processing. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Social Media, Valencia, Spain, 3–7 April 2017, pp. 1–10. Association for Computational Linguistics (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Oboler, A., Connelly, K.: Hate speech: a quality of service challenge. In: IEEE Conference on e-Learning, e-Management and e-Services (IC3e), pp. 117–121 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Oboler, A., Connelly, K.: Building SMARTER communities of resistance and solidarity. Cosmopol. Civ. Soc. Interdiscip. J. 10(2), 91–110 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5130/ccs.v10i2.6035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Bourdieu, P.: Distinction: A social Critique of the Judgement of Taste [1979]. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Gunderson, L., Cosens, B.: Case studies in adaptation and transformation of ecosystems, legal systems, and governance systems. In: Cosens, B., Gunderson, L. (eds.) Practical Panarchy for Adaptive Water Governance, pp. 19–31. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72472-0_2

  57. Casanovas, P., Oboler, A.: Behavioural compliance and law enforcement in online hate speech. In: TERECOM@Jurix 2018, pp. 135–134 (2018). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2309/11.pd

  58. Ifinedo, P.: Information systems security policy compliance: an empirical study of the effects of socialisation, influence, and cognition. Inf. Manage. 51(1), 69–79 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Vroom, C., Von Solms, R.: Towards information security behavioural compliance. Comput. Secur. 23(3), 191–198 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Ogbonna, E., Harris, L.C.: Managing organizational culture: compliance or genuine change? Br. J. Manage. 9(4), 273–288 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Oboler, A.: Technology and regulation must work in concert to combat hate speech on line, March 12 2018 6.09pm AEDT (2018). https://theconversation.com/technology-and-regulation-must-work-in-concert-to-combat-hate-speech-online-93072

  62. Casanovas, P.: Semantic web regulatory models: why ethics matter. Philos. Technol. 28(1), 33–55 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  63. Pagallo, U., et al.: AI4People-On Good AI Governance: 14 Priority Actions, a SMART Model of Governance, and a Regulatory Toolbox (2019). https://www.eismd.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/AI4Peoples-Report-on-Good-AI-Governance_compressed1.pdf

  64. Casanovas, P., Poblet, M.: Concepts and fields of relational justice. In: Casanovas, P., Sartor, G., Casellas, N., Rubino, R. (eds.) Computable Models of the Law. LNCS, vol. 4884, pp. 323–339. Springer, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85569-9_21

  65. Online Safety Bill 2020 – Exposure Draft. https://www.communications.gov.au/have-your-say/consultation-bill-new-online-safety-act

  66. Oboler, A., Welsh, K., Cruz, L.: The danger of big data: social media as computational social science. First Monday 17(7) (2012). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v17i7.3993

  67. Gould, J.B.: Speak No Evil: The Triumph of Hate Speech Regulation. University of Chicago Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  68. Delgado, R., Stefancic, J.: Four observations about hate speech. Wake Forest L. Rev. 44, 353–370 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  69. Ross, B., Rist, M., Carbonell, G., Cabrera, B., Kurowsky, N., Wojatzki, M.: Measuring the reliability of hate speech annotations: the case of the European refugee crisis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.08118. (2017)

  70. Kumar, R., Ojha, A.K., Malmasi, S., Zampieri, M.: Benchmarking aggression identification in social media. In: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Trolling, Aggression and Cyberbullying (TRAC-2018), Santa Fe, USA, 25 August, pp. 1–11 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  71. Oboler, A.: Technology and regulation must work in concert to combat hate speech online, March 12, 2018 6.09pm AEDT. https://theconversation.com/technology-and-regulation-must-work-in-concert-to-combat-hate-speech-online-93072

  72. Oboler, A.: Building peace by fighting online hate. Yitzhak Rabin Memorial Lecture, 4 November 2018, Slides (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  73. About GIFCT: Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism. https://gifct.org/about/

  74. Crichton, D.: The deplatforming of president trump. Tech Crunch (2021). https://techcrunch.com/2021/01/09/the-deplatforming-of-a-president/

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partially funded by the Data to Decisions Cooperative Research Centre (D2D CRC, Australia) (http://www.d2dcrc.com.au/), and Meta-Rule of Law (DER2016-78108-P, Spain). Views expressed herein are however not necessarily representative of the views held by the funders. A former and shorter version of this work was presented at TERECOM@Jurix 2018, pp. 135–134 http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2309/11.pd.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. LawTech Research Group, Law School, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia

    Andre Oboler & Pompeu Casanovas

  2. Online Hate Prevention Institute (OHPI), Sydney, Australia

    Andre Oboler

  3. Autonomous University of Barcelona (IDT), Barcelona, Spain

    Pompeu Casanovas

Authors
  1. Andre Oboler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pompeu Casanovas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andre Oboler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Technical University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain

    Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel

  2. University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

    Monica Palmirani

  3. Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland

    Michał Araszkiewicz

  4. La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    Pompeu Casanovas

  5. University of Turin, Turin, Italy

    Ugo Pagallo

  6. University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

    Giovanni Sartor

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Oboler, A., Casanovas, P. (2021). The Web of Data’s Role in Legal Ecosystems to Address Violent Extremism Fuelled by Hate Speech in Social Media. In: Rodríguez-Doncel, V., Palmirani, M., Araszkiewicz, M., Casanovas, P., Pagallo, U., Sartor, G. (eds) AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems XI-XII. AICOL AICOL XAILA 2020 2018 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13048. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89811-3_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89811-3_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-89810-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-89811-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation