Skip to main content

Evaluation of a NUI Interface for an Explosives Deactivator Robotic Arm to Improve the User Experience

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI International 2021 - Late Breaking Posters (HCII 2021)

Abstract

TEDAX agents performe explosives handling tasks that require good assistance in handling EOD robotic arms. The interface used for handling explosive devices is relevant for explosive deactivating agents due to the fact that it can ensure greater immersion and performance in their operations. Generally, robotic arms are manipulated by joysticks, keyboard or buttons that are not very intuitive. NUI interfaces are intuitive and provide assistance in robotic arm manipulation. In this study, it is proposed to verify the feasibility of a NUI interface to manipulate EOD robotic arms. The degree of assistance provided by the interfaces through the NASA-TLX method in TEDAX agents of the UDEX-AQP (Unidad de Desactivación de Explosivos de Arequipa) is compared. The compared interfaces are: a MK-2 commercial robot from Allen Vanguard and a NUI interface based on specular Imitation. The tests show that the NUI interface evaluated can be applied in explosives disposal interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guevara Mamani, J., Pinto, P.P., Vilcapaza Goyzueta, D., Supo Colquehuanca, E., Sulla Espinoza, E., Silva Vidal, Y.: Compilation and analysis of requirements for the design of an explosive ordnance disposal robot prototype applied in UDEX-arequipa. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S. (eds.) HCII 2021. CCIS, vol. 1420, pp. 131–138. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78642-7_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Cio, Y.-S.L.-K., Raison, M., Leblond Ménard, C., Achiche, S.: Proof of concept of an assistive robotic arm control using artificial stereovision and eye-tracking. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 27(12), 2344–2352 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2950619

  3. Gîrbacia, F., Postelnicu, C., Voinea, G.-D.: Towards using natural user interfaces for robotic arm manipulation. In: Berns, K., Görges, D. (eds.) RAAD 2019. AISC, vol. 980, pp. 188–193. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19648-6_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E.: Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Advances in Psychology, vol. 52, pp. 139–183. North-Holland (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Singh, A., Seo, S.H., Hashish, Y., Nakane, M., Young, J.E., Bunt, A.: An interface for remote robotic manipulator control that reduces task load and fatigue. In: 2013 IEEE RO-MAN, pp. 738–743 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2013.6628401

  6. Mizera, C., Delrieu, T., Weistroffer, V., Andriot, C., Decatoire, A., Gazeau, J.: Evaluation of Hand-tracking systems in teleoperation and virtual dexterous manipulation. IEEE Sens. J. 20(3), 1642–1655 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2019.2947612

  7. Artal-Sevil, J.S., Montañés, J.L.: Development of a robotic arm and implementation of a control strategy for gesture recognition through Leap Motion device. In: 2016 Technologies Applied to Electronics Teaching (TAEE), pp. 1–9 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/TAEE.2016.7528373

  8. Marin, G., Dominio, F., Zanuttigh, P.: Hand gesture recognition with leap motion and kinect devices. In: IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) 2014, pp. 1565–1569 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2014.7025313

  9. Mendes, V., et al.: Experience implication in subjective surgical ergonomics comparison between laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgeries. J. Robot. Surg. 14(1), 115–121 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-019-00933-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Denilson Vilcapaza Goyzueta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Vilcapaza Goyzueta, D., Guevara Mamani, J., Sulla Espinoza, E., Supo Colquehuanca, E., Silva Vidal, Y., Pinto, P.P. (2021). Evaluation of a NUI Interface for an Explosives Deactivator Robotic Arm to Improve the User Experience. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S. (eds) HCI International 2021 - Late Breaking Posters. HCII 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1498. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90176-9_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90176-9_37

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-90175-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-90176-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics